 |
|
Leonidas
|
|
It went GOLD, but it may take a couple of days before it hits the store shelves. . .
Hmmmm. . .
Crusaders, Knights, big castle walls, and grovelling infidels. . .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kyle
|
 |
Evil and I'm also a Capitalist
Jan 1970 time: 00:21
|
|
I never played Shogun, so I can't comment. I look at that part of the game in two ways, diplomacy and other actions. Diplomacy is limited to asking for alliances, cease-fires, and royal marriages. The other things include assasinations, spying, using religious units (Bishops, Alims, etc) to change the worship levels, setting up trade routes, etc.
The strategy portion is fun so far, but diplomacy as we usually think about it, is weak.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
I looks a lot more strategic than Shogun was, which is a good thing imho.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Stuie

|
 |
Have a beer!
Sep 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
I've been playing MTW since last Wednesday. Very much fun!
Yes, diplomacy is pretty tame. Not much going on there. But what I like is that I'm actually spending most of my time on the strategic map - building, planning, sending princesses off to marry into other factions, setting up trade routes, shuffling bishops around - instead of brief stops on the strategy map to get to the next battle. The tech tree is fairly large, and there are a ton of units.
The battle AI seems more robust than in Shogun, with frequent flanking manuevers and the like, even a feinted retreat, regroup, and assualt on my disorganized pursuit. Oops... nice one, AI.
Haven't built a crusade yet (I'm playing as the Danes in my first campaign - no crusades for you! ), but they look to be a fun addition to the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|