 |
|  |
 |
|
cavebear
|
 |
of the Pleistocene
Oct 1999 time: 00:22
|
|
I recall seeing discussion about aiming for AC rather than military conquest, and something about not using the Ironclad Strategy this time. Was a consensus ever reached? Some other *general* guidelines could be established as well. I'll keep a list updated here at the top.
1. AC or Military Conquest? AC 13, Military 2
2. Use SuperIronclad Strategy? No 10, Yes 2
3. Democratic government or Communism? Demo 9, Any 4, Com 0
4. Attacking or defending military strategy? Att 1, Def 6, Both 3
5. Caravans mainly for Trade or for Wonders? Both 10
6. Wonders or individual city structures (e.g., Great Wall or City Walls)? Won 10, No Won 1
7. Establish a specific "science" city? Yes 2, OK 5, No 3
8. Use of Dips/Spies: Stealing, Bribing, and/or Destruction? Theft 1, Bribe 1, Dest 2
I realize that some are not entirely either/or questions; they are just general goals. It's just that I know we will will do certain things if we don't "encourage" ourselves not to.
Updated Sep 10...

Last edited by cavebear on 11-09-2002 at 04:43
|
|
|  |
 |
|
H Tower
|
|
i think that with our slow start, we need to go conquer a little bit before we turn our eyes to the stars, we need more land!
I don't have any qualms using the ironclad strategy if its called for, it seems silly to hinder ourselves like that, ok maybe if we had jumped out to a huge lead we could, but i just don't see that now.
Let's still try for AC, its not too late!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darkness' Edge
|
|
1. Military conquest...we decided against AC last time for good reason
2. If we have to, preferably not.
3. Democratic government ASAP
4. We shouldn't be setting this beforehand, make up our mind at the time.
5. Both
6. see civman's suggestion
7. No need.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
atomant
|
 |
Aussie, no longer lost in Africa
Jul 2002 time: 15:22
|
|
Agree with most of the 8 points above... including the use of spies for stealing tech and so forth.
In terms of I propose that our President should be forced to accept a cease fire (note i did not say peace) if it is offered. Furthermore, perhaps we, as a civilisation should restrict ourselves and not act pre-emptively in starting hostilities. Ie: we must mantain a spotless reputation. I define preemptive as actively attacking cities/units. The use of spies or diplomacy to get another Civ to declare war does not count.
If the population of Apolyton agrees to it, perhaps enforcing this on ourselves until the development of tactics (or tictacs if you prefer),would be a way making the game more challenging. We are afterall supposed to be playing a democratic game, and democracies are legendary (in terms of stupidty) for handicapping themselves is such a fashion.
After tactics, as long as we maintain representative government, all bets are off... Bring on the BOmbers, armour, howies etal..... let the real battle begin!!!!!!!¬
Thoughts and comments welcome.
Cheers from deepest darkest Africa
AA
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|