 |
|
Dida
|
|
I think every civ should have 2 UUs. And instead of letting every UU be upscale version of some standard unit, why not make some UUs out of the blue, w/o any closely related standard unit. That will make the game more interesting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darkworld Ark
|
|
of the Capitalists
May 2002 time: 05:21
|
|
The problem is, what do you do for the Civs that don't have any historical unit that could be used for a second UU, like Babylon, Persia, Aztecs, & Zulus?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darkworld Ark
|
|
of the Capitalists
May 2002 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by monkspider
Good point Darkworld, I think adding unique improvements for each civ would be very interesting though. |
That'd be cool, you could give Babylon "The Tower of Babel" which would add to happeness, but would also give the small possibility that all the people in the city will become different nationalities.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Coracle
|
|
I many months ago added another UU for certain civs, especially those with nearly useless UU's such as the Americans and English.
English now have Longbowmen; everyone else gets crossbowmen. They also have MOW.
Americans have a fast musketman called Minuteman (starts GA); also we have F-15's.
Babylonians also now have a horse archer UU.
Unique Wonders are a fine idea. It also makes it less likely to lose a ton of production on a GW someone else just finished.
Mod it in yourself as Firaxis will never bother.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JtheJackal
|
|
1 UU works perfectly
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DrFell
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pythagoras
How about 1 UU per age? |
Would be really nice, but there would be far too many civs with no modern/ancient UUs (what would be the ancient American UU, for example).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Andrew_Jay
How about some new units that are shared by several civs? Much like the Eagle Warriors in AoE that could be used by Aztecs and Incas.
There would be three or four civs capable of a certain unit, another group of civs would get something else. Maybe they could be divided by region (Europe, America, Middle East, Asia, Greco-Roman). |
hi ,
indeed intresting , .....
they should trow at least 5-6 extra units in , then at least a second UU for each civ , and some UU for the groups , that means , .......
36 extra new units
can we expect that , .....
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Andrew_Jay
Problem is, the stuff I invision would mess up the current unit selection.
For example, only Europeans would have knights, Asians would have early gunpowder, Greco-Roman could have Hoplite like spearmen, Europeans could have different infantry than everyone else, Russia and America could have different sets of late game units. Special Middle Eastern Cavalry etc. etc. etc.
36 new units? I'm pretty sure that would exhaust almost every rational A/D/M combination |
hi ,
, not all the way , it can be done
right now you can take a unit , a UU for example and give it to a couple civ's , it works
however what would come closer to what you have in mind , would be to create maybe several tech treas , one for each culture group or so , ....
or to create more techs that can only be there for a group of civ's , ....
maybe even go with different era for certain culture groups , ....
---- ----
36 , well , there is going to be 8 new UU , and some they trow in extra , that is all ready 12-15 new units , ....
imagine a total of 31 civ's , then 36 is a small number
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|