 |
|
Kirov
|
|
Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002 time: 06:22
|
|
Is there anyone willing to play PBeM in either SMAC or SMAX? All the options are negotiable (tho I suggest transcend).
Alternatively, can someone tell me how to get into any already existing or recently founded PBeM games? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thrar
|
|
unless the settings differ much from the common stuff, count me in.
SMAX preferred, but if we cant get that, so be it...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DarthMaur
|
|
in Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002 time: 05:22
|
|
What are default settings, anyway?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kirov
|
|
Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002 time: 06:22
|
|
I think we should play SMAC rather than SMAX, which is less common. 4.0 patch, of course.
Well, about the settings, i was going to suggest standard map of planet OR custom standard/large planet with all the options average.
Blind research... hmm... I admit, I don't like it. it's just uncomfortable. But if someone insist, I'll agree.
Steal tech? As you wish, I have used to this option on.
Also, I recommend the Bell Curve and No Unity Scattering (w/o supply pods) on, to decrease randomness of the game.
Difficulty level - thinker perhaps? Hercules, how "newbie" are you?
Ah, almost forgot, if everyone agrees, maybe we should consider some changes in alpha.txt? (e.g. longer bulding of sensor array).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thrar
|
|
unless one of us doesnt have SMAX, why shouldnt we play that?
Standard size (rnd or custom), transcend level, no steal tech and unchanged alpha.txt imo, the rest is fine with me if u dont like randomness. Dunno about my faction yet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrClever
|
|
Yeah, can I play, too?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thrar
|
|
so, let me summarize what we have so far:
Players (player - faction - email)
Kirov - University - walterschellenberg@yahoo.ca
Thrar - Peacekeepers - chennigfeld@t-online.de
Hercules - Hive - cathal.mullaghan@ntlworld.com
MrClever - ? - ?
DarthMaur - Spartans - ?
Zefir - Morganites - ?
1 more human, or 1 AI player?
if u submit your email and/or faction preference, i will update this.
Settings:
One for all: Allow cooperative victory : YES
Do or Die: Dont restart eliminated players : NO
Look First: Flexible starting locations : YES
Tech Stagnation: Slower research rate : NO
Spoils of War: steal tech when conquer base : YES
Blind Research: Cannot set precise research goals : NO
Intense Rivalry: Opponents more aggressive : NO
No unity survey: World map not visible : YES
No unity scattering: Unity pods only at landing site : YES
Bell Curve: No random events : YES
SMAC 4.0, Transcend difficulty
Last edited by Thrar on 18-09-2002 at 15:45
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mongoose
|
|
Harrisburg,PA USA
Apr 1999 time: 00:22
|
|
To Be Determined
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:22
|
|
one comment
if you want a game that is even somewhat fast, you should hold it to 4 players. . . . Going to 5 or more can be ok but you should be prepared for longer waits between turns
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kirov
|
|
Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002 time: 06:22
|
|
OK, my email is: walterschellenberg@yahoo.ca
If possible, I will choose the faction from those left.
SMAC v. 4.0
Difficulty: Transcend
Planet: large with all the options average
One for all: Allow cooperative victory : YES
Do or Die: Dont restart eliminated players : NO
Look First: Flexible starting locations : YES
Tech Stagnation: Slower research rate : NO
Spoils of War: steal tech when conquer base : YES
Blind Research: Cannot set precise research goals : NO
Intense Rivalry: Opponents more aggressive : NO
No unity survey: World map not visible : YES
No unity scattering: Unity pods only at landing site : YES
Bell Curve: No random events : YES
Also, I'll agree with the fewer number of players, meaning that if DarthMaur join, we can launch the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thrar
|
|
your setts are ok with me, but I think large map is too much. Since every turn might take quite long, I'd prefer the earlier action coming from a smaller map size.
Small would actually be best, imo, but standard is fine for me as well. Of course, if most here want a large map, ok, I'm not the governor after all ^_^
oh, Maur, if u decide not to pick Spartans, I will take them. Otherwise I go with PKs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kirov
|
|
Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002 time: 06:22
|
|
Hey, I've got two guys willing to play, will you allow them? That will be seven, though...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kirov
|
|
Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002 time: 06:22
|
|
I've decided to play UoP, if nobody oppose.
