 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
so you will not read that which disturbs your view of the world?
That is sad (I disagreed with Chlidhood's end, but thought it a good book and one which brought up some interesting points, ones which should be considered)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: so you will not read that which disturbs your view of the world? |
That is hardly the same as disiking Childhoods End a book. Science Fiction isn't going to effect many peoples world view anyway. That is more in the realm of books that deal with fact.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
That is the whole point of reading SciFi (And Fantasy). The point is to see new ideas and reflections of reality that don't lend to standard fiction. I can't imagine why you would read SciFi or Fantasy if not to see new ideas and concepts (which effect your world view).
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
I read it for entertainment. You need to work on your imagination. People have a lot of reasons for doing things.
Thats a fact that might change your world view.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ethelred
... Science Fiction isn't going to effect many peoples world view anyway. That is more in the realm of books that deal with fact. |
I heartily disagree. Your suggestion that only books that deal with fact are likely to effect people's world views in some way excludes all works of fiction, whether SciFi or not.
I don't think dealing with fact is even that big an issue - it seems far more important that the work deal with ideas.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
yes, I like him
I am a big fan of Perdido Station
I plan on purchasing Scar (once I get money)
and sure I will change my request to Speculative Fiction (which includes fantasy) rather than just SciFi
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Echinda
I don't think dealing with fact is even that big an issue - it seems far more important that the work deal with ideas. |
Since Childhood's End was the cause of this line I was primarily speaking about Science Fiction and for that matter Fantasy. Ideas based on fictional worlds are rarely, at best, a good reason for a paradigm shift. I know the some young impressionable minds have been tragicaly warped by Ayn Rand's fiction but that is not quite the case for Childhood's End which dealt with fictional science, fictional species and artificial human behaviour intended to support the story line.
I think far more people have changed their thinking by learning about evolutionary biology than have been changed by reading about things that don't exist. The key with Science Fiction is that its not dealing with the real world. It does deal with ideas but often the ideas are based on what would happen IF. Basing your ideas on the writing of Robert Heinlein for instance is to base your ideas on stuff he made up. Humans are much more sociable than Heinlein portrays us.
I just tend to think that ideas based on facts have much more substance than ideas dealing with fictional worlds. Especialy that vile ending of Childhood's End. Shove your book Arthur. The destruction of all life on Earth is not a good thing and I am not going to pretend it is for the sake of a story.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|