 |
|  |
 |
|
WhiteBandit
|
 |
Southern California
Jul 2002 time: 21:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shiber
According to my experience the AI gets mad at you at first and asks you to leave but once you start improving the terrain (IMHO any improvement, not just road, though we only plan to build a road until Chartres is ours. :evilgrin he forgets about it. |
I just ran a quick mock game in Civ and this appears to be so. I sent a worker stack into a foreign territory and they warned me to remove my units. After that though, they seemed to have forgotten about it. I was even able to use the worker unit as a type of explorer. It was somewhat slow going since I could only move 1 square at a time.
However, this shows that a ROP agreement isn't neccesary in order to connect occupied France in the quickest way possible. I am really hesitant to divert workers from other tasks in order to create a Timeline - Port Rouge road at this current point in time.
Last edited by WhiteBandit on 31-08-2002 at 04:57
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shiber
|
 |
Haifa, Israel
Jul 2002 time: 07:22
|
|
IMHO we can mathematically prove that the French can't possibly assemble an army strong enough to take towns from us (provided that we've garrisoned each town with two veteran spearmen) and then move it into our borders within less than 20 turns. The main reasons for this are as follows:
* All of France's towns, with the exception of Lyons and Besancon are surrounded by crappy territory shield-wise.
* The French currently have iron in two towns, or four after we sign a peace treaty with them (Besancon, Lyons, Rheims and Rouen). All of the abovementioned towns have 1 population, and two (Rheims and Rouen) are surrounded by terrain that is bad shields-wise.
* France has 6 towns with 1 population and 2 with 2 population.
* We are 99% sure that the French don't have a single barracks since we haven't encountered any veteran French units yet, so whatever attack the French can mount within 20 turns (that is, IF they mount an attack) will be made of regular units. Since our garrisons are veterans they have a huge advantage over French attackers.
* France's aggression setting is the lowest possible. Although they are furious at us they are not as likely to declare war as you might think. From my experience at playing civ, France has only declared war on me twice, and both times were in Deity level and after I was already fighting several neighbors (and losing), and even then they declared war in the form of a military alliance with one of the civs already at war with me (meaning they were probably bribed to go to war).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
adaMada
|
 |
"The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Mar 2000 time: 00:22
|
|
My thoughts...
I've got to agree with Togas on this one. This is exactly the same sort of thinking I had with Persia -- they're in REX, they won't dare attack us, the RoP will help stop them. I was proven wrong. Togas, who was against the RoP, was proven right. I don't see that an RoP will help us much now, and I do believe that if we sign one, France has at least an even chance of declaring war again before the twenty turns are over.
Togas is the Foreign Minister -- it is his job to listen to all the input (from everyone), and then make a decision. Sadly, there really isn't a clear cut majority in this case, but that doesn't mean he can just not decide . I think we all should, however, abide by his decision now it's been made, though if anyone has an arguement that they think will win him over they should (of course) post it.
As for cities -- I'm inclined to believe they're worthless. Size one cities, no economic potential, and very currupt -- we'd be better off getting a tech we'll need to defeat the Persians and Germans, and then build our own cities later. I don't think France will be able to regain much of its former power, and those cities should be easy mop up/cultural switch once we take care of our enemies and get our economy rolling.
-- adaMada
|
|
|  |
 |
|
adaMada
|
 |
"The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Mar 2000 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Aggie
Adamada, that is why I mentioned doing it without the Rop. It still is a good deal. Also there is a real risk we can lose Port rouge if we continue. Yes the odds are in our favor, but if the archer attacks we could lose. Since ROP and money were Togas main arguements against peace and the deal I proposed I think I have answered those concerns since even w/o ROP it is a Wonderful deal. Also NOTHING we do now will help us get a better deal. In short waiting can only hurt us not help us.
Aggie |
Togas' plan was basically to wait maybe two turns, and then do it, right?
It's not a major wait, and (since we are doing a turnchat) he or whoever else from Foreign Ministry who's there could do it early if anything got really bad. Having said that, I don't think it'll be a major problem -- we're talking about two turns, which we'd need anyway to get enough money based on the plans that I've seen (which involve spending some cash on the first turn).
