 |
|
Civfan
|
|
Toronto, Canada
Sep 1999 time: 05:20
|
|
On instructions from the emperor of the Austrian-Hungarian empire, the President of Austria proposes a non-aggression pact with Britain and France.
Austria wishes to remain neatrul in this conflict between France and Britain but urges both countries to construct a workable peace arrangement. Maybe payments of gold to each nation and withdraw of Britain of French soldiers.
End of statement
In a statement on comment made by Russia against the Austrian-Hungarian empire, President Civfan states.
'So since Russia doesn't have the means to make an invasion of Asia Minor, does that mean Asia Minor is still open to all? First come first served?'
End of Statement.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
We have no immediate means to invade Asia Minor, but if you invade it it might have consequences for your nation. We are attacking Constantinopol right now, and once it is taken we will have an acces point to Asia Minor and will begin it's invasion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darius871
|
 |
Smith, Wesson, and the RODINA!!!
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
Asia minor is for you two to figure out. However I suggest North Africa be simply up for grabs for all.
As for a "reasonable" peace, France finds it unthinkable to allow a defeated and vengeful Britain to remain on our flank. The only situation I envision in which Britain would be allowed complete autonomy would involve massive demilitarisations, most importantly of their navy. It took a lot of work to create the capability to invade Britain, and I do not want to have to undertake such a daunting task a second time if they backstab me.
Although it is far too early to discuss this issue anyhow as Britain is in no way defeated, these are the only terms of peace France would ever accept:
1) The scuttling of the entire British Navy. It would be asking too much for them to hand their ships over to France; disbanding them would be sufficient. Furthermore, no more ships other than transports would be built after that point.
2) Yes, the handover of Hannover, likely to be partitioned between France and Prussia.
3) Even during peacetime the cities of Dover, Norwich, and Portsmouth would be permanently under French occupation, thereby neutralizing Britain's advantage of isolation by sea, a fact which would deter her from attempting to get revenge against France.
Nothing else would be necessary. I am not bent on conquest of Britain; my interest is in preventing an autonomous future Britain from striking back at me, an interest which these terms fulfill. If they are indeed unacceptable to Russia, then I suppose she can reconsider as she wishes. I hope for peace in Europe as you all do, but the fact is that such a peace will be hard to maintain with a completely intact Britain which would feel unrestricted due to isolation provided by water and warships.
As for Spain, it would be impractical for Britain to play it at any time since they are at war with Britain... I guess I could stand having the other three players do it but they too could always have conflicts of interest. Also Spain would be militarily impotent because its grand strategies would change each and every turn.
Last edited by Darius871 on 03-08-2002 at 10:02
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darius871
|
 |
Smith, Wesson, and the RODINA!!!
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
Well actually I haven't coordinated attacks at all nor will I; there aren't even any French troops in Spain. And meanwhile I haven't done eanything even remotely close to purposefully weakening Spain and/or using its units far more liberally than French troops since Spain is not my civ. I hold their soldiers and sailors to the highest standard, and I am currently building countless city improvements in the country (primariliy foundries) to give them better capability i nthe long term. I've played two players before, and I know how to be objective with them.
This is moot anyhow; of course Britain would not want me playing Spain, because they know that if the AI did it there would be dozens of Spanish ships stupidly all around to pick off with ease. He speaks of unfair advantage; well I say that an AI Spain is an unfair advantage for him. It would be equivalent to Britain and Prussia in their new alliance making war with us, but with their Prussian ally being doomed to certain destruction because I demanded that they be AI.
If you really think that I would stoop so low as to be unfair with my use of Spain, then fine; I have no problem with someone new play them. What I will not accept is an AI control so bloody stupid it is literally useless. You would sink the entire Spanish Navy in three turns or less because of its suicidally poor AI player. Does this in any way sound reasonable to you?
Also, it is not forbidden to speak with Spain at the moment (unless something's broken) as just this last turn I was able to secure full Spanish commitment against Britain by negotiating with the AI. On a separate note I also gifted Spain all my techs. Why the hell would I do that if I were unfairly weakening her for our coming war?
quote: We furthermore hope monarchs of other countries will realize how dangerous such French warmongering is for the stability of Europe and will join us in our fight so once again peace can be established. |
Where is this goddam warmongering you speak of? As shown by my earlier post we want peace as much as you do if not more, but to secure French safety we want it to be a stable peace where a warmongering Britain would not be able to continually threaten us. Their only true mission is to prevent the spread of humanist and democratic ideals throughout Europe. History proves that the side which knowingly fights for autocracy and opression will always lose. Britain willl continue to spew propagandist lies about their making war in order to bring peace (how ironic), when their true goal is simply the destruction of France as a power, and they don't care how many Prussian, Russian, or Austrian young men they must sacrifice to complete the task.
