Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Civ3-General-Archive > Kamikaze!
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Should air units be able to Kamikaze? (Time out:0 days after 19-08-2002, 13:31)
Yes! KAMIKAZEEEEEEEEE... BOOM!
No! Keep those planes in the sky!
Yeah... but I won't go over board with it.
It would make no difference what so ever.
View Results [Edit Poll (moderators only)]
Author
Thread   
Pages (2): [ 1   2   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Kalius is offline Kalius
Emperor
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002
time: 16:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 13:29
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Kamikaze! Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Hey all. I just thought I would post a poll here, saying whether a new Civ game should have an action for air planes, where you can "Kamikaze" into an enemy unit/city. This would be good if your plane couldn't make it back to an airbase before they're feul ran out.

J Bytheway is offline J Bytheway
Emperor
England
Jul 2001
time: 05:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 15:44 Visit J Bytheway's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

I don't know whether it would be a good idea for all planes to be able to, but I once made a Civ2 scenario with Kamikaze bombers in, and the AI built hundreds of them! One city with two AEGIS cruisers and a SAM battery (that's x8 defense, IIRC) fended off about 40 bomber attacks in one turn (without losing any units, but both cruisers were half dead). I've never seen the AI do anything in such excess...

Solver is offline Solver
Apolyton Duke Of Something
Latvia, Riga
Sep 2000
time: 07:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 16:58 Visit Solver<br><img src=/forums/images/staff-icon.gif>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

Generally threads with such general ideas over civ games would be belonging here...

fittstim is offline fittstim
Warlord
Stockholm, Sweden
Jul 2001
time: 06:21
Arrow  Old Post 19-08-2002 17:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

Kamikaze doesn't make sense. Soldiers don't willingly kill themselves. It takes strategy out of the game.

But since this whole issue isn't relevant to CivIII where bombers never run out of fuel (unlike CivI and CivII), I'm wondering what the point is???

P.S. Sorry if that sounds nasty. I'm just wondering if you meant this in a civII or civIII context?

zulu9812 is offline zulu9812
King
of Scotland
Jan 2002
time: 05:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 17:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

You got Kamikaze pilots in WWII - that's where the term comes from: the Japanese suicide pilots.

redbull, just give planes the Cruise Missile ability and you have your kamikaze

NeoStar is offline NeoStar
Warlord
Sydney
Jul 2002
time: 15:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 17:54
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by fittstim
Kamikaze doesn't make sense. Soldiers don't willingly kill themselves. It takes strategy out of the game.


There must be limitation to the idea. I would see it being confined to one gov (fundamentalism - but its not there) OR mass suicides aggravating war weariness greatly.

fittstim is offline fittstim
Warlord
Stockholm, Sweden
Jul 2001
time: 06:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 18:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by zulu9812
You got Kamikaze pilots in WWII - that's where the term comes from: the Japanese suicide pilots.


Really!?!?! I didn't know that

The point isn't whether a few loyal/warped pilots volunteered/were welded into the cockpit of a plane that was then loaded with explosives. The point is that the Kamikaze is not a "unit" any more than a "suicide bomber" or the opium-hazed Assassins of the Crusades era would be. They are blips on the screen. A sorry few compared to the real units of the armed forces.

Imagine having a waring strategy that was based on killing your own soldiers. What person would support such a thing? The cities would immediately rise up and rebel - switch to a more decent society.

If you want to make the point, then you should make a kamikaze unit appear randomly and rarely - much like a leader. Then you could have your wacko-kamikaze units but wouldn't be able to have a war strategy based on amassing dozens of units.

The Pioneer is offline The Pioneer
Prince
Germany
May 2002
time: 06:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 18:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

I don't see how this concept can fit into Civ 3. For a later civ game I would much prefer that Firaxis would work on the Air and Naval concept a bit more so that we can enjoy them before we go to such units like a Kamikaze, although it's an interesting idea.

Maybe if somebody would do a WWII scenario in the Pacific theater, he could then implement it!

So long...

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 18:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
Originally posted by fittstim
Really!?!?! I didn't know that

The point isn't whether a few loyal/warped pilots volunteered/were welded into the cockpit of a plane that was then loaded with explosives. The point is that the Kamikaze is not a "unit" any more than a "suicide bomber" or the opium-hazed Assassins of the Crusades era would be. They are blips on the screen. A sorry few compared to the real units of the armed forces.

Imagine having a waring strategy that was based on killing your own soldiers. What person would support such a thing? The cities would immediately rise up and rebel - switch to a more decent society.

If you want to make the point, then you should make a kamikaze unit appear randomly and rarely - much like a leader. Then you could have your wacko-kamikaze units but wouldn't be able to have a war strategy based on amassing dozens of units.

fittstim,

the Japanese used kamikaze pilots en mass throughout the late WW2, when desperately trying to stop the US from reaching the Japanese homeland. It was not just a few of them, they were ending their lives in hundreds. Also, the Japanese cities did not appear to rise up and rebel because of that, if you mention it. Actually, becoming a kamikaze was highly esteemed in the Japanese society. It had to do much with the cultural background of the nation.

