 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Vel,
Your thinking is flawed. You are totally ignoring the fact that Hussein has flaunted the terms of the ceasefire for over ten years and commited atrocity after atrocity against his own people. Children starve while he pursues the ultimate weapon. If we do not strike against this tyrant we are moral cowards.
Respectfully,
jt
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
before you do anything though let me know 'cause i have to go buy my pop corn and see you kill eachother. (it's not the same without pop corn)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:22
|
|
I thought about that aspect of it, JT, and compelling arguments could be made that our own sanctions in place against Iraq are the root cause of the starvation. They're surely not doing much of anything to the man who has no less than fourteen different palatial homes scattered about his dusty nation.
Indirectly then, WE are the cause of the starvation. True, causally, Sadam himself is, as the sanctions are only in place because of his refusal to cooperate, but it's easy enough for his spin doctors to play it the other way.
That he flagrantly violates the terms of the peace is cause enough for the sanctions, surely, but full-scale war? I dunno. Certainly not without the support of the key players in the coalition last time we went rounds with him.
As to attrocities against his own people.....while I sympathize with them and their plight of having to live under the rule of one of the region's less-savory characters, his internal affairs and treatment of his people is certainly barbaric by our (western) standards, but again, unless there is a formal call for outside assistance--as per when Kuwait requested our aid--then I submit that we should not raise a hand against him.
Now....if a well-organized subversive group inside the nation put out an ABP for assistance, then by all means, we should rise to the occassion and answer their plea for help, but that changes the fundamental equation considerably. At that point, we're not lashing out at someone who might, at some point down the road, do something we don't like, we're answering a genuine call for help.
Puts an entirely different face on it in my book.
-=Vel=-
(of course, all this should be taken with a grain of salt....I'm one of those kooks who STILL, to this day has serious questions about the events of 9/11, not the least of which are "where's the torn up lawn from the plane that, according to the official story, hit the lawn and plowed into the building", and "why was there presidential pressure to quell any and all investigations into events surrounding that day") 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by jimmytrick
Vel,
Your thinking is flawed. You are totally ignoring the fact that Hussein has flaunted the terms of the ceasefire for over ten years and commited atrocity after atrocity against his own people. If we do not strike against this tyrant we are moral cowards.
Respectfully,
jt |
Jesus. Turkey does the exact same things and it is your ally and you support it in doing it. Such hypocricy makes 9/11 so make sense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Answer me little bastard jimmytrick. You paragon of morality. How long must the world grind its teeth at your sponsored foreign state murders and your sponsored coup d'etat murders?
Take your time thinking. I will check this thread later.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Cockney, there is no oil in Cyprus...
Thank you for exposing this whole charade. Enjoy your IRA.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:22
|
|
bad day paiktis?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:22
|
|
The last time I checked, the objective of the 1990-91 Gulf War was the liberation of Kuwait, not the invasion of Iraq and subsequent occupation of Baghdad and removal of Saddam Hussein.
Perhaps it's easy to "forget" that little aspect now, nearly 12 years later, or dismiss it anyway, but I really don't think our Arab allies at the time would've been pleased had we gone beyond the objectives. In fact, it's my understanding that it was behind-the-scenes pressure, in addition to the limits of the UN mandate, that led to coalition forces coming to a halt in southern Iraq.
Not that "Stormin" Norman Schwartzkopf was pleased. From what I've heard, he told Bush Sr., et al., that he was only 30 to 40 minutes away from Baghdad. I believe he also stated something about cutting the head off the snake ... and that's something that didn't happen in 1991.
We stopped short, and ever since a number of folks have been conveniently forgetting or dismissing *why* we stopped short.
Gatekeeper
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Vel,
You surely don't subscribe to the theory that 4,000 Jews were told not to report to work on 9/11?
France is floating a trial ballon at the UN that Iraq be given a three week ultimatim. Still in debate is whether action will be sanctioned now or would require a further resolution after the expiration of the three week period.
I will agree with you on one point Vel. The time for sanctions is at an end. We have allowed too many innocents to die in Iraq already.
jt
|
|
|  |
 |
|
KrazyHorse
|
 |
Macedonia
May 2001 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Gatekeeper
The last time I checked, the objective of the 1990-91 Gulf War was the liberation of Kuwait, not the invasion of Iraq and subsequent occupation of Baghdad and removal of Saddam Hussein.
Perhaps it's easy to "forget" that little aspect now, nearly 12 years later, or dismiss it anyway, but I really don't think our Arab allies at the time would've been pleased had we gone beyond the objectives. In fact, it's my understanding that it was behind-the-scenes pressure, in addition to the limits of the UN mandate, that led to coalition forces coming to a halt in southern Iraq.
Not that "Stormin" Norman Schwartzkopf was pleased. From what I've heard, he told Bush Sr., et al., that he was only 30 to 40 minutes away from Baghdad. I believe he also stated something about cutting the head off the snake ... and that's something that didn't happen in 1991.
We stopped short, and ever since a number of folks have been conveniently forgetting or dismissing *why* we stopped short.
Gatekeeper |
I know why it happened...but it makes me angry.
If the West was going to go in and slaughter a couple of hundred thousand Iraqis, we should also have given the ones we didn't kill something to pay them back...like getting rid of Saddam.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Vel, show me ONE NATION that has done such a dirty record as you involving third countries. If you say USSR, then ok you're the same. Take pleasure in that.
Cockney, does that change anything?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Gatekeeper
The last time I checked, the objective of the 1990-91 Gulf War was the liberation of Kuwait, not the invasion of Iraq and subsequent occupation of Baghdad and removal of Saddam Hussein.
Perhaps it's easy to "forget" that little aspect now, nearly 12 years later, or dismiss it anyway, but I really don't think our Arab allies at the time would've been pleased had we gone beyond the objectives. In fact, it's my understanding that it was behind-the-scenes pressure, in addition to the limits of the UN mandate, that led to coalition forces coming to a halt in southern Iraq.
Not that "Stormin" Norman Schwartzkopf was pleased. From what I've heard, he told Bush Sr., et al., that he was only 30 to 40 minutes away from Baghdad. I believe he also stated something about cutting the head off the snake ... and that's something that didn't happen in 1991.
We stopped short, and ever since a number of folks have been conveniently forgetting or dismissing *why* we stopped short.
Gatekeeper |
I don't know why but I can report that almost 100% of the people I know here in America was disgusted with it. I think in the end that is why George Bush lost his reelection bid.
It was a mistake.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
The ease by which you bypass such questions BTW gives leverage to people who claim that only strikes at the heart of your countries (inocents not inocents who the **** cares, obviously you don't) will make you listen.
just like the palestinians did to get support (and got it).
the road to heaven is paved with bad ones then :shrugs:
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
vel, thank you for comparing the US to Nazi Germany. That says a lot.
Felch X, please. you didnt fail. you didnt care. if you wanted to redeem yourselves you wouldnt attack iraq but force turkey to respect human rights and get out of cyprus and then go on from there
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:22
|
|
like felch said, the fact that we didn't do anything in cyprus doesn't mean we wouldn't have been justified in doing something or make the gulf war any less justified.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
frogger, you're canadian FFS.
vel, same difference
cockney, it shows that you have double standards to say the least. at the same time you support a regime like turkey and at the same time you protect the innocents of iraq? please.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:22
|
|
where did you get the idea that i 'support' the turkish government's actions from?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|