 |
|  |
 |
|
Artifex
|
|
Kentucky USA
Apr 2002 time: 05:21
|
|
If you have a situation where a city will be alot better once it expands and cover better resources vs. placing city for immediate maximizing of resources but later not as valuable.
I understand if you are religious then it's a non issue since you can pop rush a temple fairly quickly. But if your non religious then this is a painful decision that has to be made.
what are your opinions on this? Always place cities where it maximizes most valauble resources immediatly? Or tough it out and let the city stink for a long time for the future? How much does this hurt? Lets say you had 4 game forest squares for example..woudl you place a city there no matter what since it will be real powerful from the get go at 2 shields and 2 food?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|