Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Civ3-General-Archive > China and Persia...!?
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Are China's Scientific and Persia's Militaristic traits mixed up? (Time out:0 days after 21-08-2002, 14:58)
China should be Scientific and Persia Militaristic.
They are as they should be.
View Results [Edit Poll (moderators only)]
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
=DrJambo= is offline =DrJambo=
Warlord
Athens of the North
Jan 2002
time: 05:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 14:56
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
China and Persia...!? Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Anyone get the feeling that they mixed up the starting traits of these two civs?

Take China for example... aggressive setting of 2 yet militaristic, has science as build often in their categories list and yet aren't scientific?

Then Persia, aggressive level of 4 and no build often for science, although they are scientific and not militaristic?!

Go figure?!

=DrJambo= is offline =DrJambo=
Warlord
Athens of the North
Jan 2002
time: 05:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 15:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Title of poll should be "Are China's militaristic and Persia's Scientific..."

Doh!

Comrade Tassadar is offline Comrade Tassadar
Settler

Aug 2005
time: 05:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 15:08 Visit Comrade Tassadar's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Also, forgive me if I'm not too knowledgable on these things, but wasn't China the leading country in technological advance for quite a few years?

Galvatron is offline Galvatron
Prince
of the Decepticons
Aug 2002
time: 23:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 15:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Yeahh you got the point your theory is proofed by history:

The Chines were in the middle-ages the most technologically advanced nation but military very weak where Persia was a more or less militaristic state in the antic but scientifically behind the standard of that epoch.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 15:13
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Missing the banana option...

Seriously, I have read somewhere that the Chinese traits were changed very shortly before the release, so they got mangled, the internal settings not correctly reflecting their advertised traits... what you say makes sense, but perhaps the aggressiveness and building preferences should be adjusted accordingly instead of the traits?

Firebird is offline Firebird
Warlord

May 2002
time: 06:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 15:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

I agree: History says China should be scientific and Persia militarisitc. I don't think China was ever the great conquerors, where as Persia had a period of military expansion. If they had not been stopped by the greeks history might have looked very differently.

GeneralTacticus is offline GeneralTacticus
Emperor
of Melbourne, Australia
Dec 2001
time: 15:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 15:38
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Didn't they change the Chinese traits so they'd get a GA from the Great Wall?

panag is offline panag
Emperor
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000
time: 07:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 15:59 Visit panag's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

hi ,

in order for it to be truly correct there should be the ability that it changes over time , ....

it should also be dependent more on the type of government

have a nice day

Arrian is offline Arrian
Emperor
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 20:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

I'd agree that China should be scientific, especially once PtW comes out and has the Mongols (the justification for changing them to "militaristic" giving them "riders" and having their first great leader be Ghengis Khan was to represent the Mongols). But ironically enough, despite (or maybe because of) the oddities caused by the last-minute changes to China, they usually end up being a strong AI civ, and I love playing them. They're a really powerful civ.

I'd also agree with a shift for Persia to militaristic/industrious. But, to sum up my feelings on the matter: whatever. The game will work fine either way.

-Arrian

Lord Merciless is offline Lord Merciless
Warlord
USA
Jul 2002
time: 22:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 21:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

China was supposed to be Scientific/Industrious, but Firaxis changed it just before the game shipped. They even didn't have the time to tweak it in the Editor.

Back then, Rome was supposed to be Militaritic/Industrious, and Persians Militaristic/Commercial.

They based their switch on the fact that Great Wall should trigger a GA for China. Well, historically speaking, none of the really strong and powerful Chinese dynasties ever bothered with the Wall. Chinese historians have always considered the wall-building as a sign of weakness.

Arrian is offline Arrian
Emperor
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001
time: 00:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 21:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

Rome as militaristic/industrious did strike me as more appropriate (and would have, in conjunction with the Legionaries, made Rome a powerhouse civ. Oh well).

-Arrian

Hagbart is offline Hagbart
Prince
Copenhagen, Europe
Feb 2002
time: 06:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 22:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Well it can't be changed now.

=DrJambo= is offline =DrJambo=
Warlord
Athens of the North
Jan 2002
time: 05:21
  Old Post 21-08-2002 22:10
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

...but it can....

just maybe not officially.

Dida is offline Dida
Prince

Jan 2000
time: 05:21
  Old Post 22-08-2002 03:10 Visit Dida's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

How is Persia more scientific than China? What contribution did Persia made to the advance of science? I know the Chinese were technocally advanced civ for very long time. Even now, Chinese students seems to be doing quite well in science and math.

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.
Apolyton Time is 00:21.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0451 seconds (88.20% PHP - 11.80% MySQL) with 33 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net