Saying "what person would..." etc. is much like saying "what person would support suicidal Palestinian bomb-attackers?". However unbelievable and unsupportable this seems to Western people, these things happen and are apparently quite ok with other nations, which have different cultural background.

Said that, I would still not support a kamikaze unit to be included, mostly because even though they were used in big numbers, they were not very effective and meant very little as far as the military importance was concerned.

BTW... although the principle of kamikaze was tied mostly to planes/pilots, it was used, to an extent, with ships, too... The Japanese battleship Yamato (one of the grandest battleships ever built) joined by several smaller vessels ended her life in a futile attempt to suicidally intercept the US fleet. Had fuel enough to make it to the place of encounter only, but not back. Sunk by American naval bombers before having a slightest chance to fire a single shot...

Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 19:09 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

It makes no difference. Airplanes and anything else that uses bombardment are still horrible. Not worth the time to build.

Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 19:12 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by fittstim
But since this whole issue isn't relevant to CivIII where bombers never run out of fuel (unlike CivI and CivII), I'm wondering what the point is???


Those were the days.

I'm leaning towards having Firaxis go back to that system if they won't increase the range beyond 8 in the editor.

HazieDaVampire is offline HazieDaVampire
King
The British Empire
Apr 2002
time: 05:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 22:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

The Nazi's had suicide soldiers, people who'd lost the whole of their family in the eastern front or through bombing raids could join a unit who would do missions that success would only come if the soldiers didn't care if they lived or died!

Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 22:21 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by HazieDaVampire
The Nazi's had suicide soldiers



How about replace the Samuri with the BONZI! unit.

Hagbart is offline Hagbart
Prince
Copenhagen, Europe
Feb 2002
time: 06:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 23:10
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

I voted no, i'm tired of WW2!

Hagbart is offline Hagbart
Prince
Copenhagen, Europe
Feb 2002
time: 06:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 23:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

BTW to Thrawn: No probs with huge maps? I have a p3-550 too and I have probs! Why?

Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 19-08-2002 23:14 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:
Originally posted by Hagbart
BTW to Thrawn: No probs with huge maps? I have a p3-550 too and I have probs! Why?


In order to keep this threat in topic, I will PM you shortly my answer.

HazieDaVampire is offline HazieDaVampire
King
The British Empire
Apr 2002
time: 05:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 02:09
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#17 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

PM me too, i have a 450 and i have to wait about 1 min!

Inverse Icarus is offline Inverse Icarus
Emperor
flying too low to the ground
May 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 04:54 Visit Inverse Icarus's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#18 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

i'd like to see a "kamakazie" button that doubles the range of a REGULAR fighter (any aircraft), not a special unit.

In civ2 you could kamakazie your fighters all you wanted to.

Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 05:53 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#19 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by UberKruX
i'd like to see a "kamakazie" button that doubles the range of a REGULAR fighter (any aircraft), not a special unit.

In civ2 you could kamakazie your fighters all you wanted to.



Or just double all the values. And degrees the interception chance by a 1/3.

Hazie: I'll work on... it's late right now and I just noticed it.

Coracle is offline Coracle
Prince

Feb 2002
time: 00:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 06:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#20 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Japanese kamikazes were a DESPERATION measure that came late in World War Two.

Unless Civ 3 breaks down into monthly turns it really is unrealistic to have them as they lasted in fact for a very short time.

Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 06:28 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#21 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
Unless Civ 3 breaks down into monthly turns it really is unrealistic to have them as they lasted in fact for a very short time.


I would like that. Have modern age take 12 turns to do a full year. So turn A would be 1941.12, B: 1942.01, C: 1942.02, ect.

Coracle is offline Coracle
Prince

Feb 2002
time: 00:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 06:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#22 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Thrawn05


Those were the days.

I'm leaning towards having Firaxis go back to that system if they won't increase the range beyond 8 in the editor.


Yes, those Civ 2 days. How we miss them.

Bombers in Civ 3 are a pain for many reasons besides being relatively ineffective and having much too short a range.

In Civ 2 bombers could INTERDICT tiles. In otherwords, you could leave your bomber on a tile and unles it could be shot down the enemy could not move onto it. This was very useful for invasions.

Try interdicting the area around a planned invasion site now with Civ 3! You would need WAVES of bombers trying to destroy the roads and RR's, if not shot down.

That, combined with the crazy unlimited MP's on RR's, makes invasions very difficult to succeed owing to the counterattack.

Thrawn05 is offline Thrawn05
King
All Your Posts Are Belong To Ming
Dec 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 06:50 Visit Thrawn05's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#23 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Coracle


Yes, those Civ 2 days. How we miss them.

Bombers in Civ 3 are a pain for many reasons besides being relatively ineffective and having much too short a range.

