 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GeneralTacticus
Then why did he discount every piece of intelligence that was sent to him indicating that Hitler was going to attack? |
Because he was paronoid who beleived that he is smarter then Hitler. And he beleive that he triked Hitler with non-aggerssion pact and that untill Germany in war with GB, Hitler will not attack SU.
quote: I'm saying that if Stalin just moved in after the Germans to establish a buffer zone, the Finns would most likely have their hands full with Hitler. |
Sure.
But, Stalin was SURE that Finns WILL GIVE right of passage to Hitler, and he saw no reason for Hitler to invade Finland if he would have everything he wanted without war- the right of passage for Hitler's army.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GeneralTacticus
|
 |
of Melbourne, Australia
Dec 2001 time: 15:22
|
|
quote: But, Stalin was SURE that Finns WILL GIVE right of passage to Hitler, and he saw no reason for Hitler to invade Finland if he would have everything he wanted without war- the right of passage for Hitler's army. |
Why was that?
Last edited by GeneralTacticus on 14-09-2002 at 11:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:22
|
|
quote: Why would that make him think his intelligence was false? |
Because, he was crazy paranoid. I have not different explanation. So many different sources tells him that war will start at summer of 1941, but he refused to beleive in this, refused to admit that Hitler acted smarter the he, refused to accept defeat of his "diplmatic gift".
One word- paranoid. When the war started he spend few days on hysteria, instead of made of decisions.
Last edited by Serb on 14-09-2002 at 12:07
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:22
|
|
No bases, like in case of Baltic states. Just land exchange. He offered bigger lands in Korelia (iirc) on exchange for Finnish lands near Leningrad.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:22
|
|
By the way, serb, I haven't abandoned our discussion, I'm just pretty short on time. I'll get around to replying one of these days, but it's obvious by now that we're getting nowhere with each other.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
Awww...c'mon Tass...I was bein' serious! Whassamatter? Have you never seen an American not chest-beating, and therefore are so stunned by it that you assume it a troll?
Sure the USA sucks! All that tripe about the US of A producing 50% of the world's output just after wwii....pure propoganda. At it's highest, it was no more than 12% of global output. Same with the sum-total size of the economy. We all have econo-envy over here, and we just make up the numbers to make ourselves feel better. It's well known in the states that Rwanda has had a consistently higher GDP since 1984.
Standard of living....pah! The postcard industry is doing a booming business over here, selling pretty pictures of houses with white picket fences....the reality is that 80% or more of the population lives out of mini-storage facilities with one bathroom per row of a hundred.
Military? The Nerf corporation makes all our weapons, so you can imagine the global threat we truly are....
-=Vel=- |
Ok, now that was just bad.
.001/10. Better luck next time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
King of Rasslin
|
|
Americans work more than Europeans. In Spain, their "siesta" time is a 3 hour nap. We get enough time to eat a sandwich for lunch, and then keep working. That's why we are more productive. We aren't lazy and we don't have nearly as much welfare as Euros.
I will give France a little credit for helping us back in the Revolutionary War, but we saved them from the evil Germans so they should be nicer to us.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tinyp3nis
|
 |
compensate this!!
May 2002 time: 07:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Serb
No bases, like in case of Baltic states. Just land exchange. He offered bigger lands in Korelia (iirc) on exchange for Finnish lands near Leningrad. |
Damn, i didnt think youd say anything about that, but you did and now you made me waste my time with google . Just to be sure im not completely losing my memory.
Qoute from one of the sites:
"At the beginning of October 1939, the Soviet Union faced Finland with certain territorial demands. The ensuing negotiations in Moscow, lasting about two months, were inconclusive. The reason for the lack of results was that loss of the areas concerned, the Karelian isthmus and the naval base on the Hanko peninsula, would have critically undermined Finland's defence. At the time, the Soviet Union already had control of Estonia."
There it is, Hanko naval base. Found many sources with google, if you doubt me you are free to search too.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|