 |
|  |
 |
|
Togas
|
 |
California
Jun 2002 time: 21:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Panzer32
I would like to see less of the warmongering strategy... lets try to work together with our neighbours, while we build up our homeland. What is both of your replies to this? |
Ah HA! Finally. A question.
This office controls the ability to make peace and make alliances. It has signifigant power to promote or deter war and conquest.
I have never chosen to use that power to direct, delay, hinder, or promote a "warmongering strategy." This office has been used to faithfully aid and assist in whatever strategy the nation has followed.
Historically, the nation as a whole has been on a conquest path and it has lead us to become the greatest Civilization on the continent, and this office has assisted with that. Should we switch to a more industrious strategy, this office will follow suit without hesitation.
As for "working together with our neighbors," I would prefer to remain at peace (as we have negotiated all of our peace treaties, except America, to last another 20 years), as that is what we have planned in our long term mission. However, I cannot say that I want to work "together" with our neighbors, other than economically.
I don't like alliances that much. I don't do MPPs. I disdain RoP agreements. And I just don't trust the AI, period. We once had a program where we gave tech to "charity" nations, but that program ceased when a charity suddenly had tech we didn't have ... and wouldn't give us a good price for it.
Our neighbors are our competition. I'm happy with peaceful competition, but I have no qualms with using every dirty trick I know to foil any nation that dares to spill Apolytonia blood, or steal our resources.
--Togas
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
adaMada
|
 |
"The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Mar 2000 time: 00:22
|
|
I'll go ahead and ask one... I guess this is probably directed towards Nimitz a bit since I know some of Togas' plans, but I'd like to hear what both canidates think...
As some of you may or may not know, interest in being Foreign Ministry deputies was (as of last term, anyway) very high. Clearly, we want to reduce overlap between the deputies, keep active people on the 'payroll' , and have some sort of logical structure that allows as many interested people as possible to participate.
What do both of you think of a potential three-pronged type structure? Minister (potentially Vice Minsiter as well if you like that system), Intelligence (Responsible for monitoring the other nations and their actions), and Advisory (Responsible for advising on general foreign policy and coming up with specific deals).
Just thought I might get a bit of discussion flowing on that topic, since it's not an easy one, and I'd like to hear what both Canidates think...
-- adaMada
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Togas
|
 |
California
Jun 2002 time: 21:22
|
|
Next term, if I'm elected, I plan to do something of the sort that Ada is saying. I'll divide the work up like this:
Trade -- If we get E_T back, I'll be releaved. This is a very time consuming job, and he was excellent. If not, I'll be interviewing someone to take over as Trade Advisor.
Policy -- One, possibly two deputies if I can find the work. These are advisors and people responsible for not just suggesting changes to current policies, but coming up with new ones. Policy rules everything else, it's a key position in the Ministry. Policy dictates who we prefer to trade with, what we will trade for, who we would side with, what demands we'll give into, when and if peace should be renegotiated, etc.
Everyone on the team assisted with Policy last term, but I will focus it more if I get some serious interest. adaMada and Nimitz were primarily Policy deputies, but E_T and Gepap influenced.
Espionage/Intel -- One, possibly two deputies who turn out reports on what our neighbors are up to and who analyze information we have about our neighbors and possible threats. Gepap's job last term fell into this category, E_T also did a bit of Intel work for us. I have offered a job to History Guy as Deputy Minister of Foreign Intelligence should he fail in his election (and should I be relected). We'll work early on to give him some specific duties and get him also involved.
Of course, adaMada would remain Vice Minister, and in charge of the office while I was away or unavailable. I have no plans to change the current Ministry team at all, just add a person or two, divide up the work a bit better, and enjoy my final month working with these guys. 
--Togas
|
|
|  |
 |
|
adaMada
|
 |
"The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Mar 2000 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Togas
Ada -- If we have someone who wants to help us out with keeping track of the numbers, I'd appreciate it. I considered that to be part of the Trade Deputy's job, or Intel's job. It needs to be flexible, as we don't always know who can make it to the turnchats. The team approach has worked well so far, but I wouldn't object to any additional help, especially in this area.
--Togas |
Yea, I was just thinking about what jobs we could use in general, and that's the most useful of all the ones I've thought of so far... It probably wouldn't require that they be able to make it to turnchats, just that they can spend a bit of time with a .sav after each one is posted plugging numbers.
Considering the number of applicants we had last time, I'm betting someone'd be interested in the job...
-- adaMada
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|