Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Civ3-General-Archive > A neat Idea for mounted units, possibly for Civ4
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 24-07-2002 05:30 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
A neat Idea for mounted units, possibly for Civ4 Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

I've been thinking about this ever since I sat down the other day and watched the movie Gladiator.

I was looking at the opening battle scene, and when I saw Maximus and his men riding down on horses, I said to myself, the Civ3 horsemen didn't really look like that?

So I came up with a neat idea.

Keeping with what we know about Civ3, remove all horse units, and replace them a single cheap horse. Horseman would be a regular horse, chivalry would be an armored horse, and military tradition would be a controlled breeded horse.

Then you need another non horse, non wheel unit and "load" it on the horse. So, for example, you build a regular horse, then a swordsman and mount the swordsman on the horse, now the unit has the same attack/defense number as a swordsman, but the horse adds 1 movement point, so the swordsman can move two spaces instead of one. Armored horse would add 2, and breeded horse would add 3.

Horses that have no unit on it can be captured. Once a unit is on a horse, the unit can’t unload nor upgrade. Horses can never upgrade.

I'm guessing this would be pretty unbalanced, but I want to know what everyone (those who catch my idea) thinks.

trevor is offline trevor
Warlord
Silver Spring, MD (Washington D.C.)
May 2002
time: 00:21
  Old Post 24-07-2002 07:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

Nice idea, but the lack of upgrades isn't a great selling point. Also sounds a bit to much like armies to me.

Dom Pedro II is offline Dom Pedro II
King
The College of New Jersey
Nov 1999
time: 05:21
  Old Post 24-07-2002 07:56
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Hmmm... well, really if you think about it, this applies to any unit in the game. The only think that separates anything from a Warrior to a Marine is the equipment they carry. So really, shouldn't the people stay the same and only the equipment be upgraded? Just a thought.

Lord Merciless is offline Lord Merciless
Warlord
USA
Jul 2002
time: 22:21
  Old Post 24-07-2002 08:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

Ever heard of Unit Design Workshop from Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri? That's basically the same idea.

Dom Pedro II is offline Dom Pedro II
King
The College of New Jersey
Nov 1999
time: 05:21
  Old Post 24-07-2002 08:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Well, when you consider the innovations that civilizations have created to fight wars since ancient times that were entirely unique to them (and I don't just mean unique units) it does give some credance to a Unit Workshop. Often times, its when a general says "hey, let's try it this way." that a turning point is formed.

steven8r is offline steven8r
Prince
of Central Texas
May 2002
time: 23:21
  Old Post 24-07-2002 23:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Thrawn,

I like your idea of having 'blank' horses that you can 'load' regular units onto to give them more movement. They should probably also get a little better attack also--from the added movement.

I don't like the idea of not being able to upgrade the units. Other than the no upgrade aspect, your idea rocks.

Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 25-07-2002 04:12 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

I did not allow horses and units be upgraded, only to get the game balanced, since I felt that people running around with Warriors on a horse suddenly becoming an Immortal on a horse would really unbalance the game. But if people would like to upgrade then sure, I just tried to give some negative effects just to keep the game balanced in my mind's eye.

quote:
Ever heard of Unit Design Workshop from Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri? That's basically the same idea.


Heard of Alpha Centauri, never played it, so that comment is void.

steven8r is offline steven8r
Prince
of Central Texas
May 2002
time: 23:21
  Old Post 25-07-2002 04:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

About upgrading.

I see your point--now. I was not thinking of upgrading, say, a mounted warrior to a mounted swordsman, rather upgrading a mounted warrior to Knight or the next higher mounted unit.

I agree that being able to upgrade a warrior to a swordsman whilst mounted would be a bit unfair if not impractical.

BTW: I'm using 'mounted warrior' in the sense that Trawn came up w/-- a warrior unit upon a horse, not to be confused w/ the Iroquios UU.

johncmcleod is offline johncmcleod
Prince
Coeur d'Alene, ID, USA
Jan 2002
time: 21:21
  Old Post 25-07-2002 06:01 Visit johncmcleod's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Cool idea, but one problem. Wouldn't it be kind of stupid to have marines or infantry on a horse when by that time mounted units were obsolete?

Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 26-07-2002 04:24 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote:
Originally posted by johncmcleod
Cool idea, but one problem. Wouldn't it be kind of stupid to have marines or infantry on a horse when by that time mounted units were obsolete?


That is why I made this thread, to get the kinks out. Although I agree marines shouldn't be on a horse, but infantry perhaps. Thanks for the enlightment.

Bambul is offline Bambul
Warlord
Sydney, Australia
Aug 2001
time: 15:21
  Old Post 26-07-2002 08:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

By the time you get to marines Infantry you could put them on APC'sin stead of horses, I would imagine.

This reminds me a bit of the colonisation unit system. You give a unit 50 muskets and they become a soldier. Give them 50 horses and they become scouts. Give them both and they become dragoons. There was really only one unit type, but with muskets and horses, as well as the ability to upgrade them (from regular to veteran to continental) you ended up with 7 different units.

It could potentially go well with a remodeled economic system, the colonisation economic model was very deep as trading was the backbone of the game.

But I do like the idea.

cyclotron7 is offline cyclotron7
King
Drowning in Schnitzel
Jan 2001
time: 21:21
  Old Post 26-07-2002 09:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

Perhaps to help alleviate the upgrade problem, newly upgraded units would always have to re-start at regular. Plus, putting them on horseback would count as an upgrade... representing new training, etc.

Ijuin is offline Ijuin
Warlord
Tokyo, Japan
May 2002
time: 14:21
  Old Post 26-07-2002 15:10
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

A Civ unit workshop would be cool, I think. Here are some ideas for parts:

Chassis:

1) Garrison Unit (move zero--cannot leave the city where it is produced except via Airlift or Naval Transport, but gets 25% bonus to defense power--available with Masonry to represent fortifications)

2) Foot unit (move 1--always available)

3) Mounted unit (move 2--requires Horseback Riding)

4) Mechanized unit (move 3, blitz--requires Motorized Transport)

5) Coptor unit (move 4, ignore terrain costs, but gains no benefit from roads/railroads, blitz--requires Advanced Flight)

Armor:

1) No Armor (defense 1--available always)

2) Leather Armor (defense 2--requires Warrior Code)

3) Mail Armor (defense 3--requires Iron Working + Iron)

3B) Bronze Plate Armor (defense 4, requires no iron, but costs twice as much as Suit Armor)

4) Suit Armor (defense 4--requires Chivalry + Iron)

5) Iron Plate Armor (defense 6--requires Metallurgy + Iron, cannot be used on Mounted units)

6) Steel Plate Armor (defense 8--requires Steel--cannot be used on Mounted units)

7) Kevlar Armor (defense 12-requires Synthetic Fibers)

Weapons:

1) Stone Spear (attack 1--available always)

2) Bronze Spear (attack 2--available with Bronze Working)

3) Iron Spear (attack 3--available with Iron Working)

4) Iron Sword (attack 4--available with Feudalism)

5) Smoothbore gun [aka musket/cannon] (attack 6--available with Military Tradition)

6) Rifled gun (attack 8--available with Replacable Parts)

7) Machinegun (attack 10--available with Mass Production)

8) Rocket Launcher (attack 14--available with Rocketry)

9) Laser (attack 18--available with The Laser)

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.
Apolyton Time is 00:21.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0448 seconds (89.04% PHP - 10.96% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net