 |
|
Al'Kimiya
|
|
How come (nearly?) only poor and uneducated people convert to islam?
I predict a divided world, with a working "slave"-class consisting of mainly moslems and a ruling class of western/non-moslem asiatic people.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:20
|
|
I aim to please, Dal. Now why are you using a pic of Boris Y as an avatar icon?
Are you also fat and constantly drunk?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Imran , your theory is not realistic. The enviroments, and the technological evolution stages are rather different, to say the least. I clearly see the secularisation in Europe a part of the exploration of the new world, and the printing press. Your analisys doesn't take all those endless criteria into account. |
It doesn't have to take that into account. The secularisation of Europe would have happened even with out the exploration of the New World and in fact was happening before it. Check out the Hussite revolts. Luther's ideals weren't based on discoveries though the printing press did help to get his ideas out to many people. The same basic pattern fits. I see this same pattern for Islam, of openness at the beginning, to totalitarian thinking in the middle (ie, now), to secularism and openness in the end.
The Church didn't fall because of the printing press and discoveries in the New World. The Church fell because it was alienating the people with its old rules and ideas. Because of its corruptness and idiocy, and many Muslims are also becoming disenchanted with radicals. The only problem is the West is stoking up these fires by seeming making Islam the enemy, allowing the fundamentals to rally around the religion. But soon, it too will become fringed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:20
|
|
lol, it never was
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Al'Kimiya
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dalgetti
Al'Kimiya: that will never happen . A war between US+Russia and a few Islamic countries is possible. Remember , we're playing with nukes here. |
I wasn't talking about war. I meant large parts of the third world will become moslem, meaning more moslem refugees to western countries, meaning larger percent moslem populations in these countries. The integration policies in the west doesn't work very well, thus the refugee imigrants become lower "class" and if they get any jobs it probably won't be very good jobs...
Isn't this the situation in Israel today. Arabs from the poor territories having poorly paid jobs in Israel proper. Well.. at least up until a few weeks ago. This situation could spread to the entire west.
Edit - moslem refugees that is..
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnIII
|
|
Yes! And all the Asians who came to Britain ended up in the lower classes. Apart from all the doctors, and succesful businessmen...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Al'Kimiya
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnIII
Yes! And all the Asians who came to Britain ended up in the lower classes. Apart from all the doctors, and succesful businessmen... |
But the non-moslem Asians haven't islamic traditions "preventing" them from becoming successful. So in the not so distant future, the lower classes will be mostly moslem. Perhaps even poor Asians converting in the dark alleys of London.
Like say the caste-less hindus converting to Islam in India. "At least it's better than this..."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnIII
|
|
Muhammed Al Fayed is hardly unsuccessful now, is he?
From a Datamonitor report last year: 'Britain may have well over 5000 Muslim millionaires with liquid assets of more than £3.6bn. Their wealth will make them among the most sought after customers by Britain's financial services sector…the market for Islamic* finance in the UK is set to grow hugely.'
* According to the Sharia?
It's funny, because if you were talking about Jews that way, you'd have about fifty responses calling you a Jew-hater and an anti-semite, quite rightly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:20
|
|
Obviously we can't just paint a billion people with the same brush we use for Bin Laden and his ilk. Not only is it bigoted to do so, it is inaccurate. That said I am not nearly as upbeat as either Imran or the author of this piece. As for Imran's theory of religious history, even if it is correct it is of little relevance to us that in a few hundred years Islam will start to mellow out. Right now there are more than enough fanatics to be a real problem for a sizable chunk of the globe.
For whatever reason the areas where Islam holds sway tend to not only be the areas that are amongst the most backward on the planet, they also seem to be resistent to what we in the west call progress. Political and economic stagnation both seem to strengthen religious institutions, and in many areas of the Islamic world these religious institutions tend to be reactionary, which feeds back into political and economic stagnation. While this does vary regionally to some extent (ie some areas of the Islamic world have a long and successful political and / or economic tradition), the performance of Islam as a whole seems to suggest that the religion itself lends itself to this painful feeback loop more than most others. I think that Monk hits on some good points in this regard. For instance the Islamic world tends to be pretty wealthy in oil, which should provide a very welcome helping hand to their economies by providing them with a secure source of capital to develop internal markets. Yet the performance of the Arab oil states has been pitiful, with oil revenue used to prop up outmoded forms of government rather than developing new economic activities with which to diversify their economies. Indonesia's performance has not been much better even though it's regional variation and cultural history should have given it a leg up on the Arabs in this regard.
While on the whole the rest of the world is getting wealthier and more free, the opposite is true of the Islamic world. This troubling tendency is coupled with another one, which is the population growth of the Islamic world, which accounts for the vast majority of the growth of the religion, whatever fairly minor gains are made in Africa notwithstanding. I'm afraid that things are going to continue to get worse before they get better, not because I am an expert on Islam, but mainly because I have only observed a continuing decline in the status of Muslims throughout my life. As troubled as Africa is, I honestly have more hope for that region than I do for the Islamic world because I do see some progress in Africa over time. Eventually the secular governments which we in the west have been happy to have holding back the tide of the more radical elements in Islamic society are going to fall. This will be a dangerous time, but hopefully one of opportunity as well. I only hope that Islamicist governance will prove the limitations of that approach without proving to be as despotic and stubborn as the current secular and Islamicist regimes are.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|