 |
Who should be the Minister of Finance?
This poll is closed. |
| civman2000 |
   |
34 |
61.82% |
| atawa |
   |
2 |
3.64% |
| jdjdjd |
   |
3 |
5.45% |
| johncmcleod |
   |
16 |
29.09% |
| Total: |
55 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Moral Hazard
|
 |
of jack
Jul 1999 time: 01:20
|
|
Edit: ATAWA HAS DROPPED OUT OF THE RACE FOR THIS POSITION Hopefully people will scroll far enough down to see this.
I really like your new avatar Trip.
John Mc is in the lead.
Last edited by Moral Hazard on 16-06-2002 at 07:06
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sheik
|
|
I voted civman. He will do a really good job and is very active in the forums.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Timeline
|
 |
Sunshine State, USA
Nov 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
Ok, nothing against Civman but I am voting for John and here's why:
I don't think luxuries should be used ever ever ever! Well ok, maybe sometimes, like if war wariness is setting in and you want to trade-off commerce for productivity. But it should NEVER be used as a common method of managing entertainers, and i think we all know that....except civman.
So, I mean, what good is an expert Science Advisor and pro City Planner if someone doesn't manage the Slider right? Now yea, we all say, "Come on, the slider isn't that hard to manage " Yup, that's true, but the way Civman is talking has me wondering if he won't mess everyone up with the slider.
Take a look in the campaign thread and you will see that John does know what he is talking about (dispite what Civman would have you think). I believe John will do us a pretty good job, and give us the science rates we need.
Last edited by Timeline on 16-06-2002 at 10:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Timeline
|
 |
Sunshine State, USA
Nov 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by civman2000
My Promises: but if we can gain 30 gold per turn at the cost of only 2 turns for science I say do it! |
The Science Advisor will hate him 
Sir Ralph: I am not really understanding you, by raising luxuries he will be cutting into the science budget in order to free up entertainers, either to grow cities, or to make more shields, correct?
This is totally pointless imho because it will make cities grow bigger and make more unhappy citizens, and also it will slow our science advancement and turn us into a backward people.
So you are saying that he should put that 10% to income, to support our armies. Well, I think it's obvious that he will support our armies, or els he will be running a defecit. 10% luxuries is actually making him pro military, as it shows he supports building armies faster, but the positive side to this is that we could build happiness improvements faster too, and hopefully be able to eliminate the 10% luxury after a time....
Oh well, as a builder/science advocate I support John more. Civmans ideas are just pretty wacked as a whole as far as I am concerned.
Last edited by Timeline on 16-06-2002 at 17:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:20
|
|
I am not against playing with the luxury slider, not at all. But saying, I will set luxuries to 10% "as soon as cities grow to size 10" is the wrong way. Here's why:
It may be really free up entertainers, but don't forget, that these citizens will produce not only shields, but also food (unless they work in deserts or mountains, that is). This will make the cities grow again, and a few turns after it, the same unhappiness problem stands again. What shall we do then? Again raise the luxury slider? Starve the city down? Or make entertainers? That could we have had earlier, without spending lots of money for luxuries.
Another reason: The luxury spending goes not only in the big cities, that need it, but also by percentage in small jungle or desert cities, or totally corrupt border cities, that shouldn't grow much anyway. A waste again? I say yes.
It's much cheaper to get the happy faces out of luxury resources. So we don't have enough? Support a big military, and send the bad boys out to get some. So our big cities can't grow anymore? Build a cathedral. And during its construction stop the growth by making an entertainer, but only in cities that need it. This is IMHO the right way.
The only two legitimate reasons to play with the luxury slider are, if we are alone on an island or a small continent and can't have more luxuries by conquest. In this case supporting a big military would be pointless, until we discover Navigation. The second reason is, to fight war weariness temporary in a republic or democracy.
Timeline: That was meant ironically .
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|