 |
|
althena1
|
|
I have a bunch of tundra tiles... and those are equally good with a mine, or with a forest.
The forest takes longer to do tho.
Do forests have any effect on global warming? If so... ill make forests instead to... clean the air a bit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnM2433
|
|
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Jul 2002 time: 21:22
|
|
I don't think a mine gives the same number of sheilds as a forest (2) unless the tile is railroaded. If it already is, a mine would probably be best; I don't know this for sure, but I doubt that forests effect global warming in the game. Of course they should, for it to be realistic. If the tile doesn't yet have a railroad, I think that just foresting it might take less time than both mining it and changing the road to railroad -- I'm not sure. Finally, if the tundra is on the perimeter of your empire, foresting it will slow invading troops, due to the increased movement cost.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Akaoz
I've decided I don't believe in Global Warming in Civ3. So I turned the whole thing off. |
Where do you actually turn off golbal warming in the editor?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
IRON_BRIGADE
|
|
No kidding, go display your level of political ignorance in some other forum, Bush has nothing to do with this thread.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|