 |
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
Here is what I think needs to be done (no way in hell, I know):
1) remove the special anti-trust protection baseball has, and allow new franchises to pop up if people are willing to fund them (DC springs to mind, and NY could support 1-2 more teams). At the same time, if a team is badly run or in a market which cannot support them, allow them to go bankrupt. Them's the breaks.
2) Revenue sharing that makes sense. By this I mean a system which rewards small market teams that are well-run, not one that just takes from the rich and gives to the "poor." In order to do this, we need: a workable definition, in hard numbers, of what exactly constitutes "small market" and "medium market" and "large market." The Baseball Prospectus website has had two different, but very interesting, revenue sharing plans posted in the past weeks. The more recent one would probably kill my favorite team (yep, I'm a Yankees fan), but I like the attempt to evaluate the different markets and what each team is doing with what it has.
3) No more publicly funded stadiums. What the hell is this? We give money to incredibly rich people to build stadiums and then pay more money for tickets? WTF!?
The MLBPA sucks, yes, but I don't favor abolishing it. First off, that's not legal, and it's not right. As much as I loathe Donald Fehr, I accept the player's right to organize.
I do not want total "competitive balance" such that any team can win in any given season. I want a normal development cycle (a team will be good for a few seasons, then be bad for a bit, then be back up there again... assuming they are well-run) with a system that prevents total dominance by the rich teams without screwing them for being successful. A sport needs excellence to be really interesting... I don't want a bunch of mediocre teams so that everyone has a chance. I want everyone to have a chance, with proper management, to become a good team and go on a sustained run, like the Oakland A's have done with nothing but Billy Beane's brilliance (I shudder at the thought of what he could do with a decent payroll).
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Andrew1999
|
|
Can someone explain to me why interleague play is considered such a disaster? I can't see how this affects things one way or the other financially.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
reismark
|
 |
Paragon of Virtue
Jan 1970 time: 00:21
|
|
In putting together my list, I'm trying to be feasible - meaning coming up with something that will improve the game and something that the owners and players could actually agree on. (For example, there's no way the players will ever agree to a hard salary cap, so that's out the window right away.) A lot of these ideas come from a recent SI article, so I take no credit for coming up with them.
Current Labor Deal
-- The two sides are currently $222.8 million apart on the total amount of revenue to share over the life of the deal. Here's how you come to a compromise: Split the difference, let the owners have their ceiling, and let the players have their phasing in. This would give us revenue sharing of $202 million in 2003, $226 million in 2004, $249 million in 2005, and $263 million in 2006. That's almost a billion dollars, and about double what's being paid now.
-- The owners' main concerns with the players' proposed ceilings for the luxury tax is that it would only affect a couple of teams (the Yankees & the Rangers, based on current figures). Take the middle of the road for the initial limit, and split the difference on increases. Give the players a tax-free final year, and agree to higher rates (not as high as the owners are proposing now, but not much lower). This would leave us with a ceiling of $115 million in the first year (this would affect the Yankees, Texas, Los Angeles, & Boston at current rates), $120 million in the second year, and $125 million in the third year, with tax rates from 30%-40%, and a tax-free final year.
-- Each side wins one and loses one on the contraction and drug testing issues. The players agree to random testing for steroids & illegal drugs for the duration of the deal. In exchange, the owners agree that they must clear any contraction attempts with the union.
Ideas for the Future
1) Kill the antitrust exemption. It only adds to baseball's poor public image.
2) Split the role of the commissioner's office - have one guy to handle the financials, and another to handle day-to-day game-related decisions and PR with both the players & the fans. I'd be able to tolerate Selig if he was purely a financial guy.
3) Require teams to come up with affordable ticketing packages so that the average family doesn't need to blow $200 to see a game.
4) Vlad's suggestion: Put home-field advantage in the World Series up for grabs in the All-Star game. And while you're at it, bring a few Futures players on board as backup so that we don't have another tie game fiasco.
5) Launch a national all-MLB digital TV channel, and share revenues from it equally among low-to-mid revenue teams. (This would make a lower local revenue sharing percentage more feasible.)
6) All teams need to have equal access to foreign players, which means killing the bidding process for Japanese players and making Japanese teams deal directly with the league, and putting the Latin American academies under direct control of the league.
7) Use the discretionary fund to assist small-market teams in signing their own players, ala the NBA's Larry Bird exemption.
8) Allow teams to trade their draft choices in both American and international drafts.
9) We've got a Little League World Series - why not a Major League World Series? God knows it would increase MLB's international presence and with it, revenues.
10) For interleague play, pair up natural rivals with each other (and make natural rivals among teams that don't have them) and schedule home-and-home series, plus 2 series against other teams on a rotating basis.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|