 |
|  |
 |
|
Kuciwalker
|
 |
of Schmooism
Feb 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
(I'd like to note one thing: there is no penalty for disobeying polls because the only possible penalty is impeachment anyway. Also, look at the asterisks.)
Constitution
Article I: Executive
Section 1: President and Vice President
(insert current description of President and Vice President)
Section 2: Ministers
The War Minister is responsible for all units except Workers.
The Domestic Minister is responsible for all Workers, the tax/sci/lux slider, which technology is researched, and city production.
The Foreign Minister is responsible for all trades, alliances, and treaties.
Section 3: Assistants
Generals (or Admirals) are appointed by the War Minister to a specific theatre and confirmed by the (pick one: Citizens/Legislature). They are responsible for and make the final decisions on all units except Workers and Settlers in the theatre that they are assigned to. The President may, however, make minor changes in unit movement do to unexpected circumstances.
Governors are appointed* by the Domestic Minister to a specific Province (call it what you want) and confirmed by the (pick one: Citizens/Legislature). They are responsible for and make the final decisions on all Workers and city production in their Province. The President may NOT make minor changes to these things because the sort of unexpected circumstance that would force a change would be grounds to halt the (pick one: turnchat/turnthread).
Ambassadors are appointed by the Foreign Minister and are not confirmed because all they do is give him information.
Article II: Judicial
(insert current description of the Court)
Article III: Legislative**
Section 1: Membership
All members of the Legislature must be Citizens. To become a membe of the Legislature, you must (pick one: have a certain number of posts per week allowing for vacations etc./post in a thread created for this purpose that you will be active for the following month). Each month new members of the Legislature are confirmed through a mass affirmation vote, which is a multiple-choice poll in which each potential member must have more than 50% of the voters vote for him (excuse my wordiness). Each month, a member of the Legislature may propose the removal of ONE other member. If this proposal is seconded, a vote is held in which (pick one: one half/two thirds) of the voters vote for the removal. EDIT: No member of the Legislature may hold an office in the Executive or Judicial Branch. To do so, they must resign from the Legislature.
Section 2: Code of Laws
The Code of Laws is a document, beneath the Constitution, which contains all laws deemed not of the sort to be put in the Constitution. To add or modify a part of the Code of Laws, a member of the Legislature (remind me to think up a good, original name for them) must propose the addition or modification and it must be seconded by another member. Then, it may be passed by a majority vote. Laws may be deemed unconstitutional by the Court.
Article IV: Elections
(insert current description of elections, except for the change in ministers)
*Considering that Governors are so powerful, we may just have them elected.
**This section is not an integral part of this proposed Constitution, so it may end up just cut out.
I have the feeling I forgot something. Please tell me what.
Last edited by Kuciwalker on 08-08-2002 at 02:29
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darkness' Edge
|
|
I'm against a good portion of this.
Firstly, there's not enough ministers. There's too much power in the hands of too few.
Secondly, especially with so few ministers, the governors must not be appointed. This -is- a democracy game, right? This also applies to Generals, and to a lesser extent, Ambassadors.
Thirdly, I oppose a legislature that leaves out the citizens. The citizens are quite capable of making decisions without a middleman.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
UnOrthOdOx
|
 |
Hello....
Jun 2002 time: 22:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
For a long time, people said we need a "clerk" or something, who has no power at all on the forum, but who has to do all forum chores.
Some people argued it was the work of the VP. However, VPs can consider themselves as replacement for ministers, nothing more.
I think writing the constitution, updating the list of our government, writing the Code of Laws (seaprate from the const.) etc. should be given to someone who has time to do this, and wants too. It's not a too big job if you focus on it. It's a much bigger job if you must do it long plenty other things (like the Prez does)
Having a clerk would make my simple suggestion for a "CoL" viable. |
Clerk...well, I suppose I could assist there a bit. I already make a ton of links and make up stories, why not organize government while I'm bumping around their threads. The links are all kept in 'my notepad' so I would just have to cut/paste them into a directory thread.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Donal Graeme
|
 |
California
Jul 2002 time: 21:21
|
|
I had conisidered making some of these changes, or bringing it up at least, so I will respond to skywalker's ideas. I like the idea of provincial governors, who are responsible for a certain region, with all of the units(all of them) there under their control during peacetime. However, during wartime the SMC would gain control of the military, and could have the prez appoint generals or admirals if necessary.
However, I find that there is at present no need for a legislature, as the population of the Civ 3 Demo game is not large enough at this point to warrant one. I happen to like our mix of Cabinent/presidential system of executive power, with the legislative power in the hands of the people. I did like however, the way that Skywalker thought the COL should work. That is, with a set down constitution requiring 2/3 vote to change and regular laws requiring a simple majority. I will be posting a pre-poll discussion on this, so check it out.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
carpathia
|
|
If its not broke, don't fix it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mtgillespie
|
|
Manchester, England
Oct 2001 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by skywalker
The Legislature would be largely made up of the Citizens. The people who sign up and then never post or vote don't really count, in my mind. This just recognizes those who are active participants but not, under the current system, members of the government. |
This is nonsense. You sign up as a citizen. You then have the right to post as little or as often as you choose. You can vote as little or as often as you choose. You can check the forum as little or as often. None of these things should in any way affect your rights as a citizen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mtgillespie
|
|
Manchester, England
Oct 2001 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by skywalker
Look, it works for Phoenetica. And the system is broken. This gets rid of the deadwood. |
It's a nonsense. What possible effect will this have except to disenfranchise occasional voters/posters? You seem to be saying that if you're not posting a lot, and voting in every poll, your opinion is less valid. That's clearly nonsense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
jdjdjd
|
 |
of España
May 2002 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by mtgillespie
It's a nonsense. What possible effect will this have except to disenfranchise occasional voters/posters? You seem to be saying that if you're not posting a lot, and voting in every poll, your opinion is less valid. That's clearly nonsense. |
Actually, we could use the number that vote in the Pres election as a census number, that way you don't have to post or vote in anything else, just vote in the pres election to count. And instead of using it for keeping people out or in, we could use it to create a quorum number to use in deciding when a vote of something is valid.
For example: We set a quorum at 75% of the number of voters.
50 people vote for president. If we want to have a change to constit or impeach someone, then you need more than 37.5 (38 in this case) to pass change. What else this quorum could be used for, I'm not sure.
As for the Legislature, as skywalker mentioned it can be replaced by just citizens, so we could leave out the whole section on Legislature.
The revisions would possibly be shorter than current, but once you tack on the code of laws, then its going to get pretty long itself. I would again suggest changing those sections of current CoL and leave the rest intact by amendment instead of throwing the whole thing out and starting over. Again, look how long it took to get Impeachment up to a vote, and its not too short....
(oh and only 18 people have voted after 1 full day, so don't foget to vote...if you don't like it then vote no, but just please vote).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|