 |
|  |
 |
|
Juliennew
|
|
Paris
Jun 2002 time: 06:21
|
|
Do we really need a court and judges ?
But if we really need to create an impeachment procedure, anyone could make a poll for an impeachment but 66% of the total number of citizens must vote "YES" to take effect. With this, we will ensure that political parties won't have too much power to take profit of this procedure. But I don't think we should create courts and judges, our administration is already big. And look : The elections are very soon while we already don't know the exact portfolios of the Directors and the constitution isn't finalized yet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Juliennew
|
|
Paris
Jun 2002 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: look that director made a joke about me lets empeach him! |
I don't think we are silly people to make that.
And the 66% absolute majority is here to make it harder.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darkness' Edge
|
|
i think you're probably right, epistax...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darkness' Edge
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pandemoniak
I keep thinking we need a court, because if anyone can start a poll for empeachment without arguments, it can be passed even with the %age needed. For example : according to the votes for First Commissioner where Crisler has been elected, it would be very easy to impeach him, since he actually got about 35-40% votes. But there's no real reasons to start an impeachment, just political moves. An impartial Court would start an impeachment procedure, by itslef or by request from citizens, when he thinks its appropriated. The only role of that court would be to decide if the impeachment can be legally decided, but only a large majority of citizens can allow this impeachment.
And we actually only need ONE person for that court. |
I disagree on both points here.
So, 60% of the people at the elections voted for either DBTS or myself. It's very, very unlikely that they would all hate Crisler (or any future Commissioner with only 40% of the total vote) so much they would vote to impeach him. Hell, I'd definitely vote against impeachment under those circumstances - and I was his opponent.
Secondly, I think that if we do need a court (which I'm not convinced of), then we should go the whole hog, and appoint 3-5 justices. One is open to abuses of power, and bias.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pandemoniak
|
 |
of Xanadu, French Section of the Apolyton Must Crush Capitalism Party
Jul 2002 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Darkness' Edge
So, 60% of the people at the elections voted for either DBTS or myself. It's very, very unlikely that they would all hate Crisler (or any future Commissioner with only 40% of the total vote) so much they would vote to impeach him. Hell, I'd definitely vote against impeachment under those circumstances - and I was his opponent.
|
Darkness, that was just an example. My point was just to say that we can start an impeachment for just *any* reason, it must have constitutional reasons, and the court is there to judge if it s constitutional or not, because we cant just keep posting and polling to say if something is constitutional or not, I think its far better to have someone who is appointed for that.
quote:
Secondly, I think that if we do need a court (which I'm not convinced of), then we should go the whole hog, and appoint 3-5 justices. One is open to abuses of power, and bias. |
Maybe 3-5 persons is better than having just one judge, but this judge could also be our moderator for the SMAC-DG, so we dont need 3-5 persons, and we cant fing 3-5 persons, and we cant give moderator powers to 3-5 persons.
And remember : the Court is independant of parties, powers, etc...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|