 |
|  |
 |
|
DAVOUT
|
 |
AUERSTADT
Jun 2002 time: 05:22
|
|
In the numerous discussions held on pop rushing, those who are reluctant or opposed generally give up when the final argument is exposed : Since the AI does it, we cannot compete without it ; there is nothing to answer to that, at least when we play at the highest levels.
The question raised in this thread deals with another aspect: when the competing AIs don?t do pop rushing any more because they are in Republic as are in our game Greece, England, Germany and Azteks, the argument is no longer valid; but worse, is it really our interest to decrease our population at a time where the other civs increases their own population faster than us? In other words, in still doing pop rushing when our competitors don?t, are not we easily solving short term problems at the expense of our future? Or, is the situation so bad that the only way to survive to-day is to prepare our fall to-morrow?
Your comments and opinions as always greatly appreciated.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:22
|
|
We don'ty really have disadvantages as much as the AI gets bonuses in troop support and shields. Of course, the fact that less citizens are bron content, thus letting unhappiness set in quicker, is a major handicap.
I think that the relative advantage/disadvanatge of pop. rushing must be seen on a case to case basis. Sometimes a certain edifice, like a temple, will be worth more to our civs that the population that died rushing it. Currently our depressed food production (due to despotism) keeps our population relatively low, so pop. ruhsing anythig greater than a temple or spearman is impossible, since it would deplete opur population too severely and create too much unhappiness.
As a princliple I dislike pop. rushing, but on a case by case by case basis, it has its uses. The fact is that we have not used pop. rushing particularly much in this game, and I see its use diminishing in the future, not growing- simply because we will not have enough citizens to afford to rush the more expensive units and buildingd down the line.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shiber
I had no idea the AI does not suffer from corruption/waste at this difficulty level. Are you positively sure of that? |
hi ,
not only that , the AI pays less also , ...
however , with a different government form we shall not loose a citizen if we draft , .... > meaning the moods , the unhappy ones , ....
on top the AI gets to start with extra units , but that is good , it makes the game more fun , ...
now there is also "accellerated build" , this way you can build a bit faster , ...
have a nice day 
Last edited by panag on 01-09-2002 at 00:36
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|