 |
Which do you like?
This poll is closed. |
| every radical order from a director has to be polled. YES |
   |
16 |
69.57% |
| every radical order from a director has to be polled. NO |
   |
7 |
30.43% |
| if alpha talent if to hardly pressed for time the runner-up alpha talent takes his place. YES |
   |
12 |
52.17% |
| if alpha talent if to hardly pressed for time the runner-up alpha talent takes his place. NO |
   |
10 |
43.48% |
| in official polls first post no voting answers may be posted. YES |
   |
17 |
73.91% |
| in official polls first post no voting answers may be posted. NO |
   |
4 |
17.39% |
| Total: |
23 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Darkness' Edge
|
|
I second TKG's suggestions with director's orders.
I suggest clarifying the first post amendment, changing "voting answers" to "opinions".
Thirdly, I think the suggestion for a new alpha talent here is a little bit flawed.
In the first elections, with the amount of interest, we ended up with a 3-way contest for President. If this ever happens again, it's unlikely it will after a few months - hell, even the Civ3 game is having presidents elected unchallenged at the moment. If the election was a two-horse race, it makes that amendment redundant.
In these circumstances, I supported your taking over as Alpha Talent. But I wouldn't support putting this in the constitution.
I propose that the Alpha Talent is elected, along with all the other posts, and that when the Alpha Talent resigns/is impeached/takes over as Commissioner, the people elect a new alpha talent.
To support this, once again, look at the Civ3 game. MWIA was elected President there last time, unopposed. If they didn't directly elect their VP, there would have been serious problems. We're not as big as that, and we can probably expect unopposed elections to happen sooner rather than later.
Finally, I won't vote here. I don't necessarily oppose DBTS' suggestions - but I want them changed, so I don't support them either.
Last edited by Darkness' Edge on 14-09-2002 at 05:18
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:22
|
|
*every radical order from a director has to be polled.
Yes. Directors should have a little leeway, and not need to poll on every decision (especially when there are zillions of formers/crawlers about), but every DRASTIC decision needs to be polled. If, in a chat there is an important issue that comes up, the chat must stop in light of this new, drastic development. We can't have the small proportion of the voting talents able to make the chat making decision of large magnitude. Quickpolls are all the good for changing the troops movements in light of an unexpected worm appearance (for example), but they are not Constitutional and can only be used for small alterations on already existing orders. Even if the first turn ends and someone attacks us from out of nowhere, we must stop and decide what to do with the full polling system.
*if alpha talent if to hardly pressed for time the runner-up alpha talent takes his place.
No. I am fully happy with an Alpha Talent being able to take over as Commish, but that does not mean I am happy with the next in line getting the same authority. If our backup fails we have a serious problem and I'd prefer either an election where we are voting in the full knowledge that any such candidate may have to take over completely, or a Commish appointment with a confirmation vote by the people. I don't know about everyone else but I voted content in the knowledge that who I was voting for as Commish/Alpha Talent would be able to do the job, and I do not wish to have to accept that all other candidates could possibly end up with the job.
*in official polls first post no voting answers may be posted.
Yes. This is already a standard, it is just putting it into writing (as if we really needed it in writing).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darkness' Edge
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kassiopeia
I agree with MWIA... we could just have any person as a Director if they'd have to poll absolutely everything.
Also I'd like to put forward a motion - all the radical order polls that the Directors are to make would last at this time three days, right? Well I would suggest that this be reduced to two days. We would still catch a probably equal amount of the voting populace but the bureaucratic tardiness we suffer from at the moment would ease off. |
I'll second that.
Also, I decided to vote on this.
Yes to directors orders (with reservations, I may well change this to a no later on), no to alpha talent, yes to first post.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Darkness' Edge
|
|
I basically agree with MWIA said.
Sure, we don't want something like in the Civ2 game, where our beloved president played about 20 turns without a single poll or sending the savegame to the ministers, but sometimes judgment needs to be taken on whether a decision is important enough.
For instance, in this last turnchat, we ran out of exploration orders when all the other orders still had quite some mileage. So a quickpoll was held, and we voted to go after two nearby pods. No harm done, and it kept the session going so we were able to finish more of our existing orders.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|