 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Carver
|
 |
reprocessing plutonium, Yongbyon, NK
Jan 2002 time: 23:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Fez
Carver, if food imports are cheap then why aren't African countries buying more? Boom. I just shot your argument down. |
From fao.org June 14, 2002 Rome:
"NEPAD identifies agriculture as a priority sector," Mr Mbeki, said. In 2000, Africa spent US$18.7 billion on food imports and received 2.8 million tonnes of food aid, more than 25 percent of the world total for that year.
According to FAO, the agricultural sector in Africa accounts for about 60 percent of the total labour force, 20 percent of total merchandise exports and 17 percent of the GDP. Because agriculture plays such a critical role in the African economy, developing a healthy agricultural sector is a precondition for further economic development.
"Until the incidence of hunger is brought down and the import bill reduced by raising the output of farm products, there is no way in which the high rates of economic growth to which NEPAD aspires can be attained," according to the FAO/NEPAD joint Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) report.
As you can see Africa spending $18.7 billion US on food imports every year is seriously crippling. Unfortunately, US leaders would rather dole out the 2.8 million tonnes of food aid than engage in free market reforms that would enable Africa to grow more, thus improving Africa's balance of trade and making the target of 7% growth per annum more feasable. America needs to practice what it preaches and trust the markets.

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Carver
|
 |
reprocessing plutonium, Yongbyon, NK
Jan 2002 time: 23:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Fez
Oh they are? Then where is this food going to? The tinpot dictators of most of these countries and their ruling elite.
7% growth per annum is highly illogical. No way that will ever happen. Not with the corruption there now.
Mozambique is probably the only country to attain that and will be the only one. |
Fez, your brush, which is apparently wide enough to stretch from Dakar to Addis Ababa, is not being used wisely. To simply paint every African government as corrupt and paint corruption as the root of every problem is misleading to the point of being libelous. Is there corruption? ....sure. But the disparate terms of trade imposed on Africa by the West is clearly one of the continent's biggest problem.
I would do a rethink before calling the Obasanjo, Kufour, Wade, Mkapa and Mwanawasa governments (in Abuja, Accra, Dakar, Dodoma and Lusaka, respectively) corrupt.
And yes Mozambique's performance (now that South African commanded rebels have stoped blowing things up) has been very stong, 8% last year and the latest figures look like 15%. But it is hardly "illogical" for other nations to hit the 7% target. Tanzania, Ghana, Uganda and Botswana have been consistently strong performers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Giancarlo
|
 |
Los Angeles
Apr 2000 time: 02:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Carver
Fez, your brush, which is apparently wide enough to stretch from Dakar to Addis Ababa, is not being used wisely. |
And I stand corrected, because there are the few governments that actually are not that corrupt.
quote:
To simply paint every African government as corrupt and paint corruption as the root of every problem is misleading to the point of being libelous. |
I didn't say every. I said most in Africa. The corruption is deep and any loans are misused.
quote:
Is there corruption? ....sure. But the disparate terms of trade imposed on Africa by the West is clearly one of the continents biggest problem. |
MASSIVE corruption in most countries throughout Africa. That is the biggest problem. Don't go blaming the west when the problem is infact in the governments in Africa themselves... well at least most of them.
quote:
I would do a rethink before calling the Obasanjo, Kufour, Wade, Mkapa and Mwanawasa governments (in Abuja, Accra, Dakar, Dodoma and Lusaka, respectively) corrupt. |
Obasanjo? Am I hearing right? His government is literally tainted with corruption.
quote:
And yes Mozambique's performance (now that South African commanded rebels have stoped blowing things up) has been very stong, 8% last year and the latest figures look like 15%. But it is hardly "illogical" for other nations to hit the 7% target. Tanzania, Uganda and Botswana have been consistently strong performers. |
Mozambique somehow developed a highly transparent government where corruption won't taint the economic picture. Tanzania, Uganda and Botswana... but what about all of the other nations? And those three you named have high aids infection rates which could cause massive implication to economic performance.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|