Also, if you won't allow my fellows to play (one of them would play Morgan, I suggest to delete AI from the game.
And one qestion: do we allow players to contact in-game (i.e. using diplomation screen) , when they didn't meet yet? I'm not sure, but I'd rather allow this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrClever
|
|
Sorry, I didn't know you were waiting for me to reply. I'm here and ready to go. What faction am I playing?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zefir
|
|
Warsaw
Sep 2002 time: 07:22
|
|
Count me in, I'm that Kirovs fellow who wants to play Morgan.
Oh, and I'm against contacting before meeting in game, but if everyone else wants it I can take it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thrar
|
|
@clever: DUH! If u read the previous postings u will find out that we are still discussing some setts, need your email and faction preference. Plz post something more informative soon ^_^
Looks like we are 6 players now, Kirov (or anyone), u got one more, or do we want an AI player?
My vote would be against contact before in-game contact (getting commlink or meeting). Is standard map size fine with everyone? I'd like an even smaller map, but standard is ok. Random map I guess, with all settings average?
Updated the summary above, we still need email from Clever, Maur and Zefir, and the faction (Gaians or Miriam left) for Clever.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DarthMaur
|
|
in Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002 time: 05:22
|
|
Sorry for not posting earlier.
Well, i want to confirm i want to play Spartans, so that leaves PlanetKillers for Thrar As for settings, if we have 7 players, standart map might be to small, i'm not sure. It will be surely slowgame...
So, settings, as it stands now, are:
SMAC v. 4.0
Difficulty: Transcend
Planet: average options, standart (large?)
One for all: Allow cooperative victory : YES
Do or Die: Dont restart eliminated players : NO
Look First: Flexible starting locations : YES
Tech Stagnation: Slower research rate : NO
Spoils of War: steal tech when conquer base : YES
Blind Research: Cannot set precise research goals : NO
Intense Rivalry: Opponents more aggressive : NO
No unity survey: World map not visible : YES
No unity scattering: Unity pods only at landing site : YES
Bell Curve: No random events : YES
I'm not exactly sure about spoils of war, though. It also would be fun to have unity survey on-remember, it only shows coastline.
btw, my e-mail is tomek_kulesza@yahooc.com
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zefir
|
|
Warsaw
Sep 2002 time: 07:22
|
|
And two more things, I would like large map, and no bell curve. Large map is more important for me, from this two.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrClever
|
|
Hrm... Between Miriam and Dierdre... I dunno. They're both cool. I'll take whichever is left over. How about that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zefir
|
|
Warsaw
Sep 2002 time: 07:22
|
|
I am still voting for large, no matter how many players will be. I suggest everyone write their opinion about it, with Kirov, as PBEM creator having deciding vote if we cant come to an agreement (i mean situation with 3 wanting standard, and 3 wanting large.
What do you think?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DarthMaur
|
|
in Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002 time: 05:22
|
|
Hercules, dunno, ask them
About the map size, we might customize it and set it somewhere in between standart and large.
I just checked the difference between standart and large, its 3200 vs 4000 squares, not that much actually. (40x80 vs 44x90). We might do 42x85, for example, its 3570.
And the current list of players is:
Kirov(walterschellenberg@yahoo.ca)- University
Thrar(chennigfeld@t-online.de)-Peacekeepers
DarthMaur(Tomek_kulesza@yahoo.com)-Spartans
Hercules(cathal.mullaghan@ntlworld.com)-
MrClever(sputum@peoplepc.com)-Believers or Gaians
Zefir(?)-Morganites
(Zefir, your e-mail...)
SMAC v. 4.0
Difficulty: Transcend
Planet: ??? standart-42x85-large
One for all: Allow cooperative victory : YES
Do or Die: Dont restart eliminated players : NO
Look First: Flexible starting locations : YES
Tech Stagnation: Slower research rate : NO
Spoils of War: steal tech when conquer base : YES ??
Blind Research: Cannot set precise research goals : NO
Intense Rivalry: Opponents more aggressive : NO (irrelevant )
No unity survey: World map not visible : YES
No unity scattering: Unity pods only at landing site : YES
Bell Curve: No random events : YES ??
We have to decide about tose things with question marks then.
We have still one slot open. If anyone wants to join, he's welcome 
EDIT/ If no one joins, we can effectively kill last AI faction.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|