 |
|
tniem
|
|
Hope College
Apr 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
Not to rain on your parade Asher but may I ask why if you are a legal purchaser of WarCraft III you would want to do this. I mean if you legally own the game then why not use the dedicated servers that Blizzard has set up?
Of course, if you have not legally purchased the game then I see a reason...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SnowFire
|
 |
New York City, NY
Jan 1970 time: 00:20
|
|
battle.net is good?! I always thought it was terrible. Having been used to bungie.net's easy as pie way to find good games and players, it's far more annoying on battle.net... the worst thing by far is that after the game is over, everybody immediately breaks up. Plus, if your team is defeated (or yourself without teams), you just get kicked out of the game. This makes it hard to set up games based on a group of fun players, not off a certain map. I mean, you can't even change the map or settings once you've started a Blizzard game, which is utterly ridiculous, and assumes that people joined my game to play a map, not to play with me.
So you have to do all that by hand. I say, just play War3 in the CS lab on a nice and fast LAN with people who are actually fun to play with.
Anyway, it may be worth a try. Are the people on Kali less lame than people on b.net?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Triped
|
|
Caledonia, Illinois, USA
Sep 2001 time: 23:20
|
|
bnet would be good if Blizzard cut out the free crap and charged a few bucks for the online service. The benefits are two-fold:
a) More money for better service/more games
b) Gets rid of the riffraff that lags it up in the first place.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|