 |
|  |
 |
|
loinburger
|
 |
Sweet Sauce Jones
Jul 1999 time: 00:22
|
|
My thoughts on this matter can be "summed up" ( ) with the following long-post from a recent thread on this subject:
I don't ethically consider an entity to be human if it has no brain activity. Somebody who is brain-dead and being kept "alive" by a respirator is still biologically considered a human being (the person's DNA hasn't suddenly mutated by virtue of the fact that the person's brain is not functioning), but ethically I no longer think of the person as human. Similarly, an embryo has no brain activity, and so ethically I don't consider an embryo to be human regardless of its biological classification.
I'm ambivalent as to whether humans have souls in the metaphysical sense of the word, but for purposes of this debate it's easiest if I use the term "soul" in the epistemological sense of the word--the soul is the "I" in the statement "I think therefore I am." I don't consider it very relevant as to whether or not the soul continues to exist after you die (I assume that I'll find this out when I die and not a moment sooner), which will lead to confusion over the term down the road--so, I'll use the term "atman" to reference a thing's being, its "I am," so that everybody will remember that I'm not referring to a metaphysical conception of the soul but only an epistemological conception. I'm not concerned about whether or not an aborted embryo goes to the same afterlife as the rest of us, f'rinstance, because I don't know if there even is an afterlife.
A brain-dead patient has no atman, and neither does an embryo. The fact that the embryo may develop an atman later on does not alter the fact that at present it does not have one. Therefore, to me, aborting an embryo is ethically equivalent to taking a brain-dead patient off of a respirator.
A fetus has brain activity in the third trimester, and despite the fact that its atman is still undeveloped it nevertheless has an atman by virtue of the fact that it is capable of thought. Therefore, it is unethical to abort a fetus.
I consider second-trimester abortions to be a grey area.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Somewhere in this thread someone said that a first trimester fetus was like a head of lettice.
The only problem with that is if you let nature take its course a head of lettuce doesn't become a person.
Calous disregard for human life.
Same for the comparison with a brain dead patient. Let nature take its course it doesn't become a baby.
These are fundamentals. Thats what makes me an evil fundamentalist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
And whenever I read a thread like this it reminds me that they haven't found Eric Rudolph.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
If you care to look at some previous threads as listed by loinburger, your arguments have been thoroughly refuted. |
That makes no difference to me.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|