 |
|  |
 |
|
Catt
|
 |
California - SF Bay Area
May 2002 time: 21:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David Murray
But I still think that a lot of the game comes down to luck. Other than starting position, things such as resources, outcomes of barbarian villages, combat results (esp. when fighting units with similar stats), proximity of other civs, etc can't be determined by skill. |
But they can all be heavily influenced by skill, and for the very best players (of which I am not included), getting stuck with the worst variables of all these factors can all be overcome through skill and tactics.
The ability to most efficiently use the available terrain is of huge importance to your eventual success - knowing how to employ your worker and your citizens is a somewhat mundane (to some) learning process, but essential.
Your skill at effective expansion (peacefully and militarily)and controlling a variety of terrain types is one of the most important skills in regards to resource acquisition; your diplomatic skills and ability to trade for them are another.
Barbarians and combat require foresight, and require you to use your foresight wisely. As the boy scouts say - be prepared (and oftentimes be prepared for the worst.)
How you deal with an aggressive neighbor who starts very close to you is a measure of your player skills as well - diplomacy, trade, and military prowess all play a role.
quote: But I don't feel that any amount of strategy will make up for some of the parts of Civ3 which are ostensibly unduly influenced by luck and randomness. |
You say you've spent time in the strategy forum - just in case you missed the thread, check out how an amazingly skilled player overcomes an extraordinarily daunting start on Diety, and ulitmately plays the game out to a win. Click HERE.
Catt 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
vondrack

|
 |
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David Murray
...combat results (esp. when fighting units with similar stats) ... can't be determined by skill
In Civ3, combat results often seem utterly random. |
David,
the combat results (especially between units with similar stats) are MEANT to have utterly random results. The trick is to avoid engaging in such fights as much as possible. What you always need is attack with a high-attack unit and defend with a high-defense unit, so as you twist the odds in your favour (the probability count works in Civ3 on the game-wide scale, I assure you).
I am sometimes having my brains venting steam off trying to figure out how to combine my precious units in such a way that they are having their victory chances as high as possible, considering the surrounding terrain, rivers, fortifications etc. But I find out that this is exactly where I am superior to the computer AI. The AI is not that good in this micromanagement, often using incorrect units... not covering victorious, but wounded ones with fresh high-defense reserves etc.
You are right that the starting location is very important. However, it is mostly geography that makes Civ3 so replayable - you have to respond to whatever you get (and as Aeson proves, just about anything can be won).
It is also true that you can't determine the proximity of other civs with skill... however, your skills will help you to properly handle all the possibilities. Are they far away? Expand, pump out settlers as mad. Are they close by? Try securing iron or horses as soon as possible and hit them the sooner the better. This is what skills are about. It's about learning how to respond to various (even unfair or disadvantageous) situations in the game.
Cheers & Good luck,
Radek
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|