 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:21
|
|
Let it go dude..
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:21
|
|
Now there's a thought...
However I think I've got the idea. Some twit picks on Sneak's family and gets threatened with bodily harm. Yes?
Well, I've always had a problem with such threats. The problem is that the internet prevents folks from reaching out and touching someone hiding behind it and making comments about loved ones. I've met Sneak, gotten to know him, and I'll tell you this, the twit got off light w/ a few threats.
But you're right, I haven't read the thread, I just have confidence in SuperSneak and have replied to attacks against my family as well. I know the drill.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by blackice
What does anyone's child have to do with these forums Asher? |
When a man is going on and on about what a great man he is, it's fair game to look at his "accomplishments" and see how wonderful they actually are.
The comment was aimed at Sneak because he had the child with someone he wasn't even sure he'd be with in the near future, and that's highly irresponsible and not something a real man would do in my books. That's what the comment was about, he chose to believe it was a personal attack on his son for whatever reasons he has. The context was a slam against Sneak, and it was a slam against Sneak, I could have chosen far better words for it, but I was pissed off at the time. I was hoping that Sneak (in all of his wisdom with the various liberal arts degrees) could have figured out how to read in context and would see what was meant, but he couldn't do that.
quote: That is talking about his child Asher wakeup man…. |
It was talking about his child from the angle of being one of his accomplishments of being "a man".
If it was a personal attack against his child, I would have actually said something to insult the child rather than describe the condition between his parents when he was born. The kid has nothing to do with that, which is why it boggles my mind that he cries about it being a personal attack against his son. It's more like it hurts Sneak's ego when someone brings it to his attention.
quote: Red neither was right period...enough said |
Well, let's see here.
I said he had a son in an unstable relationship by using the term bastard child. Apparently this isn't very PC, so this warrants a personal threat against me to out me to my parents. He not only uttered this threat ONCE, but multiple times. It may not seem like it's a big deal to you, but believe me it is...
Yeah, that's fair. 1 week each, that makes sense, doesn't it? Give me a ****ing break.
quote: Why get banned Asher, just take that leave you were talking about. You obviously need it, it will do you good Asher. |
Because as long as I know there's scum like Sneak around who will talk negatively about me behind my back I'm going to want to respond to it. That's why I asked Ming to restrict my account for at least a month but he didn't seem to care for that request.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lancer
Now there's a thought...
However I think I've got the idea. Some twit picks on Sneak's family and gets threatened with bodily harm. Yes?
Well, I've always had a problem with such threats. The problem is that the internet prevents folks from reaching out and touching someone hiding behind it and making comments about loved ones. I've met Sneak, gotten to know him, and I'll tell you this, the twit got off light w/ a few threats.
But you're right, I haven't read the thread, I just have confidence in SuperSneak and have replied to attacks against my family as well. I know the drill. |
Lancer, you have no ****ing idea what you're talking about. Stay the hell out of it.
Sneak took a non-PC comment and began crying that someone was attacking his family, even though it should have been very obvious that was not the intent, and he then made a personal threat which has the very real possibility of majorly ****ing up someone's life. It's worse than the physical threat, because this threat is very real and very easy for him to pull off from a long distance.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:21
|
|
Asher, Prosper was born out of wedlock, but that's been fixed, Suzee and Sneak are married now. Yet you did not refrain from calling Prosper, a really great kid and son of a married couple, "a bastard".
Since the derogatory term is applied to children born out of wedlock and you decided to use it to Sneak, one of his parents, why should you consider it unfair if Sneak falls to your level, contacts your parents, and tells them you are gay? It's true isn't it? Just like Prosper being born out of wedlock is true? Or, if he were to fall to your level and choose a derogatory term, say you were a faggot?
He wouldn't do that I'm sure and I use it only as an example to compare with your use of the term bastard.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
woohoo
Ashers back
there were some threads for you to join in (even a Microsoft thread)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lancer
Asher, Prosper was born out of wedlock, but that's been fixed, Suzee and Sneak are married now. Yet you did not refrain from calling Prosper, a really great kid and son of a married couple, "a bastard". |
Apparently you have no idea what bastard means, do you Lancer?
quote: bas·tard Pronunciation Key (bstrd)
n.
