 |
|  |
 |
|
nostromo
|
 |
Montréal, Québec
Mar 2002 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by sboog
This may surprise some of you, but I still play Civ1 ! I never liked Civ2. There is just something magic (even though primitive by Civ3 standards) about Civ1.
sboog |
You're not the only one. Bruce Shelley, of Age of Empire fame, has stated that he prefers Civ1. And I'll venture that Jeff Briggs, the lead designer of Civ3, also prefers Civ1. And, IIRC, Civ3 was supposed to be a return to the spirit of Civ 1, a simple, fun, light-hearted game. I wonder, do you prefer Civ3 to Civ2?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Coracle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nato
I don't care about scenarios or MP, so for me there is no big reason to play Civ2 instead of 3.
Civ2 does have some minor features that are better, like more buildings and terraforming, and some other things. But none of those are as big as the improved AI and the new culture in Civ3, among other things. |
Both the Civ 3 AI, and Culture Flipping, stink like old poop.
One of the better things about Civ 3 (and there aren't that many) is, well, give me time and I'll think of one. . .
Civ 2 was more fun, and the AI wasn't in your face.
Scenarios were a nearly vital part of Civ 2, and their absence in Civ 3 is a major flaw if not a rip off.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
aebrahim
|
|
I jumped straight from Civ1 to Civ3. I bought Civ2, but I never really liked it much. Civ1 was the best back in its time, though after playing Civ3 I wouldn't want to go back again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sboog
|
 |
Georgia, USA
Mar 2001 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nostromo
You're not the only one. Bruce Shelley, of Age of Empire fame, has stated that he prefers Civ1. And I'll venture that Jeff Briggs, the lead designer of Civ3, also prefers Civ1. And, IIRC, Civ3 was supposed to be a return to the spirit of Civ 1, a simple, fun, light-hearted game. I wonder, do you prefer Civ3 to Civ2? |
I definately prefer Civ3 to Civ2.
Right now I am playing more Civ3 than Civ1, but you are so right. Civ1 really had a simple, fun spirit and I think Civ3 captures some of that spirit.
sboog
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ColdWizard
|
|
only civ2. i played civ3 briefly, but grew bored of it (quit playing just before the first patch and haven't played since). i find civ2 to be more enjoyable due to scenarios and multiplayer, but also for a nice quiet game without having the ai plop down cities all over, under, inbetween, around, and jammed in sidewise...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Papa Chubby
|
|
Iceland
Jun 2002 time: 05:20
|
|
I play both games, love them both. Civ2 mainly because of all the different scenarios that add to the experience of playing it. I also agree that the AI is much better on Civ3 than Civ2, the so-called settler-diarrhea. Well its just fine by me, I thought the lack of expansion of AI civilisations in Civ2 to be very irritating. Their lack of size and the ease with which you could eventually dominate by sheer numbers was something that had to be improved, something that they did admirably.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sugar daddy
|
|
hmmm.. civI... had almost forgotten that one. Is it shareware now ? cant believe they would accept money for a 10 year old game or....?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|