 |
| |
|
|
jdjdjd
|
 |
of España
May 2002
time: 00:22
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by notyoueither
I thought it better to discuss than to bush whack by filing a complaint myself. I can do that, right?
I also wanted to gauge opinion on the conduct of those polls that are being presented as being the decision of the people.
I see that I am not alone. |
Of course, nye, as always, no offense meant in the heat of the debate....and you know I love a good debate. Perhaps a PM to Aggie setting him straight may have been better, but nothing in the CoL holds you back from presenting this thread.
While you are not alone in wanting the Sistine, as Togas post shows, there is no way we will get Theology until the war with Persia is over, and waiting risks losing a possible GL or allowing some one else to complete either or both Sun Tsu and Sistine.
Aggie did not have to poll, and now he has indicated it is an unofficial poll, and based on the Trevman case it is an acceptable way to make a poll unofficial. The final decision can not be based on it. They could conduct an official poll, but time does not allow that, as UnOrthoDox points out the new Amendment requires they play a turn before the 18th, which leaves tonight. They are not bound by the CoL to do such a poll but they are bound by the CoL to play the turn. Without the poll the decision should be joint by both GK and Aggie as indicated in Togas post above.
I am not sure if there is a valid case to present to the Court at this juncture, you may feel different and have the right to present that case. Only a specific case before the court could allow the court to file an injunction. And as I see it, only a court injunction could prevent this mandated turnchat.
If you do present a case, obviously you could not sit on the case. If you request so, I would also not sit on the case. Leaving Epi, K-man and shiek to review and decide on the injunction and then the case.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001
time: 22:22
|
|
I don't necessarily want to keep this thread going, but...
I said 'should', not must. It is certainly possible that the court could invalidate a poll based on lack of discussion leading to flawed questions.
Those who wish to put up a poll are strongly recommended to first discuss the issue in another thread, and bounce around possible options for voting. If someone feels that a poll could have been better made as a 'grouping' poll, or a 'yes/no' poll, then it may be deemed invalid.
/Edit. This is regarding Official polls only. Unofficial polls can do whatever the pollster wants, but they are not binding.
Last edited by notyoueither on 18-09-2002 at 03:18
|
|
| |
|
|
|
wervdon
|
|
Heh, One of the things about this I found so funny was how a few of the people being pro-art of war argue it both ways.
"We can't save the leader cause we'll lose chances at more leaders" (keyword chance)
"We shouldn't go army because the epic just increases our chances at leaders." (keyword chance)
Also I personally would get Sistine's at all cost. It makes too big of a difference on emperor not to. I'd even be for premature peace with persia for theology, building the sistines, wiping out america during the 20 turn "cease fire" then resuming war with persia, if thats what it took to get theology now.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22.
Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-09-2002 00:18
And I agree with you when all I can say is *sigh*
|