 |
|  |
 |
|
SomeOneElse
|
 |
Somewhere, Someplace
Jun 2002 time: 00:20
|
|
Instead of carthage, we should have Phoenicians, as Carthage was just a colony of Phoenicia that became famous because of Rome. Many of the city names used in Civ2 for Carthage were more accurately Phoenician names anyway
Ottomans should be Turks, to have it make sense longer. There were Turks before the Ottoman Empire and there are still Turks, the Ottoman Empire was just a period of history for Turkey.
Byzantium also was just another period of history for Greece-Rome. It was the Eastern Roman Empire that survived after the sac of Rome and became named the Byzantine Empire.
It would be hard to seperate Macedonia from Greece on a Civ3 scale. Alexander the Great, the leader of Greece in Civ3, was a Macedonian
Some other possible civs are the Thai, the Navajo, and the Portuguese
And if we count America as a legitimate civilization, as I think it counts as, we could also add the Canadians and the Austrailians
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Coracle
|
|
I actually like the Byzantines and Carthage. The culture and military of the former became rather different from Rome, and not including Carthage is like not including America because it was once part of Britain.
For those who want to be PC and include an African civ, maybe Ethiopia? Under the great King Menelek they destroyed a huge Italian army in the 1890's.
BTW, the Spanish civ should NOT have "conquistadores" as a UU. They were just a small bunch of thugs who specialized in murdering Native peoples for gold. The UU should be the Tercio, a combinaton of musketmen and pikemen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The_Aussie_Lurker
|
|
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
May 2001 time: 05:20
|
|
Actually, Cathage was NEVER a part of Rome. It was a single city of the Phoenecian Empire, an empire which spanned much of North Africa and the Western Sinai Peninsula! In the bible, the Phoenecians were known as the Canaanites, who are the ancestors of the modern Palestinians!! So basically, the Phonecians lost part of their empire to the Hebrews and later, lost several Mediteranean cities during the Punic Wars! For the life of me, though, I'll never understand the ferocity with which the Romans dealt with that city after they conquered it! I mean, to level it is bad enough, but to even SALT the EARTH, to make sure nothing can grow, is just overkill! Apparently, the Romans justified this behaviour by accusing the Phoenecians of sacrificing their own children, which is not too different from the way Hitler slurred the Jews by trying to accuse them of drinking blood!
Well, sorry for rambling on like that, it's just such a very interesting topic! I agree that the Carthaganians should be called the Phoenecians, and in a second XP I'd like to see the Mayans, the Souix, the Hebrews, the Incans, the Hittites, the Khmer, perhaps the Siamese (Thai) and the Ethiopians.
Yours,
The_Aussie_Lurker.
P.S: I accept that some of my historical points might not be 100% accurate, if I've made any errors, please let me know!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The_Aussie_Lurker
|
|
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
May 2001 time: 05:20
|
|
I am quite certain that the City of Carthage was razed to the ground, not by Vandals, but by the Romans! I'm also very certain that the soldiers went as far as salting the earth after the city was destroyed. It may be possible, however, that the Romans rebuilt the city at a later date stocked, of course, with loyal Roman citizens!
Yours,
The_Aussie_Lurker.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Christantine The Great
|
|
Massachusetts
Jun 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
Crash course in Carthaginian history:
Major colony of the Phonecian city-states until those were subjected by the Persians. When this happened, Carthage took it upon itself to protect the minor Phonecian colonies, which it did. It soon rose to prominance and even circumnavigated Africa. Evidence also suggests that their ships reached Brazil! During the First Punic War, Carthage was deprived of their possessions in Sardinia, Corsica, and Sicily and forbidden to go north of a certain river in Iberia (forgot name). Second Punic War deprived them of everthing but Carthage and their African empire. By then, Carthage was completely beat. Third Punic War utterly destroyed the last of the Carthaginian civilization and they razed the city itself. Romans then rebuilt Carthage a few hundred years later where it was a prominant city until the fall of the Byzantine Exarchate of Carthage to the Arabs. The nearby town Tunis rose to prominance after that. The famous Byzantine Emperor Heraclius was from Carthage.
Coracle, what's the difference between a Tercio and a musketman with a bayonet? Conquistadors were not gung-ho idiots. Do you think Cortez destroyed the Aztec without his careful manipulation of the subjected tribes? And I think there are enough defensive UUs in the game. But a Conquistador really should replace the knight with stats like:
5-2-3. The 3 movement signifies that they had light armor.
I really don't appreciate you parading the Tercio around like it's so magnificently brilliant. It's your pet project and you should treat it as such, not treat it like it's the ultimate truth.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mikhail
|
|
flesh.and.binary
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SwitchMoO
Sorry.
Back on topic, I think Byzantines should be discluded simple for their really close proximity to Rome. It'd be like having, instead of Germany, west and east Germany. THey're just too close, IMHO. |
LOL. Yes, we all know how cultures 1000 years apart are 'too close' to be in, while America and England are 'acceptably different'. I love reading the thrawls of illogic in these forums.
No, Including Byzantium and Rome is not like East and West Germany. It's like including the Vikings and the Russians. The former may have led to the later, but, in time, became very very different.
Anyway, if they made a second expansion, it would HAVE to include both Byzantium and Thailand/Siam.
Other civs I'd include:
Incas
Mayans
Tibetans
Also, South East Asian countries are very different from each other, even more so than North East Asia, so it would be entirely plausible for Firaxis to have Vietnam in there, as well as Thailand.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Christantine The Great
|
|
Massachusetts
Jun 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
I don't know why people debate the fact that the Americans are in CivIII. There is NO logic, so why try to find some?
I attribute it to penis envy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Christantine The Great
|
|
Massachusetts
Jun 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
That's what I've been arguing, but to no avail.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Alex
|
 |
Brasil
Mar 1999 time: 02:20
|
|
I don't think that a second XP would include as many civs as the first one. They would probably add just two more civs... the Portuguese and the Dutch, I think.
If a second XP ever sees the light of day, I'd like it to add a lot of fluff (wonder movies, animated council, 3D terrain, a separate battle screen, an animated city view, a more interesting message system [using stone tablets and newspapers], voiceovers and... hmmm... wait a minute, I'm talking about civ4! Firaxis, take note.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Amadan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alexnm
If a second XP ever sees the light of day, I'd like it to add a lot of fluff (wonder movies, animated council, 3D terrain, a separate battle screen, an animated city view, a more interesting message system [using stone tablets and newspapers], voiceovers and... hmmm... wait a minute, I'm talking about civ4! Firaxis, take note.) |
Less fluff, more substance.
(Buildings, wonders, customization options...)
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|