 |
| |
|
|
Arnelos
|
 |
of the Free World
Sep 2002
time: 00:22
|
|
Ok, as most members should know, I sent out PMs requesting that our leadership (Thud and Spiffor, namely) being the process of organizing the party for elections. Since they haven't responded (both of them must be out of town or busy) and I actually haven't heard from either of them in a while, I'm just going to start this thread myself - leaving the seat warm for Thud when he returns 
As I mentioned to most you already in PMs, we need to ORGANIZE for the upcoming election. Nominations are DUE BY THIS COMING SATURDAY and we currently have TWO candidates on the ballot...
We need to figure out the following for EACH RACE on the ballot:
1. Whether someone from DIA will be running and, if so, who.
2. If no-one from DIA will be running which candidate the DIA will choose to support. It is even conceivalbe in multiple races that the DIA and the Hawks will be supporting the same obvious candidate (imagine that!? ). I'd wager that the grand share of exceptional candidates are independents anyhow and although they likely won't be joining the DIA anytime soon, I'm sure they wouldn't be complaining if we all voted for them because we honestly thought they were the best person for the job  . We need to keep our minds open for that.
CRITICALLY... (and this will help us with endorsements/who to support AND with the platforms of our own candidates) we need to establish something along the lines of a party platform for the race that is (1) senisible and broadly appealing over dogmatic and (2) still in line with our principles and strategic outlook. I know I have some of my own thoughts on this matter, but I think I'll give some people the chance to chime in on that first (especially since I'm a good bit more "moderate/centrist" of a DIA-type than many of the more committed pacifists  ).
Feel free to use PMs to communicate with myself or anyone else if you don't want to clutter this thread with everything that needs to be said.
Time is of the esense here, fellow builders - the time for nominations to close is drawing near.
Those of you interested in running for the DIA or gaining the support of this party are highly encouraged to post here in order to make that known and the rest are encouraged just as much to discuss such things!
So, for peace, for justice, yada, yada, yada, start talking!
----
Btw, most of you should already have a member list if you want to PM people or offer nominations for DIA people for positions - I provided it to you in my last PM. It's also publicly listed in the DIA Renewal thread (about 3-4 days back I think). I figure we might get some new people in here over the next week, so we can go ahead and post a full list including new people when they get here
Last edited by Arnelos on 07-10-2002 at 16:07
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Arnelos
|
|
of the Free World
Sep 2002
time: 00:22
|
|
Here's a post we can edit with who is either running or we are thinking of supporting for each position:
President:
Ninot (Independent)?
WhiteBandit (Independent)?
MrWhereItsAt (Independent)?
Vice President:
Arnelos (DIA)?
Minister of Foreign Affairs:
Nimitz (DIA)?
Togas (Independent)?
Supreme Military Commander:
Aggie (Independent)?
Minister of Economics:
Reddawg (Independent)?
City Planner:
E_T (Independent)?
zeit (Independent)?
History Guy (Hawk)?
Minister of Public Works:
GhengisFarb (Independent)?
Minister of Science:
Thud (DIA)?
Duddha (Hawk)?
ThePlagueRat (Independent)?
Minister of Imperial Expansion:
Meshelic (Hawk)?
Apocalypse (Independent)?
U.N. Representative:
Apocalypse (Independent)?
------------
This post will be edited as the discussion continues.
Actual DIA members will be in italics, all other candidates for now are listed, but not in italics. We, as a party, can decide which ones to support.
Last edited by Arnelos on 09-10-2002 at 17:48
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ninot
|
 |
Centre Bell
Nov 2001
time: 00:22
|
|
Well, im an independant but former DIA, and you already know many of my sentiments towards what out future needs to be
but i suggest if you want a good platform for Term 5, it would involve shying away from military advances, in favor of building up our current holdings. If a Hawk wants to oppose this view, let him, but the DIA does not need to encompass warmongering views anymore, not like back in the day.
