 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:22
|
|
I have to agree with Haaretz's editorial commeny on this whole thing: Pointless.
All it does is make Arafat relevant, slow down any reforms in the PA while doing nothing to weaken Hamas, which hey, actually carried out the attack. The Israeli govenment has a fixation with Arafat, since it feeds oin their mistaken belief that these last two years were a from the top, organized campaign, without support from all Palestinians. Well, the IDF has done agreat job at browbeating and pounding the Palestinians down, but has faied utterly at making peace more possible. Fine, less Israelis will die, though they certainly will have lousy lives, for as long as the conflict continues Israels economy will continue to falter.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Terrorist elements must be destroyed. No negoititations can be held with terrorists.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sirotnikov
|
 |
<--- Yes, It's a "kitty" in a boot.
Feb 2000 time: 07:22
|
|
quote: Araft's police have no more facilities- the IDF blew them all up
|
And what is your source on that? I doubt we blew up 50% of their facilities.
If they have no facilities, how could they possibly have gotten new ammo and weapons to fire in the air in the last several days of demonstrations? 
About N. Ireland- I seem to recall several terrorists kept on practicing and making weapons "just in case" that were caught earlier this year.
Also, I'd like to again point out your ignorance, and I challenge you to prove when has Ben Gurion ever participated in a terrorist act.
Furthermore, for the most of them, terrorists do not have good intentions. For every mandela, there are ten thousand Bin Ladens.
I challenge your idea that if the IDF hadn't invaded Gaza until this instant, it won't. Infact, what it needs is to soften up the blow.
The founder of Hamas will be deported soon, it was just in the newspapers the other day.
Furthermore - Hamas is less of a problem than the PLO. There are dozens of Hamases and Jihads and PFLPs and such things.
The only way to win against them, is to have a new PA - one which not only doesn't aid terror, but one which fights terror.
What good will ousting Hamas will do, if the current PA is putting thousands of dollars into it's own version of Hamas, the Tanzim-Fatah "Al-Aqsa Martyrs" ??
Waku - great idea. Speaking of which, Milosevic and Mulah Omar will also die of old age sometime in the future - why don't we let them free??
Russians have a joke about this subject. You say that Arafat is ill and will die sooner or later, but I bet he'll catch some illness on your funeral day.
Meaning - he may seem ill, but he might just live longer than you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:22
|
|
Most of Arafat's family members lived until age 90. Today he's ~75.
He must be killed, dor the sake of the Palestinian children.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:22
|
|
Well, there is the bombing of the King David Hotel, for one- and of course, countless little attacks agaisnt Briotish troops and official, since as we know from israel, attacks even agiainst such targets are terrorist attacks.
As for NI, yes, there are some gorups left armed, but they have peace anyway- may I add the Sri lankan gov. as another gov. willing to negotiate with terrorists (Tamil Tigers) to bring about peace.
Which paeprs speak about deporting Hamas political chiefs? Certainly not haaretz.
Hamas is far more of a problem than the PA_ how many of the last suicide bombings were carried out by factions of fatah? 0. By Hamas or Islamic jihad? all.
And finally, as any israeli shoul now, when under external attack, no society will move towards internal change- so as long as Israel keeps attacking the PA, no palestinians will move to change it- as it would be seen as a sign of giving in to Israeli violence.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:22
|
|
CG : Is that why he declared that "restraint is power" after the Dolphinarium massacre and did not retaliate on any attacks for a month? Is that why it took him one and a half years and 400 Israeli deaths before he ordered to start operation "Defensive Shield"? Is that why Arafat still lives?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Certainly there can be no peace with a terrorist like Arafat. No peace with terrorist organizations. No peace until arab nations accept the right of Israel to exist. Its going to come down to force of arms.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sheik
|
|
I find it ridiculous that Bush supports a Palestinian State. He will be reforming Iraq #1 while creating Iraq #2. Arafat and Sadam are both terrorists and need to be dealt with as such.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sirotnikov
|
 |
<--- Yes, It's a "kitty" in a boot.
Feb 2000 time: 07:22
|
|
quote: Just shows that you should start reading real news instead of the Daily Hatred or whatever it is you get your stuff from. |
First, let me congratulate you on your third time to use a source.
Then, I would like you congratulate you on being irrelevant or simply misunderstanding what I was talking about.
quote: 'restraint is power'?
And this a few days after he declared that Israel would retaliate against Iraq in case of an attack, even though the US was practically begging for Israel to be calm? |
Reading this text would make me think that you believe that the quote 'restraint is power' came "a few days after he declared Israel would..."
However reading Eli's text again, to which you refer:
quote: Is that why he declared that "restraint is power" after the Dolphinarium massacre |
We manage to gather that this was said soon after the Dolphinarium massacare.
The Dolphinarium massacare, as you never cared to check your sources for, occured in summer of 2001. That would be a year and a bit ago.
But then again, why bother with such details? You can build a world view from personal opinions alone, right?
In any case -your point is weak, since just because restraint is power, it doesn't mean that it fits all situations. To maintain its detterance, Israel feels it must retaliate in the case of attack.
Just because Sharon doesn't find restraint adivsable in this situation, doesn't mean he is not familiar with the concept, as Eli showed.
quote: Eyes watering from sarcasm again. |
You better bring a handcarechief.
Hitler did indeed use restraint, as he wanted to attack Russia even earlier, and some of his generals argues against him. He saw Russia's preparations for a surprise attack, which was indeed in the making.
This makes your comparison irrelevant too.
But hey, my sources are probably lying about this too.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|