 |
|  |
 |
|
Adagio

|
|
WTC was beautiful... sure, I haven't seen them in real life, but on the photos of NY skyline, they were great... Though I don't hope, they'll make them exact the same again, as mentioned before: The new towers should be bigger, better and prettier... If they just build a park (Or just normal buildings), then the terrorists would have won
I just read an article in a danish science "newspaper" (Illustreret videnskab: illustrated science (I think that'll be the translation)), were they are showing a few of the good ideas on how the towers should be re-built... One of the pictures are showing four towers hanging together as two towers...looks really great... Has anyone found a website, were the ideas are shown, I'd like to see more of the ideas..?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kepler
|
 |
Lovely Oregon
Jul 2002 time: 21:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chris 62
If you had seen the towers, you would never call them ugly, they were as impressive as they were graceful, elegant in form and function, two more beautiful buildings would he hard to find.
I saw them being built, in their glory, and when they fell, there was nothing ugly about them but their end. |
I watched them go up and lived within sight of them for years. They weren't ugly or elegant, they were just boring. They always looked like they ought to lean on each other to keep from falling asleep.
There are truly ugly (Prudential, Sears Tower) and truly elegant (Hancock, Chrysler) skyscrapers. WTC was just 100+ stories of disinterest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|