 |
|
Aro
|
 |
Ipanema
Jul 2002 time: 02:22
|
|
Maybe not. It's a strategy for long term, and we need to plan carefully. I changed the palace sometimes in my games, and I’ve got an incredible gain in production. Later in the game, we will be able to change the palace location in 20 turns or less. In the industrial era, of course. Before that, it takes too much time.
The Ghengis idea is interesting, I never thought in rotates the palace as a strategy, but sounds doable.
By now, if we going to change the palace, we have to think in a definitive place (at least for a loooong time...), and we need the FP first.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GhengisFarb
|
 |
I want my HAMBURGERS!!
May 2002 time: 23:22
|
|
Basically you build one region at a time. For example, we'd start with Uber and once we've got it's improvements caught up it would move to the second region where the palace site started working on the Palace many turns before.
It's much cheaper than hurrying everything with money.
Last edited by GhengisFarb on 12-09-2002 at 05:48
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:22
|
|
We need to decide on how soon we need the FP/Palace reshuffle. If, for example, we take Persia completely (what a fantastic dream!), we need one of them in Persia. Thius would be sufficient unitl we managed to COMPLETELY take either Rome or some other area of decent land. This will take a long time, possibly until the Industrial ages, when building the Palace can take only 20 turns or so as mentioned. Let us not worry about any "ultimate" position for the FP and Palace.
How about some slightly less long-term, bit more visible situations? If we take Persia, should we build the FP in 'Poly (the country, not the city) and relocate the Palace to Persia. Or do we want the FP in Persia, hoping to move the Palace somewhere better than 'Poly in the future? Or do we instead want one in Uber, one in Poly; or shall the Government abandon Poly completely and head to Persia and Uber?
Personally, I think that, should we manage to take Persia, we should build either the Palace or FP here, and have the other in Poly. That way we will be making the most out of what we have without waiting for some pie-in-the-sky perfect opportunity before reshuffling things. We should be realistic - if we get this chance, we seize it - we can't expect to take all the best areas we want.
One more thing - if the war with Persia goes badly and we need to make a quick peace, what then? Do we risk relocating the Palace and FP so that one is on Uber, one on the mainland, in order to max our production? I don't like this idea very much, especially since Uber is about as close to Poly as most of our other cities are, so it should be fairly productive for a while anyway. I'd much rather we waited till we got some decent land elsewhere before building the FP. Of course, if we are way behind and it is looking unlikely that we will manage to take ANYthing without the benefits of the FP, that is different, but it is ages away. Well, at least one age.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|