She acts as if the "fall" of Britain would mean a domino effect in central and eastern Europe. But how would I even ever dare undertake such an immense task when I am not even going to completely invade Britain? All I am going to do is secure a few ports there to be able to deter them from continued warmongering. Their accusations are completely groundless for I have never shown that I have the manpower or even the intent to "conquer" "Prussia, then Austria, then Russia". I have no desire to "conquer" anybody, only to make a peace with Great Britain which neccesity will make them unable to break in the future.
This French warmongering is a myth. If I were a warlike megalomaniac I would want every British city on the globe under my control. Rather all I am doing is defending my country from continued aggression from Great Britain. It's just that this time I will "defend" by taking away our enemy's capability to make war and be sure that they will have to keep the peace that they PRETEND to want.
Last edited by Darius871 on 03-08-2002 at 18:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darius871
|
 |
Smith, Wesson, and the RODINA!!!
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
Do you think I want to invade Britain and Prussia? I don't even want to invade Britain!
And yes, it is a completely normal concept to make small advances and fortify in a defensive war. Look at World War II; Britain and the U.S. invaded in a war in which Britain and its allies were attacked and invaded (or invasion was attempted anyhow). It was not a war in which Britain was on the offensive from the get-gol rather they simply knew that the only way to defend was the extinguish the enemy's ability to offend in the future. Or you could look at the Napoleonic Wars of reality. The nations that had defended themselves agreed that the last act of defense would be the destructio of the enemy's offensive capability through offensive operations.
That is the nature of this war as well; defensive offense. Only noted desires of an intent to subjugate all British cities would say that I was fighting an "offensive" war, but there have been none. THe mere fact that troops rae on the offensive does not mean that a nation hoped to conquer all that it sees.
BTW the Civ AI is truly useless. I completely quit playing single player long ago because it is so stupid. All it knows is to destroy any enemy units in sight, rather than plan specific and successful offensives. They consistently leave units alone in vulnerable places, and also inexplicably place them in areas where they are of no use to them (i.e. mountains or the Sahara).
Last edited by Darius871 on 03-08-2002 at 19:25
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
If France continues to insist on the peace treaty they showed above Russia will break it's treaty with France, becasue what France is doing is not preserving peace, but eliminating the competition.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Civfan
|
|
Toronto, Canada
Sep 1999 time: 05:20
|
|
just curious to know but whos turn is it? I think its Prussia!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
As of right now, no treaties exist between Russia and France. Russia warns France that if they continue their agression against other countries in Europe, Russia will take messures against France
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
We do not want to see Western Europe dominated by France. We sucgest that a peace be signed, on terms, like Honnover to France, and Portugal to Spain, or something close to that. That is of cource if Britain agrees. As of right now Russia will stay neutral, but we do not like the war, and if it goes on for too long we will interfere.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Civfan
|
|
Toronto, Canada
Sep 1999 time: 05:20
|
|
Hi did Smaug disappear? Its his turn right?
hmm
|
|
|  |
 |
|
von Blücher
|
|
good old Germany
Jul 2002 time: 06:20
|
|
Ok I send Smaug a PM hope he will continue to play soon and when he returns and we find nobody else for Spain it's also ok for me if Darius play Spain too as I don't want to block this game.
Furthermore I cannot accept the so-called "solution". Why should I give up all my territory. If I hand over Pórtugal and MY German possessions, what’s left? Stormbringer was right: France tries to cripple Britain as much as possible and afterwards put a harsh treaty on us. This is really nothing else than eliminating the competition. We are a peaceloving nation and we are committed to peace but not for the price of self-destruction.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
It is just a proposal. If Britain does not sees it fair, then the war will go on. We just do not want France to try to make peace where Britain would be totaly cripled, and France would rule western Europe
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
Who's turn is it? Smaug's? What should we do if he doesn't show up?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
FürstMetternich
|
|
Hi everyone! May I take over Prussia if he doesn't come back?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
yes, you can have Prussi, if he doesn't show up in 2 days
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
I will be gone for three weeks starting today. Anyone who subs for Russia needs to move troops to Finland, and to the south, attack Constantinopol, and cities around it, and keep fighting in the Caucuss(sp?) mountains. I will be back on teh 29th
|
|
|  |
 |
|
von Blücher
|
|
good old Germany
Jul 2002 time: 06:20
|
|
Thank you for the information. So do you think we can sub for him or is it better if we find someone from outside?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
I think it will be fine if civfan subs for me. He is Austria, and is going to attack Balkhans too, so it should not be a problem
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Civfan
|
|
Toronto, Canada
Sep 1999 time: 05:20
|
|
ok will do so
need password
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stormbringer
|
|
I did not put the password on, so you don't need it
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|