 |
|  |
 |
|
Kuciwalker
|
 |
of Schmooism
Feb 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
Please, people, please, I am, and I believe most others are, sick and tired of all of these constitutional questions. Can't we just go by common sense? All of these problems only exist if you think about them. For example, instead of debating whether or not the Constitution could be changed instead of just added on to, the people who thought it was confusing could have just written their own version of the Constitution, which would be unofficial, on the forum with only the active parts included, and asked the mods to top it. Problems about succession during impeachment need never arrive - the situations will likely never happen, and if they do we can decide then, when we know the particulars of the situation. We shouldn't be thinking too much about the structure of the game - we should be HAVING FUN.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Well, part of the fun of the Democracy Game is in the roleplaying that it allows. And I think that, to some, having an elaborate and well-amended Code of Laws IS a fairly big part of that roleplaying. There's naturally going to be debate about it, but there's always debate when a democratic system is used for anything. It's another one of those things we can't prevent, like party alignment. These are things we just have to learn to live with.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
kring
|
 |
Wichita,KS,USA
Dec 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
I agree with too much. I have said this about polls before. And I believe it is one reason we have so few that actively particitpate. TMI = Too much information. The game, I was led to believe (and HOPE), was for FUN. I can't make most turnchats since I work a job during the turnchat hours, but I do post and vote. Yet, I still get turned off sometimes with all the TMI. That's why I don't read the election campaign or election poll threads. I vote for the person based on their posts in the rest of the DG. I also don't always read the poll threads, other than the issue post, since it can get out of hand easily.
I know we need certain things; I appreciate that; I also appreciate, well accept it, that early on, we will have lots of this stuff going on.
I will second, third, whatever more frequent turnchats.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Captain
|
 |
by Divine Right
May 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
I don't see why those who are posting on these boards choose ONLY to post in the Judicial/Constitutional threads... there ARE other threads! You are more than welcome to bump them back onto page one!
These things wouldn't be dominating the first page if people weren't interested enough in posting to them, and therefore bumping them up. Interest begets interest. Popular items get more attention, and more attention makes things more popular. That is the nature of forums like these. (You could even say, the invisible hand).
Justa few days ago, we had a few threads about whether or not to explore, galleys, colonizing Uber Island vs consolidating our continent first, the machiavelli institute, diplomacy, the map, geopraphy, the next target after america, etc... and more!
The new geopolitical situation had at least five threads dominating the first page for a while - and all the Constitutional stuff was bumped down. It happens in cycles. Relax.
If it bugs you that much, go start another thread. Or bump an old one.
As for me, whatever you (collectively) put on the front page, I'll read and post to if I find it interesting. Otherwise, I'll make a new thread - which reminds me... if I've got enough time tonight...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sheik
|
|
I am having fun. I think the constitutional questions are interesting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by skywalker
Please, people, please, I am, and I believe most others are, sick and tired of all of these constitutional questions. Can't we just go by common sense? All of these problems only exist if you think about them. For example, instead of debating whether or not the Constitution could be changed instead of just added on to, the people who thought it was confusing could have just written their own version of the Constitution, which would be unofficial, on the forum with only the active parts included, and asked the mods to top it. Problems about succession during impeachment need never arrive - the situations will likely never happen, and if they do we can decide then, when we know the particulars of the situation. We shouldn't be thinking too much about the structure of the game - we should be HAVING FUN. |
Oh HELL yeah! 
We have enough of a Constitution to play the game. We have a judiciary to deal with problems if and when they arise. We are confirming their choice as those we can trust to do what is needed. What-ifs are now useless.
And if this doesn't stop ppl making those threads - make sure you don't post there as further protest.
Maybe we should make a No Unnecessary BS Party?
OK. Maybe that's too far. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Papa Chubby
|
|
Iceland
Jun 2002 time: 05:21
|
|
Personally I believe that these constitutional issues are not the funniest things that we can do, but unfortunately they are neccesary. Everybody wanted the election process to be sharpened after the unbelievable turnout in the presidential election.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
disorganizer
|
|
Bavaria (Fanatika)
Jun 2002 time: 05:21
|
|
Maybe you could add a subforum for constitutional debatte. this would satisfy the constitution mongers and the gameplay-mongers. if the constitutional debatte subforum (call it debatte-club or something) comes to a proposal, they can post 1(!) for the topic in the normal forum ;-)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
disorganizer
|
|
Bavaria (Fanatika)
Jun 2002 time: 05:21
|
|
message of phoenatica:
thats why we implemented subforums. we could seperate the "important" stuff for gameplay and the roleplay-stuff from each other. the government forum only hold important information, with crosslinks to important citizen discussions. the poll subforum contains all polls and the citizen subforum hold the "rest".
i could imagine even better ways of "splitting the traffic", but we didnt get more than 3 subforums.
anyway you choose to go: you may spoil some ppl of. with the subforums, you maybe hold more ppl in the game that with forcing to stop discussion on some topics.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sheik
|
|
disorganizer is right. We need subforums!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BigRed515
|
|
If we could just get the results from the long anticipated war with the Americans, I think everyone would start talking more about the actual game. The last couple of threads about future plans (I think Plan Demain is one of those threads) have died down with the line "...but let's wait to see how the attack on America turns out." All this constitutional stuff is the forum equivilent of twiddling our thumbs, IMHO.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|