 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:20
|
|
I never managed to grasp the economy and science part. I never really tried though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nostromo
|
 |
Montréal, Québec
Mar 2002 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Is this a realistic strategy game? And historically correct? |
First of all, you should get Europa Universalis 2 (EU2). It's better. Civ is a strategy game with an historical theme. It doesn't seriously intend to simulate history. EU, on the other hand, does intend to simulate a portion of history. And IMO it does a fairly good job on that score.
I enjoy it, but I'm not gaga. I don't play it often. For one, games take eons to finish (they are much longer than Civ3 games) and, a bit too often for my taste, there's not much for you to do.
quote: Does it require intensive of manual reading? Is there an online manual somewhere? |
Huge learning curve. You definitely have to read the manual. Moreover, since the manual doesn't say everything, you will have to consult the EU message forums
|
|
|  |
 |
|
thinkingamer
|
|
quote: Is this a realistic strategy game? And historically correct? |
Well, the Korean golden age was in early-middle 15th century, but in EU2, there are about only 100,000 people in Korea......at late 16th century, Korea was declined a bit (which means no significant pop. growth), and had about 50,000 soldiers, but in my estimation the Korean gov't in late 16th cent. could support up to 200,000 soldiers (but barely) and also provably had well over 1 million men that could fight in a war (if trained).
Conclusion? If i were u would not trust EU2's historical accuracy outside of Europe and America.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rune
|
 |
Trondheim
Jan 1970 time: 06:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ThePlagueRat
Hi. I have heard some rumors about this game, mostly positive,
but I've got some questions to ask you too:
Is this a realistic strategy game? And historically correct?
Is it also fun?
Does it require intensive of manual reading?
Is there an online manual somewhere?
Ok, Just tell us something about it... |
First off, you'll want the sequel, EU2, and be sure to apply the latest patch (currently 1.05). It's basically the same game as EU, but with a lot of improvements.
While it's not 100% realistic and historically correct, it is the most realistic and historically correct strategy game I've ever played.
It's fun, all right. My favourite strategy game!
While you learn a lot from the manual, it's not actually that good. The tutorial teaches the basics, but you need to play a couple of games before you really get into it. It is one of the most complex games out there, but it is definately worth it.
The message boards at www.europa-universalis.com is an excellent place to get info about every aspect of the game.
About the game:
It is not a civ-like game. You do not start from scratch with a civilization. It's based on historical scenarios, and the main scenario, the grand campaign, spans 400 years. You can be one of about 200 nations, and all these nations exist in the game at the same time (not just 7 as in certain other games )
At first it's best to play one of the "superpowers", but later when you get experienced it's great fun to play as a minor country like Baden, Myanmar or The Knights of St. John.
Higly recommended!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|