Sorry if I'm off base here -- I missed the whole fact that timing was even an issue here. I kind of assumed that the two turn thing was ok with everyone, but I must have missed a post or two about timing, or only read the parts of them about other issues... my mistake. (Still not sure how I managed that :confused .
-- adaMada
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:22
|
|
And of course if a consensus cannot be reached the final decision might well fall to me...
Just so I get this straight, there are a LOT of posts here with changes, additions etc, and it's easy to get confused.
The two main views as I see them
1. Some elimination of visible French units, sacking of Rheims, then go for peace after about 2 turns. Peace MUST include Feudalism, anything else we can get but NO ROP.
2. Peace NOW, in which we go for the cities, ROP and Feudalism in a deal afterwards or we get Feudalism in a peace now and leave the cities for a future campaign.
ROP: WhiteBandit, Shiber, Spiffor, GenghisFarb, Aggie prefers
No ROP: Togas, Aggie can live with it, adaMada
Feudalism now: Shiber, Aro, Spiffor, GenghisFarb, Togas, Apocalypse(?), adaMada
Cities now, Feudalism after: Aggie
From these results it seems to me that Feudalism is the priority for the peace deal and, as said, everything else is just gravy. Sorry Aggie, it seems you are in a minority here. 
The ROP is a bit more contentious, and I really hope some decision can be made soon. Personally I don't want to bond ourselves to any such commitments for 20 turns, that potentially opens us up to French invaders with only 100 gold recompense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:22
|
|
I can live without RoP : the French will charge us more when we buy feudalism, but we should be able to get much money back.
But I still think we MUST have peace NOW, and I strongly disagree with Togas. Should we lose Port Rouge, this whole thread will be pointless, because the conditions for peace will be completely different.
Should we lose one or 2 swordsmen, our attack of America will suffer a delay.
The worst is : Should we raze Rheims, the Greeks will settle the place. Don't forget the Greeks are in Golden Age, and their core is right next to Rheims. They'll get the 24 shields they need for a settler in no time. OTOH, our core is much further, and no settler is currently being built ; our closest roads are also pretty far away.
2 turns later is not a "minor wait" : it's a major change. And I think this change will be worse for us. Togas, I urge you to think more on this issue, and to change your mind.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shiber
|
 |
Haifa, Israel
Jul 2002 time: 07:22
|
|
I don't see how we can compare this case to the Persian incident. Persia has an aggression setting of 4/5, France has an aggression setting of 1/5. Persia was bribed into the war, they did not prepare for it, and hence all the free slaves we got.
Furthermore, a lot of people are still afraid of France turning back on us regardless of the fact that France has the weakest economy and production infrastructure in Abananaba Major, second only to America.
I do not regard RoPs as means for gaining money. However, when someone is offering you so much money for something he can't possibly use against you, why pass the offer down?
However, after doing the math and consulting the civ3mod.bic file regarding the cost of various techs I have reached the conclusion that if we buy Feudalism from France for 345 gold (the price they would sell it to us for if we don't offer a RoP) we can get Monarchy and ~90 gold from Rome for Feudalism and then sell Monarchy back to France for ~320 gold, so in the end the RoP would make us merely 25 gold. I still think France is no threat, but if the monitary gain from a RoP is as low as that then there's no point arguing about whether we should sign it or not.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shiber
|
 |
Haifa, Israel
Jul 2002 time: 07:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
I can live without RoP : the French will charge us more when we buy feudalism, but we should be able to get much money back.
But I still think we MUST have peace NOW, and I strongly disagree with Togas. Should we lose Port Rouge, this whole thread will be pointless, because the conditions for peace will be completely different.
Should we lose one or 2 swordsmen, our attack of America will suffer a delay.
The worst is : Should we raze Rheims, the Greeks will settle the place. Don't forget the Greeks are in Golden Age, and their core is right next to Rheims. They'll get the 24 shields they need for a settler in no time. OTOH, our core is much further, and no settler is currently being built ; our closest roads are also pretty far away.
2 turns later is not a "minor wait" : it's a major change. And I think this change will be worse for us. Togas, I urge you to think more on this issue, and to change your mind. |
Well spoken Spiffor. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|