 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
The problem isn't with Islam, per se, but how it is interpreted and practiced. In Europe, Serbian Muslims (aka Bosnians) were quite Westernized and moderate. There was a trend label, ironically enough, secular Islam, which was growing through most of this century, but was ultimately destroyed by the West because it was not sufficiently anti-Communist enough.
However, lest we think this is a problem merely with Islam, let us remember that there are fundimentalist Jewish kooks who would like to make Israel a theocracy. There are people in the US, followers of a nut called Rev. Rashdoon, who want the US to become a Biblical kingdon, where the Bible is law. The Hindu nationalists in India are just as bad as the fundimentalist Moslems.
The problem is Islam, it's religious extremism, which knows no religious boundries.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:20
|
|
same with Turkey and even all the other countries. muslim fundamentalism dosen't exist as state attitude (no, not even in Iraq you monger)(OK, it does in Iran though), so it's all geopolitical nonsernse.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I agree with che who spoke as if he was in the balkans.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Monk
|
|
I don't think we're in Brønshøj anymore
Jan 1970 time: 06:20
|
|
Of course there are extreme jackasses everywhere, but my world view remains rotated around myself and the society I live in, and in that regard, fundamentalist Jews or Hindus just don't constitute a problem. The Muslim who shouted "hooker" at girls I know because their faces weren't covered or the Muslims who threw rocks against this year's gay parade constitute a problem because I have to live around them.
Imran, you're fully aware that just because you can get X number of people to agree with a package of ideas, it doesn't mean it can't be highly repressive in nature. Soviet-style communism was the best example, but we can both think of more. Most of these Africans don't posses the same individualism that we do, and there are countless factors at play here apart from the nature of the ideology to which they subscribe. I can't grasp how you can support political ideas of libertarian nature while at the same time be supporting a religion where the church and state are inseperable and prefabricated laws are putting severe restrictions on individual opportunities for development, such as legislation denying 50% of the population the same rights as the rest.
When that's said, do you have any comments on the first stuff I wrote?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Monk
Of course this is a valid point, but as far as I know, the Koran is per definition the inerrant word of God, word for word, whereas the widespread Christian perception of the Bible is different. Sure, the Bible is also supposed to be God's message to mankind, but it's generally agreed upon that it's authored by people, not God himself. This also means you can attribute some parts of the Bible to the society in which it was written, whereas the very word of God per definition would apply equally much today as it did in the days of Muhammad.
|
THere are Muslims that believe the Koran was divinely inspired but flawed by the nature of the vessel that translated it into the words of man. Or something like that - I'm paraphrasing something an older gent told me a few years ago. Anyway, you can hardly say that all Muslims are fundamentalists. And you can hardly say that it is generally agreed that the Bible is not the literal word of God. The Southern Baptists are literalists. As, I believe, are the Roman Catholics, according to strict church doctrine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:20
|
|
Dalgetti, that they called themselves Yugoslav doesn't mean enlightenment and peace and prosperity, it means opportunism. It's soemthing that doesn't surprise me. Today they have a strong leader and like the idea of peace, tomorrow, without that leader, with socialism crumbled, they prefer nationalism. It's sad, but it never had a future if you ask me. Not on the Balkans anyway. And this is not racism, it's realism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Monk
|
|
I don't think we're in Brønshøj anymore
Jan 1970 time: 06:20
|
|
Echinda,
OK, maybe not generally accepted. My viewpoint was slightly disturbed by the fact that I live in a country where 80% are members of a Protestant Christian church, but I've only met ten people or so, ever, who thought the Bible was to be taken absolutely literal. The point remains that the symbolic, more abstract interpretation comes more natural to Christians than Muslims.
And no, don't get me wrong - far from all Muslims are fundamentalists, but for the above mentioned reasons, I reckon there's a need for concern. As for the "flawed by the nature of the vessel" thing, I figure there could be people believing that - however, the vessel in question was an archangel, and I wouldn't expect that many Muslims to accept the statement the archangel would screw up. The Koran is the exact word of God and God's language is Arabic - the Koran says so, whereas the Bible doesn't - and that's the reason Muslims don't like using the term "translation" when it comes to translating God's word into other languages, whereas Christians don't have similar objections.
Imran,
I remember your origins are Pakistani and you were a Muslim back in the old days - I take your comment as an indicator you've changed your faith since then?
Religious beliefs can and are totally seperate from political beliefs.
They can and they should be. I'm simply pointing out that when it comes to religious loonies, I'd much rather have Christians than Muslims, because whether you admit it or not, the Koran preaches politics to a large degree whereas Jesus didn't.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:20
|
|
stop blahing around... do they keep women down in Turkey?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:20
|
|
You have Turkish friends? Last time I checked you hate them.
Besides, you should better keep your body hair down before you talk about others keeping their women down.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: I remember your origins are Pakistani and you were a Muslim back in the old days - I take your comment as an indicator you've changed your faith since then? |
You've been away for a while haven't you?
quote: They can and they should be. I'm simply pointing out that when it comes to religious loonies, I'd much rather have Christians than Muslims, because whether you admit it or not, the Koran preaches politics to a large degree whereas Jesus didn't. |
Maybe so, but also remember where Islam is time-wise. It is around 1400 years of the religion. Where was Christianity then? Wasn't the state controlled by the religion. Weren't Popes the most powerful people in Europe, which could tell Kings what to do? Weren't women 2nd class citizens?
Give Islam some time. It is active and growing, which means you have fanatics.
quote: well , if they don't believe in the keeping down of women , they're not real believing muslims , heh ? |
Not so. Muhammed himself said that men should have their wives be their equals. He preached a LOT against the lowering of Arab women. Unfortunetly a religon can't totally uproot centuries of a certain practice (ie, making women less then men). If you look at Muslims in other areas, like, say... Pakistan. Women don't have to be covered from head to toe. Most of them wear head scarves, but that is because it is so bleeding hot there!! Hell, they even elected a woman Prime Minister!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:20
|
|
why are Islamists lesser of two evils? you mean in Turkey? that's possible, but why are they better than military leaders?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
a nazi like yourself shouldnt care ecthelinaki
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnIII
|
|
Monk, just because the Qu'ran is the literal word of god does not mean that the meaning isn't interpreted differently by different people. You seem to be assuming that:
a) it's easy to understand,
b) all Muslims understand it,
c) all Muslims interpret it the same way,
d) that Islam should be exempt from nutjobs because its holy book is supposed to be the words of god. The 10 Commandments are also supposed to be the words of god, and yet many Christians disobey at least one of them.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|