 |
|
Kaak
|
|
Bah, the gov is a means to an end. Without it, there would be anarchy, and in anarchy i'm pretty sure that i wouldn't have as much property as i have now.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
to clarify: though they take some, i end up with more than i would otherwise
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
Besides roland, it is actually in our constitution that we have a responsibility to overthrow the government if they are violating our findamental rights...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
I think he means it is in the Declaration of Independance:
WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness -- That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
cmon, i can't be bothered to look it up. it is in there though. Our constitution and other founding documents are based heavily on locke's two treatises on gov't.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
yup, i was wrong. definately declaration of independance....i just knew i heard it in my gov't class oh so many years ago...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dunk
|
 |
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 2002 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ron Jeremy
Not only that- he had a record of violence and carrying knives. Has anyone considered that he may have lured the "burglar" to his house with the intention of settling a score? |
Maybe if it were mentioned in the article. I would think that the prosecution would have brought evidence of that type to the trial and it would have been in the article. But, well, it wasn't.
The article said:
quote: Peter Kyte, QC, for the prosecution, told the jury: “The law recognises a man is entitled to defend himself, his family and his property only if his action does not go beyond the reasonable and the necessary.
“There is no doubt Mr Hastings stumbled across a burglary. There is no doubt that Roger Williams was a thoroughly bad hat in the eyes of the law. But, as a human being, he is just as entitled to the freedom to live as anyone else. We argue that, in this case, alas, this man overstepped the mark and went some distance beyond that.” |
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|