 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
That's one theory but the latest thinking is they were a separate branch - same genus, common ancestor, different species. |
Still human though. Genus Homo. Just not Sapiens. Not as clever apparently despite having the same size brain to mass ratio. Larger in absolute terms. Slightly.
quote:
Its been proven Neantherdals were around and co-existing with early humans up until pre modern times. Then they died out. Its a really interesting to think we once shared this planet with another humanoid species. |
They shared the Earth for a long time. A shorter time in the same area though. They were the first human species to have a brain larger than 1200 cc and were around much longer than we Sapiens have been. Early Sapiens mostly used the same tools as Neanderthal although it seems likely to me that Sapiens had tools that have not been preserved that were specialized for their different lifestyle. Later Sapiens had developed more sophisticated blade technologly that produced more tools per unit of stone.
As for souls, if there are such things, I see no reason that Neanderthals shouldn't have had them. Then again I had an arguement with a nun in Catholic school over my pet dog having a soul. I disagreed then and still do. I am even more certain that siamese cats must have souls if men do. They are too aware of themselves. Chimps more so yet as well as at least some dolphin species. Some species of bird are exceedingly bright as well. Amazingly so considering their brain size.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Hydey
neandertals and early humans coexisted and infact bred together and through evolution the characteristics of the neandertals disappeared. |
There is no evidence to support this. It may be true but so far not one adult hybrid has ever been found and only one POSSIBLE hybrid child that died young. There is a bit of mDNA evidence from one Neanderthal and it showed indications that Sapiens and Neanderthal may not have been closely related. However equally ancient mDNA has been found in an Australian aborigine fossil and that too has been found to have a significantly larger than expected difference from modern Sapiens. So at present there is only speculation and what evidence there is fails to support the speculation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
But, why couldn't they breed? Seems very close to me. Like horses/mules/etc...
|
They may simply have found each other unatractive. Maybe Neanderthal still went into heat for instance.
Heat loss is a major question. Why did it happen with humans and when did it happen? Before or after Sapiens? I think before but thats just a guess. However Sapiens have been in Australia for 60,000 years and are only 100,000 years old as a species. I am sure heat loss had to occur before Australia was colonized.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|