 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jethro83
|
|
Newcastle, Australia
Mar 2002 time: 15:21
|
|
I've had similar problems with the AI. In my most recent game, I ended up on a small continent between India in the west, and Persia in the east. I quickly wiped the Persians out (having obtained the only source of iron on the continent).
As for India, they were trying to send settlers through my territory to fill the vacuum left by my war (I razed and rebuilt mostly). Once I had redeployed my horde of swordsmen to prepare for war with India, I declared war. That didn't slow their flow of settlers any, and they had at the absolute most two spearmen and one warrior protecting their cities, with the odd archer pacing around the borders. What's more, I think the war might have accelerated their flow of settlers. Perhaps they were looking for a place as slaves to my empire. 
So the continual production of settlers is not the only problem here. The AI totally lacks territorial integrity. If you ask them to leave, they should go back to their own territory the way they came in. If you demand that they leave, they should be automoved back into their territory. Not on the other side of your empire, where they were planning to go.
Firaxis has come a long way since they first released the game, and I really enjoy playing it, but there's still work to do. Meanwhile, I will try and make the most of this AI behaviour.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
I rarely see any unescorted settlers.
Except my own. I do it frequently and rarely lose one. Only when there is a fast barbarian unit beyond my vision.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|