 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
This thread will become ugly before long.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Victor Galis
Anyway as someone once said, "The limits of my language are the limits of my world." or something like that (the quote is translated). |
Not so... If world is emotions.
A farmer who can't express and elaborate in words his joy from say his daughter getting married, does not mean he has no such feelings of joy.
As a side note again he can express his joy in other ways. Dance, singing etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:21
|
|
Caligastia, do you think there should be racial measures done in order to further affect language development?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ecthelion
Caligastia, do you think there should be racial measures done in order to further affect language development? |
What are you talking about?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
Does anybody remember the "Newspeak" of 1984?
That was a similar idea- language should be simplified, blah, blah. Basically limiting the human ability to express ideas.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dan Severn
Does anybody remember the "Newspeak" of 1984?
That was a similar idea- language should be simplified, blah, blah. Basically limiting the human ability to express ideas. |
Yep. And true it was too IMO.
If you don't have the linguistic tools to commute, for example, the theory of free markets or socialism or christianity, then with time these very systems of thought and acting will become obsolete.
Yet, in utter theory, they could still be learned from one generation to the other through common practise etc.
However, I think that its not plausible that by eliminating certain words (aka certain forms of expression) you will automatically eliminate certain forms of action.
For example you may not know or express what "revolution" means. Yet if for some reason you found yourself in a position where you WOULD rebel, you would do just that.
Certain human emotions cannot be erased by simply erasing their expressional forms. Trails of thought can though, I think.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
Yes, the emotions probably could not be blotted out. But if one is unable to share ideas, they would be incapable of actually revolting. They would, as in the book, know something was terribly wrong, but have no clear idea what or how to remedy it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
You won't like the ending. But it is the best ending.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mercator
|
 |
Sorekara no Nanimo
Jan 1970 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: There is no reason why these meanings cannot be recorded on a computer. |
If that were true, none of us would have to worry about typos, and your favorite word processor would be able to correct any typographical, grammatical, contextual, semantical or whatever error correctly.
In contrast with what you may have learned in school, a language is not simply a dictionary + grammar. In fact, a grammar is a very unnatural approach to language, since it is prescriptional instead of descriptional. You may get the general idea of how a language is constructed, perhaps most useful in today's society for written language, even though there are languages in which written language may vary significantly from spoken language.
quote: It's a shame that a language as inefficient and unattractive as English is becoming the dominant language. You'd think that the simplest languages would be the most successful... |
quote: -They can not be recorded in another language. |
That's not quite true either. All languages are equally expressive. But languages are founded on culture, society and environment, so not all languages are equally good in expressing things related to those. You'd probably be best of with an Inuit language if you're talking about snow storms, but that doesn't mean a Tuareg can't do the same.
The reason languages should be kept alive is because of the sheer diversity. Language is such a fascinating concept. There are languages with sounds no-one around here would be able to pronounce, there is such a variety of linguistic constructs that would be lost with these languages. There is so much to be learned about language is general, how our brains process it, how much of it is already available in our brains when we are born and how much we acquire when growing up, what the limitations of our linguistic apparatus are... Not only that, but languages are an inherent part of a culture, and with the language, a part of the culture, if not all of it, will be lost.
But then again, maybe you'd want the entire world to speak English and do as you do, maybe you don't see any positive sides of a multicultural society.
And it won't ever be possible to have a single world language, unless everyone constantly stays in contact with everyone. Even now there are quite a few differences between, say, Australian and American English, or AAVE (African American Vernacular English), which can sometimes be enough to be partially or entirely incomprehensible. If everyone were to speak English, it would eventually diversify again and result in a whole plethora of languages all derived from English, with probably enough influences from the "old" local language.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|