 |
|  |
 |
|
vmxa1
|
 |
Oviedo, Fl
Nov 2001 time: 21:22
|
|
I played it out to 2489 and voted myself in with 44 planets. I think the next one had about 6 or so, not even funny. I had forgotten that with lots of empty planets you can ignore defense as they will not attack until planets are scare. In a small universe that is very soon, with max races. At impossible and hard the research boost makes them a bit harder, if you can not get enough planets to catch up. I remember why I skip the larger universes, you have to keep cranking out colony ships, it gets to be a pain and you can have so many planets that tech is dropping on you every time you turn around. The draw for tech was embarressing, soil/adv soil/atmospheric terraforming, dam, got everything and an ultra rich to go with the rich home world. That is just mean. The AI has no chance, cranking out a large ships with phasors while they have small with lasers or maybe ion cannon. Adam armor, they have the min one and on and on.It was a crying shame.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Xentax
|
 |
North Carolina
Apr 2002 time: 00:22
|
|
(Edit: Double post. Doh.)
Last edited by Xentax on 23-10-2002 at 20:01
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Xentax
|
 |
North Carolina
Apr 2002 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by vmxa1
I can not say for sure, but the kernel is basically the same, the issues is about direct x support. Anyway, why go to 2000 instead of XP? 2000 is a dead system. |
Win2k is one of the listed supported systems, and as Rantz said, that's the OS the devs are using.
And I disagree that Win2k is dead. It may be the home install option of choice by now (Since anything is better than WinME, and JoeAverageUser seems to think Win2k is too WinNT for his taste), but our office is still using 2k (we finally got the last guy off of NT4 only a few weeks ago...).
XP is still going through growing pains -- I've seen a lot more XP machines with flaky problems -- driver issues, lack of support for some hardware, etc., than 2k machines. Driver issues are hardly an unusual thing, but when NO drivers work correctly, not even the newest available, there's a problem.
So, I'm sticking to Win2k for awhile yet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rantz
|
|
Southern CA
May 2002 time: 05:22
|
|
personally, I haven't had any problems running MOO1, 2, MoM, Doom 1, Warcraft 2, or any other Dos based game under Win2K.
Of course, I haven't tried the *really* old school stuff, of pre-'94, so that may be problematic. All of us that have tried XP at the office have run screaming from it. Matter of personal preference I suppose.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|