 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
Im thinking the Greek-Persian war.....every battle in it was 40:1 Persians to Greeks, with a massive Greek victory, anyone have a better one?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
Either....every battle in the Greek-Persian war was amazing, so I clumped them together.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:22
|
|
Well, does a battle like Thermopolye count? It was technically a Greek defeat, because the 300 Spartans were eventually betrayed and wiped out, but anytime 300 guys hold off an army of many thousands for days and beat back repeated attacks by the enemy's crack troops, it's impressive.
Marathon was an actual victory for Athens, so perhaps that's a better example.
I'm sure there are some good examples involving the Romans, too, but I'm having trouble thinking of them.
Personally, though, I am always amazed that Alexander the Great (having already conquered a huge empire) marched all the way to India - and would probably have kept going if not for what was essentially a mutiny. The man was nothing if not ambitious. Oh, and he had some pretty good soldiers, too 
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
Roarks Drift was pretty amazing. 4000 impi to 100 Brits. Even with a technology advantage the British achievment was impressive considering the way things happened at Isandalwana just a short while before with 30,000 impi easily beating about 1,000 Brits which shows the tech advantage was not as overwheming as Roarks Drift might imply.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Faeelin
|
|
Tau Ceti
Oct 2001 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ethelred
Roarks Drift was pretty amazing. 4000 impi to 100 Brits. Even with a technology advantage the British achievment was impressive considering the way things happened at Isandalwana just a short while before with 30,000 impi easily beating about 1,000 Brits which shows the tech advantage was not as overwheming as Roarks Drift might imply. |
You do realize that 1 in 8 of the impis at isandalwana DIED, dont' you?
And that the Bits lost at insandalwana for using tactics which were almost necer used by the British army...
For best campaigners: I'd vote the Mongols.
Best Battle: Cannae. Thousands of lightly armored mercenaries from various countries defeat the Roman legions, who OUTNUMBER them.
Unfortunately, the romans proceeded to raise several more legions, and throughout the war never used more than a quarter (worst estimate; best states a tenth) of potential manpower reserves.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
Well, does a battle like Thermopolye count? It was technically a Greek defeat, because the 300 Spartans were eventually betrayed and wiped out, but anytime 300 guys hold off an army of many thousands for days and beat back repeated attacks by the enemy's crack troops, it's impressive.
|
There were more than 300 troops. Thats just the Spartans that stayed with Leonidas after the Persians got behind them. It ignores others that stayed and it ignores those that fought the previous days but retreated when they knew the Persians were coming through the pass.
This site gives the Greek forces as 10,000
http://www-adm.pdx.edu/user/sinq/gr...ar2/thermop.htm
This page mentions others that stayed behind. For some reason the Thespians and Thebans get ignored.
http://history.boisestate.edu/westciv/persian/18.htm
This site give 7,000 to 8,000 for the Greeks and only mentions the Thebans as staying.
http://www.greyhawkes.com/blackswor...Thermopylae.htm
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Faeelin
You do realize that 1 in 8 of the impis at isandalwana DIED, dont' you? |
They won and the Brits lost almost every single man. Yet at Roarks Drift with about the same ratio of attackers to defenders the Brits won.
quote:
And that the Bits lost at insandalwana for using tactics which were almost necer used by the British army... |
They pretty much didn't have time for tactics of any kind. They were overrun before they could do much. The whole thing was a botch but the Brits still had the same guns there as at Roarks Drift and Zulus had the same weapons.
Canae was pretty impressive though. There were Roman survivors even though the descriptions of the battle that I have seen gave the impression that there weren't any. Supposedly Scipio had 10,000 veterans of Canae when he took Carthage. Maybe I have that all garbled. Its been a while since I have read anything on that.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|