 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:22
|
|
Civ2 was great for its time, however that time has now passed.
I don't think I could ever go back to civ2 after playing civ3, just such a vast improvement in every aspect of the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by asleepathewheel
Civ2 was great for its time, however that time has now passed.
I don't think I could ever go back to civ2 after playing civ3, just such a vast improvement in every aspect of the game. |
Except for combat.
I mainly play SMAC because IMO, its far ahead of both Civ2 and Civ3.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tassadar5000
Except for combat.
I mainly play SMAC because IMO, its far ahead of both Civ2 and Civ3. |
I don't see what the big deal is with Civ2's combat system.
In Civ3, I rarely have results that shock me, if that's what you're referring to, the tank killer spearmen?
but. in Civ2- howitzers. I don't think I need to say anything else about Civ2's combat system.
civ2 (and SMAC): Air power is too unbalanced, too powerful. now the airforce is complimentary, which is more realistic, IMHO.
SMAC certainly has its nice points, UN, SE, etc, but I would take the resource/culture/trade improvements any day over them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Heresson
|
 |
of frogs
Jun 2000 time: 06:22
|
|
Why do You think that civ2 isn't a classic? Of course it is!!
Any game that I play...
Sabrewolf has some right. But even if there'll be a possibility of making civ3 scns, some unique sollutions shall be lost, as
some of them were based on bugs... And there is still so much to do... Civ2 scenarios were evoluating, from silly scns of large numbers to rare, but highly complicated and modified games, I'd call the games rather than scenarios.
I think that yet, civ2 offers the widest oportunities for altering it of all games. Civ2 isn't only a game, it's a gate
to many many beautiful games. OK, surely oneday there'll be
scenarios for civ3 and I don't doubt they'll be good, perhaps
even as good as some civ2 scns... But I don't mean that there won't be good scns. I mean that if people forget about
civ2, they loose the unique possibility of playing old scns.
I have a vision. No-one plays civ2 anymore... Civ2 is in 'classic games" subforum where only from time to time grey-bearded Heresson puts some flowers and a candle.
Winds are blowing over the dead links to places that once were civ2 sites... So hard to light the match....
And it's all your fault! 
A shame that your scns were lost, Palaiologos.
But seriously, why do You consider civ2 obsolete?
As a game, yes, I guess it is, but as long as Firaxis didn't
research "civ3 scn" tech yet, You can't replace civ2scns
with any new units.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Martin Gühmann
|
 |
Berlin, Germany
Mar 2001 time: 06:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Heresson
I think that yet, civ2 offers the widest oportunities for altering it of all games. |
I disagree here, even in its current state Civ3 offers more oportunities to alter the game via the editor. But of course these oportunities are limited in comparision to CTP2, it has scenarios all the text files are open, you can even modify the user interface in a limited way, you have slic that allows you to change the rhules even more radical as it will be ever possible in Civ3. (Actual if I remember correctly there was something like this in Civ2 but very limited, maybe you aren't totally wrong here.)
quote: Originally posted by Heresson
But I don't mean that there won't be good scns. I mean that if people forget about civ2, they loose the unique possibility of playing old scns. |
Therefore you still have a copy of Civ2.
quote: Originally posted by Heresson
But seriously, why do You consider civ2 obsolete?
As a game, yes, I guess it is, but as long as Firaxis didn't
research "civ3 scn" tech yet, You can't replace civ2scns
with any new units. |
Actual it would be very difficuilt to convert Civ2 scenarios from to Civ3 or to CTP2. For instance you need new graphics even Civ3 uses only 8bit graphics (actual for units the case is not so simple), you have to size Civ2 units up and fix their look, but that means actual to redraw them. You have to remake the map or at least fix it if you can convert it from Civ2.
Of course if you want to remind people to go back to Civ2 and don't forget its possibilities and the good recalls, then it is ok, but you can't force them. And actual when I remember why I quit Civ2, then my answer would be a plain no, I moved to many units over the map. (But that would actual not too much happen in a scenario.)
-Martin
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|