 |
|
xobsidianx
|
|
Can someone tell me what is the highest possible score one can obtain in smacx? In single player games it is the only measure of how well you have played, but without knowing the highest possible score obtainable, you can only compare it to your own past scores. Playing at transcend, with ironman, and abundant worms (does that increase your score?), my best was 1099%. Thanks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
xobsidianx
|
|
If you guys played smacx as much as I do, you'd get 1099 also, or higher. I'm sure there are many players out there who have obtained much higher than 1099.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
xobsidianx
|
|
Cybergod, like you I play for a few hours at a time, and a game takes close to a week to finish. What I mean't about playing a lot, is that smacx is about the only computer game I enjoy playing. I tried civ 3, and I think it is lacking.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:22
|
|
I don't know of any limit to the high score but don't you find playing for score to be incredibly boring?? I mean once you have the AI down to 1 or 2 submissive bases and are getting multiple tech per turn around Transcendendent Thought 80 while you are producing drop pods and packing them into every square inch of Planet where the cloning vats booms them up immediately (with the support of your dozens of food sats) and every turn takes an hour as you have a hundred bases and blah blah blah blah blah.
I admire anyone who can go for those super high scores . . . not so much for their playing skill but their ability to put up with the tediousness necessary to get a high score--
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Adalbertus
My highscore was 2138% before boredom won, and I transcended (transcend, high native life, ironman). Two transcendent thoughts per turn and a decent growth rate do more than overcompensating the loss of points you get by deferring transcendence. |
and thats the reality--you can get obscene population growth in the late game with food sats and your crawlers focused on food and the cloning vats booming everywhere.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
xobsidianx
|
|
Yep, the end game is boring beyond measure. If Firaxis could make the end game as exiting as the beginning and middle it would have a game that would be a masterpiece. As it is, smacx is still, in my opinion, the best game out there. To end the boredom, I usually vote myself supreme leader.
A score of 2,000+! How the hell do you achieve that? I've never been good at increasing population at my bases. The highest population I ever had at a base was about 62. Usually my largest bases at game end are about 40. What holds me back is the habitation domes late appearance in the game. Would it help to make a beeline for the dome's necessary tech?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by xobsidianx .
A score of 2,000+! How the hell do you achieve that? I've never been good at increasing population at my bases. The highest population I ever had at a base was about 62. Usually my largest bases at game end are about 40. What holds me back is the habitation domes late appearance in the game. Would it help to make a beeline for the dome's necessary tech? |
If you really want to play for score. . . .
1. delay your victory
2. have the Cloudbase Academy, the PTS, the Cloning vats and at least 16 food sats (pre hab domes) and drop colony pods everywhere-- and I mean like every 2 tiles-- remember, you can starve your high pop bases for a while before they even lose 1 pop point-- while the nuts they used to utilize are booming another base . . . terraforming at this point is soil enricher and condensers-- all you build now are colonies, formers and crawlers with hab complexes and then hab domes as needed-- you should not need research or psych facilities
3. you can force boom bases past hab limits by adding colony pods to it but I see no real advantage to that since there is almost always some open space where yet another base can be placed and start booming
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mongoose
|
|
Harrisburg,PA USA
Apr 1999 time: 00:22
|
|
What is the point?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
xobsidianx
|
|
That's an interesting strategy. I never tried it, and I think I will. Two questions: first, what so you mean by "food stats" and second, how is your strategy effected by being at war with other factions? Thanks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:22
|
|
mongoose-- no point but he asked so i told him
xobsidiabx
First it is food "sats" meaning satellites-- each satellite can bring one food to EACH of your bases ( each base will only benefit up to the same number of nutrients as the number of citizens in that base)
War is almost irrelevant -- If you are just going for obscene scores, you kill everyone except for a base or two and then proceed to fill up the world.
However a satellite fueled population boom can be effective even in a closely-fought game and is one of the reason that the Cloudbase Academy is so strong. It allows new bases to more easily have the excess nutrients needed to boom. A lot of the new citizens become specialists so you can rake in obscene amounts of tech and cash which allows you to outbuild and out-tech your opponents.
Note you cannot completely fill the world with bases. IIRC a base cannot be placed adjacent to another base.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MariOne
|
 |
Erewhon in Neverland
May 1999 time: 06:22
|
|
maybe Cybergd meat "respecting the minimal spacing"... ?
Take a standard map: 3200 tiles
with tightest packing, a base takes up 4 tiles (1 basetile +3)
In theory, overlooking for now polar edges and wrap effects, you could thus pack 800 bases on a Standard map... (oh, well... 799: you must leave one to the "enemy"...)



be my guest!!!

Considering that with tightest packing (if you Condense+Enrich ALL your tiles - you'll get minerals from satellites, you can reconvert your boreholes!) each base can sustain 21 population, you'd have 799*21 = 16'779 population! Add 4 per each NutSpecial (only 2 if it's under a base), and I didn't consider the jungle at all.
I wonder how much score would it generate.... I leave it to you to find out!
Of course, as a basetile can provide only 3 nutrients against the 6 of a CondEnriched tile, the LESS bases you have the HIGHER you can push your total population up, in the end...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tonic
|
 |
Melbourne, Australia
Jun 2000 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MattyBoy
Once you know you have won, you should get the game over with asap, methinks. |
Agreed except that for newbies, it is worthwhile to continue so that further aspects of the game may be learnt - researching the full tech tree, details of unit design as tech advances, ICS implications and so on.
At this early stage of my acquaintance with SMAC, I tend to play rather slowly and like a few previous others, tend to have a break after a couple of hours. It's quite mentally exhausting with the amount of micromanagement from the mid-game onwards.
Getting back to topic, for me the actual score doesn't count for much compared to the satisfaction of achieving certain goals eg winning OCC at transcend level.
Last edited by tonic on 02-10-2002 at 16:57
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|