 |
|
G.S. boy
|
|
I think you should be able to negotiate terms of surrender. For example, you declared war on a rival empire, destroyed there army and there ability to collect resources (lumbermills, mines, etc.). You've killed many of their peasants, and have there cities surrounded. You can then demand resources land and resources without capturing their capital city. This would give the game more depth and provide the player with an option besides capturing the enemies capital city.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tniem
|
|
Hope College
Apr 2000 time: 00:21
|
|
How do these negotiations work in the context of RTS? Do you go into a pause mode? Is it fast?
I am just wondering how exactly this works. In most RTS, you can do all of this, there just isnt a bargaining table other than typing messages. It sounds like this is different. How is it being implemented? Any ideas since I don't think Graham is at liberty to say.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Starspangled
|
|
How "smart" are the computer players when you're making deals?
If they are stupid like they are in SWGB & AoK than you should fix them.
Here's a list of things AI should be able to do:
-Make good deals
-Accept good deals
-Know when to make deals (if they are almost dead that would be a good time to make a deal)
-Combine efforts with players they are alied with to provide coordinated attacks
One good thing a player could do in a treaty is give tribute (resources) that would otherwise be lost, while they could strain to make one final army.
Also the winning player would not need to keep tabs on the new city/buildings
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|