In Civ 2 bombers could INTERDICT tiles. In otherwords, you could leave your bomber on a tile and unles it could be shot down the enemy could not move onto it. This was very useful for invasions.

Try interdicting the area around a planned invasion site now with Civ 3! You would need WAVES of bombers trying to destroy the roads and RR's, if not shot down.

That, combined with the crazy unlimited MP's on RR's, makes invasions very difficult to succeed owing to the counterattack.


Pretty sweet, but I must admit, I never played Civ2 . I do play Civ1 for the SNES, and I like the air combat on that.

Jets move, destroy a target, and must return within the same turn to a city or carrier, or city to carrier or vise versa.

Bombers take up to 2 turns in the air. Which means they can move I think 16 tiles, and then the turn move another 16.

That system I liked.

It's good to be the KING!

MarkG is offline MarkG
Grand Lord of Apolyton, Owner of all this land as far as the eye can see

Donate to the Red Cross
Macedonia, Greece
Jan 1970
time: 07:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 12:18 Visit MarkG<br><img src=/forums/images/admin-icon.gif>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#24 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
Yes, those Civ 2 days. How we miss them.
why dont you go back to it then?

and yes, after the continuing lack of replies to my posts, i can post my favorite part of the song that was obviously written for coracle, even if he probably wasnt born at the time
quote:
Brave Sir Robin ran away,
Bravely ran away, away.
When danger reared its ugly head, he bravely turned his tail and fled.
Yes, brave Sir Robin turned about
And gallantly, he chickened out. Bravely taking to his feet,
He beat a very brave retreat,
Bravest of the brave, Sir Robin.


you'll find the first part in previous posts of mine

Last edited by MarkG on 20-08-2002 at 12:26

notyoueither is offline notyoueither
Deity
of naught
Aug 2001
time: 22:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 12:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#25 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

You should expect a PM on the morrow.

MarkG is offline MarkG
Grand Lord of Apolyton, Owner of all this land as far as the eye can see

Donate to the Red Cross
Macedonia, Greece
Jan 1970
time: 07:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 12:42 Visit MarkG<br><img src=/forums/images/admin-icon.gif>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#26 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

morrow?

notyoueither is offline notyoueither
Deity
of naught
Aug 2001
time: 22:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 12:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#27 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

On the morrow = Tomorrow.

Sorry, 'talking' with too many Brits lately, must have activated a recessive gene.

Nym is offline Nym
Prince
France
Mar 2002
time: 06:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 13:54
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#28 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

The idea is interesting, but it should have limitations:

  • the plane must have enough mouvement points to reach the city,
  • the success rate should only be a little better than bombardement if the plane hits the city without being intercepted/destroyed by SAM or fighter.

fittstim is offline fittstim
Warlord
Stockholm, Sweden
Jul 2001
time: 06:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 14:54
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#29 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by vondrack

fittstim,

the Japanese used kamikaze pilots en mass throughout the late WW2, when desperately trying to stop the US from reaching the Japanese homeland. It was not just a few of them, they were ending their lives in hundreds. Also, the Japanese cities did not appear to rise up and rebel because of that, if you mention it. Actually, becoming a kamikaze was highly esteemed in the Japanese society. It had to do much with the cultural background of the nation.


Were you drunk when you wrote that or are you really that confused about world history?

The Japanese did not use kamikaze plane "en masse". This is a military fact. Their claim to fame is the "TERROR" that they caused in the soldiers opposing them. Much like suicide bombers in Israel. They were, however, not as popular or common as their claim to fame would have one believe.

Saying that there were "hundreds" of them is a joke compared to the TENS OF MILLIONS of soldiers fighting in the war.

Becoming a kamikaze pilot was definitely NOT an esteemed act within the society. When the generals realized that many of the supposed "kamikaze" pilots weren't actually killing themselves but bailing out (usually too early so that the plane crashed into the ocean), they enacted a policy of welding the pilot within the canopy so that escape was not possible. The samurai/bushi mentality encouraged bravery and honor in battle. Not exactly what people think of when they hear about kamikaze (or suicide bombers).

The sad fact was that the Japanese pilots were getting shot down/killed at an unsustainable rate. The kamikaze idea was sheer desperation because they were out of skilled pilots.

Side note: There were several "kamikaze" pilots who actually survived? Strange but true fact...

notyoueither is offline notyoueither
Deity
of naught
Aug 2001
time: 22:21
  Old Post 20-08-2002 15:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#30 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

5 thousand men and aircraft are not an insignificant number. Especially the aircraft.

Sinking or damaging hundreds of allied (American) ships is not insignificant either.

How many kamikaze missions at Okinawa alone?

Are you drunk, or just mad that someone has an opinion different from yours?

 
Pages (2): [ 1   2   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.
Apolyton Time is 00:21.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0656 seconds (93.16% PHP - 6.84% MySQL) with 34 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net