Also, spreading duties to governors instead of a single post will allow for more building up rather than general plans for war. If we can push for ammendments that finally give powers to governors, building up will come more naturally.
Our country is primarily illiterate, and it is of my opinion that a tech lead will win us this game, no matter how we win it. If we keep bashing threw militarily, without paying heed to the needs of building up, eventually one of our enemies may possess military power superior to ours, and then we are done for.
So the DIA platform should be for building right now. It is the best time, with our upcoming palace jump and FP, and we don't need any more land at all really.
btw, should i run for President (like I've hinted i might), it will be as an independant, but I'll take any DIA support i can get
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
jdjdjd
|
 |
of España
May 2002
time: 00:22
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by UnOrthOdOx
It is rather odd that with all the members the DIA boasts of, the game has been nothing short of a Hawk paradise to this point... |
Its quotes like this from the Neo-Nazi, unltra-conservative, right wing that has caused me to join the DIA.
And if you weren't so busy filling the threads with such nonsense as this post, you would see that the DIA has been very influential, and was the reason the first war with France ever came to be and succeeded. (Remember, Ninot was DIA before he jumpled ship and went independent....interestingly enough the same ship he hopes to get a ride back to the palace on.)
And don't think we forgot that you claimed to be independent when you ran for VP, only now to take out your SS Uniform, and goose-step down Main Street, Termina.
Oh, of course, I'm just roleplaying you Imperialist Pig.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Arnelos
|
|
of the Free World
Sep 2002
time: 00:22
|
|
Alrighty then... citing the [almost] lack of discussion on the issue off the platform, I'll just go ahead and kick of the discussion and hope others join in...
Here's my initial concept for things to go on the platform:
FIRST ITEM
There seems to be a wide consensus (short of the truly committed warmongers) that Apolytonia needs to go into an extended period of peaceful development following the end of the American campaign. We have at least 17 turns before the peace treay with France is up for re-negotiation, so the Hawks' suggestion to soon go tromping after them is unlikely to resonate with voters. Even in the Hawks' own threads, the argument has centered around waiting for the advent of 'Military Tactics' and Cavalry to go about that conflict.
As such, we have an advantage on this issue and, by all means, we should use it for all that it is worth. This should be the leading point on our platform for Term V. That the bulk of at least the early portion of the term should be spent entirely (or as near to entirely as possible) on peaceful infrastructure development.
SECOND ITEM
Attached to the first item, it would seem that a switch to republic would be conducive to that goal. We should attempt to switch to republic as soon as it is economical to do so, that we might come to enjoy the increased trade under that system of government.
THIRD ITEM
As part of our peaceful infrastructure development during much of the Middle Age, it should be a primary goal to develop the dominant culture in the known world. We can make conquests of foreign cities through our superior culture if this effort is successful even while our military is still be updated for the next period of possible conflict at the end of the Middle Age.
FOURTH ITEM
We should press for using this period of peaceful infrastructure develop to focus especially on the development of scientific city improvements and the maximizing of trade within our empire. If done successfully, it will finally be possible for Apolytonia to research its own technologies without having to purchase all technologies from foreign powers.
-------
I encourage comment from DIA members. We need to ensure that we have something of an agreement on whatever platform we end up adopting for Term V... a platform we can use in both these elections AND in the upcoming term in the Senate.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sean
|
|
Auckland, New Zealand.
Jan 2001
time: 05:22
|
|
jdjdjd, what are you running for then ;-)
But seriously, The DIA, needs to stand in as many positions as possible. Particularly members that have something of a profile in the Democracy Game forum.
Sean.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Arnelos
|
|
of the Free World
Sep 2002
time: 00:22
|
|
Well, as I somewhat predicted, when some of the big pieces that were in the "uncertainty" territory fell into place, it was like the first dominos knocking down other dominos...
WhiteBandit (currently Minister of Public Works) is running for President.
GhengisFarb (current Minister of Imperial Expansion, who was considering either President or Public Works) is running for Public Works (now that WhiteBandit is running for President, almost for sure).
