 |
|
Keygen
|
|
Athens, Hellas
Jan 2000 time: 07:22
|
|
What about the PBEM Tournament I am supposed to start within September?
It will include 1x1, 2x2 and 4-player matches...
Last edited by Keygen on 05-09-2002 at 00:15
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kalius
|
 |
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002 time: 16:22
|
|
Keygen, I suppose your totally against the idea of a SuperLeague, or you haven't read the objective of the league. 
Well, consider the following statements: 
1. SuperLeague is a TEAM EFFORT. Unlike the rankings, PBEM challenges, or your tournament, one person dosen't win.
2. The rankings are for all types of games, not just 1 on 1, or 2 on 2 matches.
3. The Team status makes it twice as easy, or twice as hard to win. Consider this. You have your partner, and he's just been obliterated. Now, you are against 2 people in an allied pact. You'll lose points, because you'll never get ahead every x9 turn against 2 opponents, and you have to concentrate on them one by one.
4. This idea has never been created on 'poly as far as I know (i.e. the TEAM LEAGUE idea, so don't throw Lungmatch, or Team Spirit at me)
5. The winner won't necessarily be the best players, it also has communication involved too, unlike the rankings or your tournament
Just a few points on why the SuperLeague isn't a bad idea.
-------------------------------------------------------
And Keygen, I'm actually quite insulted your accusing my idea as just overloading players with more games , as I have specifically said to other players on Apolyton, and yourself that you cannot have more than 2 games running. If your accusing the SuperLeague of burning out players, why not have the same rule on the normal games?
Last edited by Kalius on 06-09-2002 at 11:50
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Keygen
|
|
Athens, Hellas
Jan 2000 time: 07:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by redbull
1. SuperLeague is a TEAM EFFORT. Unlike the rankings, PBEM challenges, or your tournament, one person dosen't win.
|
The Tribal (2x2) category of the tournament is about team effort as well.
quote: Originally posted by redbull
2. The rankings are for all types of games, not just 1 on 1, or 2 on 2 matches.
|
It figures 
quote: Originally posted by redbull
3. The Team status makes it twice as easy, or twice as hard to win. Consider this. You have your partner, and he's just been obliterated. Now, you are against 2 people in an allied pact. You'll lose points, because you'll never get ahead every x9 turn against 2 opponents, and you have to concentrate on them one by one.
|
That's similar to all team games currently in progress and exactly the same in Tribal. What's your point?
quote: Originally posted by redbull
4. This idea has never been created on 'poly as far as I know (i.e. the TEAM LEAGUE idea, so don't throw Lungmatch, or Team Spirit at me)
|
It has. Tribes by Gavrushka some months ago but since it was never implemented you can claim some sort of that 
quote: Originally posted by redbull
5. The winner won't necessarily be the best players, it also has communication involved too, unlike the rankings or your tournament
|
Not the best? Not true regarding the one on one. True for two on two but that is also true for any game more than 2 players. E.g. in a 3-player game the two weaker can ally and beat the stronger one 
quote: Originally posted by redbull
Just a few points on why the SuperLeague isn't a bad idea.
|
I think I mentioned in an earlier post of mine that it's not a bad idea too 
quote: Originally posted by redbull
And Keygen, I'm actually quite insulted your accusing my idea as just overloading players with more games , as I have specifically said to other players on Apolyton, and yourself that you cannot have more than 2 games running. If your accusing the SuperLeague of burning out players, why not have the same rule on the normal games?
|
Insulted? 
You're pretty touchy, aren't you? 
When did I accused you for burning out players? In the contrary your league might drag new people in our community in the future, who knows? 
I only need all available resources for the tournament while perhaps you don't, at list straightforward 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kalius
|
 |
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002 time: 16:22
|
|
quote:
No, I am not
In the contrary I would support it if the timing wasn't bad.
It's just that some people might have tight schedule and joinning new games - even 2 - might force them to refrain from joinning further games for the next months. Now a tournament counts only if many people participate. Besides the first stage will end in 2-3 months leaving at list half of the participants in all categories out of the tournament
I only ask that people are notified for the tournament before they join other games and decide what to choose |
Hmmm... Keygen, perhaps we can come to some sort of agreement on this. Perhaps, I could change the rules slightly, so that a team can only have one superleague game running for the duration of the first 2 rounds of your tournament, then as player get K.Oed, we can make it so players in the SuperLeague and have been K.Oed from the Tourney can have 2 games running. thus, it would be no different to having a regular PBEM game running.
quote: quote:
Originally posted by redbull
5. The winner won't necessarily be the best players, it also has communication involved too, unlike the rankings or your tournament
Not the best? Not true regarding the one on one. True for two on two but that is also true for any game more than 2 players. E.g. in a 3-player game the two weaker can ally and beat the stronger one |
I was actually referring to the outcome of the league. If one team are good at team work, they'll get more points than a team with just one player doing 1 on 1 challenges.
Also, as for you and Locutus' idea, the SuperLeague could slow down (like we'll do for Keygen's tourney) for the duration the event, and such.
I am sorry for causing this disagreement. If you still don't agree with any of my suggestions of slowing the SuperLeague so your tournament can go ahead as planned. I would be more than happy to allow your tournament to take presidence over the current PBEM games, and my SuperLeague if worst comes to worst. I believe that there will be a mass slowing in PBEM turn rates, with two major competitions starting at more or less the same time.
Also, if anyone had replied to me, when I asked about a PBEM tourney, then I wouldn't have started the League 
Last edited by Kalius on 07-09-2002 at 02:04
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kalius
|
 |
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002 time: 16:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by redbull
Okay... Quinns prefers the idea of a simple ladder, which I agree with for 1 on 1 challenges. However, the fact that there are 1 on 1 and 2x2 games make a ladder impractical. However I am already discussing with Quinns about the SuperLeague, but no clear path has been defined. It would seem, from my point of view, that the SuperLeague would have to be separate, unless myself or Quinns can come to an agreement on this. |
Update on the Quinns-SuperLeague talks:
I have e-mailed Quinns an idea, which has the PBEM Challenges going toward SuperLeague points. Thus, We can still have the ladder for 1 on 1 challenges, and have 1 on 1 challenges in the SuperLeague. However, Quinns is aware of the possible flaws in the pointing system, and I will draw up a draft of the rules tonight NZST (GMT + 12), hopefully diminishing these bugs. So, it's still 50-50 in the talks, but hopefully I can get the 1 on 1 challenges to suit all
Although the outlook for 1 on 1 challenges is promising, the lack of 2 on 2 challenges mean that a separate 2 on 2 challenges is in order, so I'm sorry I couldn't do anything preventing this.
So, the look I'm gunning for is:
1 on 1 challenges are in the PBEM challenge thread, and all matches have an outcome on the SuperLeague table.
2 on 2 challenges are in a separate thread, and will have an outcome on the SuperLeague table.
I hope this will satisfy all concerned, especially Solv and Keygen because they seem to have got rather annoyed at the timing of the League.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|