 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
I don't see a list, but how about Thermopylae? Key delaying battle enables Greeks to get their act together. Without it, European history could have been vastly different.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
I'll just name a few up to 500AD:
480BC - Salamis: Preservation of the Western Culture
332BC - Gaugamela: Destruction of the Persian Empire and foundation of the Hellenic Empire.
119BC - Fifth Han Offensive against Huns: Firm establishment of Han(Chinese) power in East Asia, Hun
westward migration begun, opening of the Silk Route.
9AD - Teutoburger Forest: Roman conquest of Germany failed.
378AD - Adrianople: Destruction sequence of the Western Roman Empire and onset of Middle Age begun.
451AD - Chalon: Preservation of the West from Hunnish onslaught, Hun migration stopped.
There were several other important battles such as Kadesh 1245BC, Granicus 334BC, Ipsus 301BC, Chang Ping 260BC, Cannae 216BC, Zama and Gai Xia 202BC, Cynocephalae 197BC, Corinth? 168BC, Carraeh 53BC, Alesia 52BC, Actium 31BC, Guan Du 200AD, Chi Bi 208AD, and Rome 410AD, but I would rather consider their effects to be either localized, only part of a long chain of events, or already a foregone conclusion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
Your missing Lepanto where Venice broke the Moslem hold on the Mediteranean.
Not the most important I suppose but one of them. Up there with Saratoga anyway as if the Brits had won the Americans would have retreated as they did so many times before and fought again another day so we can't be certain that the world would be very different with an American victory.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Andrew1999
|
|
Can you give a little background on some of these? Waterloo, Stalingrad, Midway are obvious but I don't recognize some of the older ones right off.
Edit: Badr, Talas River, and Ayn Jalut in particular.
Last edited by Andrew1999 on 09-08-2002 at 23:47
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
I disagree with Stalingrad being the most important battle in WW2. Speaking of decisiveness, Battle of Britain and Battle of Moskva were far more important. Had Germans taken Moskva in 1941, they had a real chance of winning the war and would never have to fight at Stalingrad.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Saratoga convinced the French and Spanish to back the fledgling states. Without that help the revolt would have been doomed. |
Yes to a large extent.
What I am saying is that if the Brits had won the Americans might have been able to get the help in a later battle. Maybe even against Bourgoyne by pecking at his troops as they continued on their way. An American success is what did the trick there but an American failure, if not too extreme, would not have obviated a later success that got the same results.
Such a success would however have had to come soon. A disastor for the Americans at Saratoga would have made that difficult if not impossible but if the Brits had pulled out a phyric victory success could still come another day at least if the day came soon.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|