Apocalypse (currently VP, who was considering U.N. Rep or going executive again) is running for U.N. Representative
adaMada is not running, staying as Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs
Aro is not running, staying as Geographer
I am now running for Vice President
The top (and perhaps only) thing that would cause a political earthquake now would be if Togas, Aggie, or Reddawg decided to run for another post or to not run for re-election... then everyone would be scrambling to see who would run for their spots and this entire newly established "stability" would completely collapse  Otherwise, however, this looks like it has the signs of becoming stable...
So if you were someone thinking about running for an office and wanted to know where the people currently talking about it were going to end up before jumping in yourself, THIS IS THE TIME!
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
UnOrthOdOx
|
 |
Hello....
Jun 2002
time: 22:22
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by jdjdjd
Its quotes like this from the Neo-Nazi, unltra-conservative, right wing that has caused me to join the DIA.
And if you weren't so busy filling the threads with such nonsense as this post, you would see that the DIA has been very influential, and was the reason the first war with France ever came to be and succeeded. (Remember, Ninot was DIA before he jumpled ship and went independent....interestingly enough the same ship he hopes to get a ride back to the palace on.)
And don't think we forgot that you claimed to be independent when you ran for VP, only now to take out your SS Uniform, and goose-step down Main Street, Termina.
Oh, of course, I'm just roleplaying you Imperialist Pig. |
Large talk from a skirt wearing peacenick who once founded STOP. Let us get one thing straight, never at one point during my campaign did I claim to be independant, and at no point have I denied the fact that I was a Hawk. I specifically ran for VP, though, as that positions makes no decisions to effect the game itself, it only carries out the ministers order when the game is played. I ran the office with a strict hand, and one that organized a floundering nation to bring it into order.
I suspect that you spent a few days too long wandering the jungle eating Fruit Bats and enjoying the company of your Monkey's, that would explain the obvious lack of memory and addled thought processes that are apparent with your every word. If you would care to look back into our past you would see it was I who brought about the war on France. Taking command for the injured MrWhereitsat, I immediately declared war on France and sacked Paris. Here, for your convenience, oh confused one:
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...&threadid=59684
Perhaps you should go back to wearing these silly things  and opposing politics. Or shall we run you from town again? At least that way we could get an entertaining letter now and again.
And, yes, this is roleplaying for the logically challenged.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jdjdjd
|
|
of España
May 2002
time: 00:22
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by UnOrthOdOx
Large talk from a skirt wearing peacenick who once founded STOP. Let us get one thing straight, never at one point during my campaign did I claim to be independant, and at no point have I denied the fact that I was a Hawk. I specifically ran for VP, though, as that positions makes no decisions to effect the game itself, it only carries out the ministers order when the game is played. I ran the office with a strict hand, and one that organized a floundering nation to bring it into order.
I suspect that you spent a few days too long wandering the jungle eating Fruit Bats and enjoying the company of your Monkey's, that would explain the obvious lack of memory and addled thought processes that are apparent with your every word. If you would care to look back into our past you would see it was I who brought about the war on France. Taking command for the injured MrWhereitsat, I immediately declared war on France and sacked Paris. Here, for your convenience, oh confused one:
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...&threadid=59684
Perhaps you should go back to wearing these silly things and opposing politics. Or shall we run you from town again? At least that way we could get an entertaining letter now and again.
And, yes, this is roleplaying for the logically challenged. |
I meant to say American War with respect to Ninot.
Now thats not fair, you know I have a soft spot for those hats....
And lets not forget, who was it that saved you from the damned French, and also who dragged that lousy underground paper with no name of yours out of obscurity and into national prominence?!
Now stop cluttering DIA threads with such nonsensical right winged rhetoric.
Once again, that was role play, of course everyone knows the Jungle Gazette was never an underground newspaper.
Now back to serious matters. Sorry for cluttering this thread with anti-Hawk sentiments.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22.
Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2002 15:52
|