 |
|  |
 |
|
UnOrthOdOx
|
 |
Hello....
Jun 2002 time: 22:21
|
|
The way I understand our plans is that we are to take Washington, NY, then sue for peace, gaining tech, cash, and a city.
Now, there may be someone who knows the code the AI uses when bargaining, and can say the AI would never go for it, but would it not be more beneficial to destroy Philly as the second target and then gain NY in negotiations for peace? I understand we will rebuild on or near there anyway if we destroy NY, why not save that settler for something else, perhaps securing that Iron to the west? (yes, yes, it is in the middle of the Jungle, but it IS Iron and a possible future site of Ironworks)
A byproduct of such a move would be that it would move our army MUCH closer to France in the process. Thereby speeding our conquest of thier lands and Iron.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Robber Baron
|
 |
Commonwealth of Commonsense
Jun 2002 time: 00:21
|
|
GodKing, as I understand the plan, we bypass NY and hit Washington first.
If the AI is willing to give us NY after losing Washington, great. But in my experience, it usually holds onto cities near luxuries.
And by the way, Philadelphia is not an impressive city now, but with some terraforming, could be a sweet spot.
Or better yet, re-plant it one square NW. Then you're bordered by a river on two sides (good for defense if we move against westward enemies next), plus you've got river squares, forest tiles and grass/with shields to work.
Most importantly, Philly links up our core penninsula with our American acquisitions.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|