A child born out of wedlock. |
Whether or not they got married after (and what a wedding that was!) is not the point.
And there is a difference in connotation between "a bastard" and "a bastard child", and it's no wonder that you and Sneak (and blackice and Chris) enjoy truncating the phrase so it looks like I just called his child a bastard, rather than a bastard child.
quote: Since the derogatory term is applied to children born out of wedlock and you decided to use it to Sneak, one of his parents, why should you consider it unfair if Sneak falls to your level, contacts your parents, and tells them you are gay? It's true isn't it? Just like Prosper being born out of wedlock is true? Or, if he were to fall to your level and choose a derogatory term, say you were a faggot? |
They're in completely different leagues.
It's certainly not a nice thing to say, and I would never call his son a bastard in his presence, but in a debate with the father about his manly accomplishment it's fair game if he has a kid in an unstable relationship at the time.
How you can compare this to contacting someone's parents and outting them is beyond me, and it tells me a little bit more of how feeble minded you really are.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
All I will say on this:
SS sent me a PM (won't post it, don't worry) apologizing to me about the incident. While I think it's a big thing to do, I feel that the threat to out Asher to his family (which he did NOT portray as a joke) was inexcusable, and there should be a zero-tolerance policy for such a threat. I would have had him perma-banned for it, and I think Asher had every right to be infuriated over it. Even if he called SS's kid a rotten little sh*t, that doesn't remotely compare to making a threat to do something to somebody in real life. Most message boards take this stuff VERY seriously, and I don't think Apolyton should be different.
I'm very pissed that someone whose presence I value will likely not return over this. But I don't blame him one bit.
Thank you. |
I diagree with you over this
it was a threat made in a verbal fight and whlie wrong there was nothing that needed permabanned in it (I think the two week ban was appropriate)
if you permabanned over that you would have to permaban over many other things also, because theings get sad in the heat of the moment that people later regret
and I would like Asher to stay on the board as well, so I agree there
I just think that punishment is a good enough action, permabanning is like the DP and shold only be used in cases of sufficeint seriousness (like if Supersneak had actually done the threat)
as for the brawl, let's put that behind us (it has gotten to serious to be funny and I think it is best to end it)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:21
|
|
Boris, The use of the word "bastard" came first?
Asher lives in a glass house and he's throwing stones? Sneak shouldn't throw back because he might break a window.
Ya right.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
while I do not remember the thread in question
and think that it is wrong to continue this discussion (will just cause more hurt feelings)
I think the point was to give the guys some time to cool off
I like both of them, so could everyone leave this subject alone (just don't talk about it)
some feelings were hurt, mistakes were made
it would be best for all if this conversation ended
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Threats to do such things are not jokes, Jon Miller. People have been murdered via internet strangers, so a no-tolerance policy is appropriate. Calling people names is DRAMATICALLY different than threatening to really do something to them. Since Apolyton moderators are not qualified to psychologically evaluate posters who make such threats, IMO they need to take every such threat seriously and deal with it under the assumption it is real. |
but in a huge argument people make threats all the time
you can't go permabanning every person who does so (that would be like giving the DP to those who get in fights)
it is only those who act wrongly that shuold be permabanned (those who engage in the most foul crimes get the DP)
while words should be taken seriously, it must be understood that they are jsut words, and people say things when they are angry (including threats)
the proper response is some moderator action, and if supersneak had a habit of making threats against posters I am sure the punishment would be graeter
but he hasn't (this is the first time I am aware of), and there is nothing about him that we know that would suggest that he would act on the threat either
I like it that the apolyton system assumes innocent until proven guilty, and is loath to give people the final cut (I of course think that people should be given a bit more leeway, poor CivNation)
I do not consider threats a joke (Although when I insult people here it is almost always as a joke), but Supersneak has done the time and that is all that is required (and should be given) in the situation
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|