 |
|  |
 |
|
NorthSwordsman
|
|
I brought up this idea at Civgaming.net, got only one response, I would like your input as well.
The game has Subs, then Nuke Subs (SSN's). The SSN's can only carry one TacNuke (similar to a TLAM-N (which is a Tomahawk Nuclear tipped land attack missle, essentially a nuke cruise missle).
I was thinking of the concept of SSBNs in our world today, which carry 24 or more SLBMs (sea-launched ICBMs).
Would it, in your opinion, be unbalanced having an SSBN carrying 8 ICBMs or Tlam-Ns?
Before you start thinking about that, consider this:
The USA SSN-688 class (some variants) has room for something like up to 12 missle tubes, which means it can carry 12 tac nukes, or 12 regular tomahawks. In Civ3, it is limited to 1.
Opinions, please. Would the AI be able to make effective use of this, and would it be unbalanced, or should the current SSN in C3 be modified to carry 8 tac nukes or cruise missles?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
Well, it would be good for color, but I dont really see the point of launching ICBMs from submarines (in the game, i mean, if course), if i understand you correctly. I say this because ICBMs can hit any pooint on the map, so it really doesn't matter if they are luanched fro the city where they're built or from a sub.
I do think the nuclear subs in the game should be able to carry more tactical nukes, though, and I have edited the unit accordingly. I have yet to see if a 3 missile payload unbalances the game or not, and if the ai can use it correctly.
Kman
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|